違反明示保證 的英文怎麼說

中文拼音 [wéifǎnmíngshìbǎozhèng]
違反明示保證 英文
breach of an express guarantee
  • : 動詞1. (不遵照; 不依從) disobey; defy; violate 2. (離別) part; leave; be separated
  • : Ⅰ名詞1 (方向相背) reverse side 2 (造反) rebellion 3 (指反革命、反動派) counterrevolutionari...
  • : Ⅰ形容詞1 (明亮) bright; brilliant; light 2 (明白;清楚) clear; distinct 3 (公開;顯露在外;不隱...
  • : Ⅰ動詞(擺出或指出使人知道; 表明) show; indicate; signify; instruct; notify Ⅱ名詞1 [書面語] (給...
  • : Ⅰ動詞1 (保衛; 保護) defend; protect 2 (保持) keep; preserve; maintain in good condition 3 (...
  • : Ⅰ動詞(證明) prove; verify; demonstrate Ⅱ名詞1 (證據) evidence; proof; testimony; witness 2 (...
  • 違反 : violate; run counter to; transgress; infringe
  • 明示 : express明示保釋 express bailment; 明示保證 express warranty; 明示承認 express recognition; 明示擔...
  1. Breach of an express guarantee

    違反明示保證
  2. If it be not so complied with, then, subject to any express provision in the policy, the insurer is discharged from liability as from the date of the breach of warranty, but without prejudice to any liability incurred by him before that date

    如果被險人不如此遵守之,除非險單另有規定,從被險人之日起,險人解除責任,但不妨礙在之前產生的任何責任。
  3. The aim of this article is to develop some effective studying on this point through the analysis of internal value of the displaying system of criminal evidence, and describes the active functions of it both on justice and efficiency as well as protection of the defence right of accused party. furthermore, the article compared different displaying systems of criminal evidence of the usa, great britain, japan, and italy to discuss the development rules of this system combing with the chinese present mixing litigation mode of original authority lawsuit method and the oppositional court inquiring method by both parties, which comparing and analyzing the rules of evidence - displaying both of original and present modes to list the problems existed in the present criminal evidence - displaying system. finally, the article brings forward some conceives of configuration and perfecting of chinese criminal evidence - displaying system from the selection of mode, scope, and judge function of criminal evidence - displaying and penalty measures to the deregulation of displaying of evidence etc

    首先從分析刑事據展制度的內在價值入手,充分闡述其在實現公正與效率兼顧和護被告人辯護權方面的積極作用;其次通過對美國、英國、日本和義大利的刑事據展制度的比較,來探析該制度的發展規律;再次結合我國的刑事訴訟從原來的職權主義訴訟模式轉變為現在兼有當事人主義有關規定的混合式訴訟模式,對前後兩種模式中具有據展性質的規定進行比較分析,說現在刑事據展方面存在的諸多問題;最後從刑事據展的模式選擇、刑事據展的范圍、法官在據展中的作用、以及據展規則的制裁措施等幾個主要方面,對構建和完善我國的刑事據展制度提出了設想。
分享友人