違反客觀規律 的英文怎麼說

中文拼音 [wéifǎnguānguī]
違反客觀規律 英文
go against the objective laws
  • : 動詞1. (不遵照; 不依從) disobey; defy; violate 2. (離別) part; leave; be separated
  • : Ⅰ名詞1 (方向相背) reverse side 2 (造反) rebellion 3 (指反革命、反動派) counterrevolutionari...
  • : 觀名詞1. (道教的廟宇) taoist temple2. (姓氏) a surname
  • : Ⅰ名詞1 (畫圓形的工具) instrument for drawing circles 2 (規則; 成例) rule; regulation 3 [機械...
  • : Ⅰ名1 (法律; 規則) law; rule; statute; regulation 2 (律詩的簡稱) short for lüshi 3 (姓氏) a ...
  • 違反 : violate; run counter to; transgress; infringe
  • 規律 : law; regular pattern
  1. Firstly, some basic concepts are not clear, such as what is the status of the company under liquidation, how to define the action of the industrial - commercial authority ' s invalidation of the license of the company, whether or not the share holders can sue to disincorporate the company, is it legal to dissolve a company without liquidation, what is special liquidation, under what situation will a company be obliged to disincorporate, who will be responsible for liquidation after the dis incorporation, etc. secondly, some primary legislative principles about disincorporation and liquidation that are adopted in foreign countries are not established in china, such as a company must be liquidated before disincorporation except for acquisition, the company remains valid during the liquidation until it finishes the invalidation registration, an ordinary liquidation must be replaced by a special liquidation under the instruction of the court when there is an impediment or a fraud, the company should apply to the court for bankruptcy when it is found that its debt is over its asset during the liquidation, the number of people execute liquidation can be several or just one, companies applied for annulment shall be judged by the court and must be liquidated, etc. thirdly, china does n ' t have some of the fundamental rules that are specified in the laws of foreign countries, such as the rule of disincorporation registration, the rule that the company should sue to let the court judge for disincorporation if there is a deadlock between share holders, the rule of credit trade - off in special liquidation, the rule that people who execute the liquidation are jointly responsible for compensating the loss of the third party caused by their activities that are illegal or vicious, the rule of special liquidation, the rule of the representation of the people who execute the liquidation, the rule of the court supervising the liquidation in an inactive way, the rule of how long the accounts and documents should be kept after disincorporation, etc. because of the lack in research and legislation, the system for companies leaving the market is highly disorganized, which harmed the interest of the creditors and relevant people, increased the risk of market exchange, damaged the order of the market economy and the ethic of doing business, wasted the resources of the society, and impaired the authority and seriousness of the law

    再次,國外立法上的一些基本制度我國沒有,如解散登記制度,股東出現僵局訴請法院判決解散制度,特別清算中的債權協定製度,清算人因法或惡意對第三人承擔連帶賠償責任制度,司法特別清算制度,清算人的代表性制度,法院消極監督清算制度,帳薄及文件在公司解散后保存法定期限制度等。由於理論研究和立法的不足,造成了我國公司法人退出市場機制的嚴重混亂,損害了債權人和利害關系人的利益,增加了市場主體交易不安全感,破壞了市場經濟秩序和商業道德,浪費了社會資源,削弱了法的權威性和嚴肅性。文章認為,完善我國公司解散和清算制度,應借鑒和引進發達國家的法學理論和法制度,統一我國有關解散和清算立法,在基本概念、基本原則、基本制度、基本程序諸方面進行統一范,填補立法空白,創設法院解散公司制度,廢除行政特別清算制度代之以司法特別清算制度,健全和嚴格清算定的法責任制度(包括民事責任,刑事責任,行政責任,改變現行行政處罰范圍偏廣,民事賠償范圍偏窄,刑事追究空白太多的不協調狀況) ,從而構築起科學的公司解散和清算制度,使之符合我國經濟生活的需求,符合市場經濟發展的基本方向,並與國外立法通例趨同。
  2. Part two : definition, characteristics and acting models of securities fraud securities fraud is the act of breaching the securities laws in order to gain illegal interests which is acted by the issuers, the securities institutions, the securities administrators, the securities practician and investors so on

    分析了證券欺詐的構成要件進行,欺詐行為的主體有自然人、法人和其他單位,主方面只能是故意,侵犯的方面表現為相關的法,侵犯的體有投資者的合法利益和金融管理制度以及證券市場的管理秩序。
  3. The objective aspect of the crime behaves that during the medical treatment, the subject of the crime breaks the regulations concerning that and grossly neglects his duty, which causes death or severe harm to the health of the patient. the conviction of the causation in this crime is difficult and crucial

    就本罪方面來看,該罪發生在醫療活動中,表現為犯罪主體有關醫療衛生法、行政法、部門章、診療護理常、有關習慣常理及醫德的嚴重不負責任的作為或不作為,並由此導致了就診人死亡或身體健康嚴重受損的實害結果。
  4. It is not many scholars to clearly prove the opinion of shifting the burden of proof, on the contrary the contradictory scholars are more prominent, for example the vice professor of southwest politics and law university, chengang, wuyue who translates and introduces the burden of proof of germany, because them there are more and more people support the opposite opinion, while in the draft of " civil evidence code ", the traditional idea win, in this draft the legislator abides by the present justice and our country ' s native circumstance, they made an scientific choice, of course, the burden of proof will directly influence the party " s possibility of losing the lawsuit, while the regulation of shifting the burden of proof increases the plaintiff ' s opportunity to win a lawsuit. to explain what is the shifting of burden of proof, the paper use the civil law as the example to point out the " reverse " is not entirly relieve the plaintiff s obligation of producing evidence, but in certain extent and in certain range make the defendant bear the burden of producing those proofs from the reverse way, which are originally beard by the plaintiff. in the three proceeding law, shifting the burden of proof have some differences, but the interior spirits are coincident - for the values of social justice and the legal reason

    論證舉證責任倒置的學者點明確並且論證十分充分的不多,相卻是對此著書立說予以駁的學者較為突出,如西南政法大學的副教授陳則博士,翻譯並介紹德國證明責任學說的吳越先生均是目前國內對舉證責任倒置持否定態度的代表人物,由於他們的推動使得國內持此說的人越來越多,但在《民事證據法(草案) 》的擬定過程中,並未采責任倒置的地位,這樣的立法選擇是建立在對我國法實現的本土環境認識的基礎上的科學選擇,誠然,舉證責任的分配直接影響到當事人在訴訟中的敗訴風險,而「倒置」則的設計,則在此問題上增加了原告勝訴的籌碼,在理解何為舉證責任倒置時,本文著重以民事法為主線,指出這種「倒置」並非全部免除原告的證明責任,而是在一定范圍與一定程度上將通常應由原告負擔的舉證責任轉由被告從方面承擔,舉證責任倒置在三大訴訟法中所體現的具體情形有所差異,但它們的內在精神是一致的?法的理性與社會公平價值,在民事訴訟中舉證責任倒置的情形,一般總是將其局限於特殊侵權情形,而忽略了民事合同約責任的訴訟中的原告也無須對被告應承擔約責任的所有要件,對被告主上的過錯實行推定,若被告予以否定則應對其無過錯的證據舉證,在設置舉證責任倒置的則時,從各國的立法經驗與法的內在價值要求可以總結出以下幾個原則:程序法與實體法結合原則,公平原則,訴訟經濟原則,保護弱者原則等,基於此完善舉證責任倒置的則時首先應肯定舉證責任倒置的概念,其次立法應避免求大求全,再次要配合實體法的發展,最後還可以在司法領域嘗試判例的指導意義。
  5. They had thougnt that they could make anything a miracle as long as the euthusiarn of the masses were aroused

    認為只要把人民群眾的積極性調動起來了,就可以創造一切人間奇跡,經濟
  6. I stress on three requests to the objective aspects of the crime of evading taxes. the first is the illegality of the action, which includes the break of tax material law and the tax procedural law. the second is the statute of the actions and means, which is only within the circumstances that " the taxpayer obtains the taxation by the means of forging, altering, concealing or destroying account books and vouchers for the accounts without authorization, or overstating or omitting or understating incomes in account books, or refusing to file his tax returns after the tax authorities have notified him to do so or filing false tax returns or export declaration or by other deceptive means.

    著重論述偷稅罪方面的三項要求:一是行為的法性,包括稅收實體法和稅收程序法;二是行為手段的法定性,即僅限於「偽造、變造、隱匿、擅自銷毀帳簿、記帳憑證,在帳簿上多列支出或者不列、少列收入,經稅務機關通知申報而拒不申報,進行虛假的納稅申報,以假報出口或者其他欺騙手段騙取」 ;三是行為量化標準的法定性,即必須同時滿足法定的絕對數和相對數兩條件。
分享友人