選擇權持有人 的英文怎麼說

中文拼音 [xuǎnzháiquánchíyǒurén]
選擇權持有人 英文
option holder
  • : Ⅰ動詞1. (挑選) select; choose; pick 2. (選舉) elect Ⅱ名詞(挑選出來編在一起的作品) selections; anthology
  • : 擇動詞(挑選) select; pick; choose
  • : Ⅰ名詞1 [書面語] (秤錘) counterpoise; weight (of a steelyard)2 (權力) power; authority 3 (...
  • : 動詞1 (拿著; 握著) hold; grasp 2 (持有; 保持) keep; hold 3 (支持; 保持) support; maintain 4...
  • : 有副詞[書面語] (表示整數之外再加零數): 30 有 5 thirty-five; 10 有 5年 fifteen years
  • 選擇權 : option agreement
  • 選擇 : select; choose; opt; election; choice; culling; alternative
  • 持有人 : holders
  • 持有 : hold
  1. Finally, delivery of cargo without original bills of lading promote the development of shipping in a way in practice, it has reasonability in existence. chapter three is writer ' s study for 10 leading cases of chinese maritime court and court of cassation concerning delivery of cargo without original bills of lading, writer conclude as follows : chinese courts are inclined to regard it as breach of contract but not in tort in judicial practice ; chinese courts allow the plaintiff to choose to sue in tort or of breach ; chinese courts have abandoned the viewpoint of " who holder the bills who must have the right to sue " or " who holder the bills who must win the case " ; and in many cases concerning delivery of cargo without original bills of lading, the court ignored plaintiff ' s actions against the carrier, it proved that carrier can escape reasonability of delivery of cargo without original bills of lading in some cases

    第三章論述我國海事法院及其上級法院就無單放貨案件審理的司法審判實踐研究,通過對十個法院判例的分析、歸納,筆者認為,在司法實踐中,法院越來越傾向于將無單放貨糾紛視為運輸合同糾紛處理,而不認定為侵行為糾紛;法院允許原告起訴時以侵起訴或違約起訴作出;法院對提單的訴認定,已經不採用「誰提單誰就」與「誰提單就能保證勝訴」的觀點;諸多的無單放貨的訴訟案例以被法院駁回起訴為結局,證明了無單放貨在特定情況下的合理性以及承運避免承擔責任的可能性。
  2. Article 163 where any convertible company bonds is issued, the company shall exchange its stocks for the bonds held by the bondholders in the prescribed method of conversion, provided that the bondholders have the option on whether or not to convert their bonds

    第一百六十三條發行可轉換為股票的公司債券的,公司應當按照其轉換辦法向債券換發股票,但債券對轉換股票或者不轉換股票
  3. Article 173 where convertible company bonds are issued, the company shall exchange its shares for the bonds held by the bondholders using the prescribed method of conversion, provided that the bondholders have the option on whether or not to convert their bonds

    第一百七十三條:發行可轉換為股票的公司債券的,公司應當按照其轉換辦法向債券換發股票,但債券對轉換股票或者不轉換股票
  4. Most men do not show emotion and this is why sometimes a marriage doesn t last, does not feel very solid, does not feel very secure ; the husband does not show his emotions. it is better that we show each other that we appreciate each other before it s too late. love your family members wholeheartedly ; sacrifice for them whenever necessary ; do everything you can in your power to help them and to let them know that you love them

    傳法修行后,我們要戒,雖然我們一直都,不過要作正當高貴不傷害其他不犧牲別對你的太太和先生忠誠的,並要確實了解,我們的配偶即是上帝,所以傷害別其實就是傷害你自己,因為你已經來了解上帝,而且你也知道自己應該表現得和上帝一樣。
  5. What holder obtains is an exercise right is not responsibility, holder can choose exercise

    獲得的是一個行使利而不是責任,行使與否。
  6. The plan is to finger out the laws and rules in favor of the venture capital ' s operation in order as soon as possible, establish the leading fund provided by government, offer governmental credit assurance and stock, reduce the tax to the high - tech enterprise, construct the polarizing investor frame including government, corporation, international investment company, achieve the legalization of private - collecting fund, quicken the course of endowment insurance fund of investment to the venture capital, that can solve the problem of capital shortage, to improve the rule - framework of the investment company, and expect to carry out the limited and partnership company. through the way of theoretics education and practice, introduce into the advanced technology and talent to promote the ability of investment specialist, strengthen the inspection to medi - agency and exploit the operation scope, bring forward a set of high - tech enterprise evaluating system suitable to choose the enterprise invested by the investment company. last, buy by corporation, and - techniqufi - and property right dealing market is the practicable exit channel comparatively

    即盡快制定利於風險投資規范運作的法規及條例,建立政府導向基金,為高新技術企業提供政府信用擔保、政府采購以及稅收優惠等政策支;構造由政府、大公司、國際投資公司構成的多元化投資者結構,盡快實現私募基金的合法化,加快社會養老保險基金進入風險投資的進程,以此方式解決資金短缺的問題;在目前限責任和股份限機構組織形式的基礎上,改善風險投資機構的法治理結構,並建議早日實現限合夥制組織形式;以理論教育結合實踐,引進國外先進技術和才等方法促進投資專業才能力的提高;通過加強對中介機構的監管和拓展中介機構風險投資中介服務,促進中介機構的建設,並結合實際提出一套適合於風險投資公司投資項目的高新技術企業評估體系;最後建議以大公司收購和技術產資本交易的方式作為目前較為可行的風險投資退出渠道。
  7. It is not many scholars to clearly prove the opinion of shifting the burden of proof, on the contrary the contradictory scholars are more prominent, for example the vice professor of southwest politics and law university, chengang, wuyue who translates and introduces the burden of proof of germany, because them there are more and more people support the opposite opinion, while in the draft of " civil evidence code ", the traditional idea win, in this draft the legislator abides by the present justice and our country ' s native circumstance, they made an scientific choice, of course, the burden of proof will directly influence the party " s possibility of losing the lawsuit, while the regulation of shifting the burden of proof increases the plaintiff ' s opportunity to win a lawsuit. to explain what is the shifting of burden of proof, the paper use the civil law as the example to point out the " reverse " is not entirly relieve the plaintiff s obligation of producing evidence, but in certain extent and in certain range make the defendant bear the burden of producing those proofs from the reverse way, which are originally beard by the plaintiff. in the three proceeding law, shifting the burden of proof have some differences, but the interior spirits are coincident - for the values of social justice and the legal reason

    論證舉證責任倒置的學者觀點明確並且論證十分充分的不多,相反卻是對此著書立說予以反駁的學者較為突出,如西南政法大學的副教授陳則博士,翻譯並介紹德國證明責任學說的吳越先生均是目前國內對舉證責任倒置否定態度的代表物,由於他們的推動使得國內此說的越來越多,但在《民事證據法(草案) 》的擬定過程中,並未采責任倒置的地位,這樣的立法是建立在對我國法律實現的本土環境客觀認識的基礎上的科學,誠然,舉證責任的分配直接影響到當事在訴訟中的敗訴風險,而「倒置」規則的設計,則在此問題上增加了原告勝訴的籌碼,在理解何為舉證責任倒置時,本文著重以民事法為主線,指出這種「倒置」並非全部免除原告的證明責任,而是在一定范圍與一定程度上將通常應由原告負擔的舉證責任轉由被告從反方面承擔,舉證責任倒置在三大訴訟法中所體現的具體情形所差異,但它們的內在精神是一致的?法律的理性與社會公平價值,在民事訴訟中舉證責任倒置的情形,一般總是將其局限於特殊侵情形,而忽略了民事合同違約責任的訴訟中的原告也無須對被告應承擔違約責任的所要件,對被告主觀上的過錯實行推定,若被告予以否定則應對其無過錯的證據舉證,在設置舉證責任倒置的規則時,從各國的立法經驗與法的內在價值要求可以總結出以下幾個原則:程序法與實體法結合原則,公平原則,訴訟經濟原則,保護弱者原則等,基於此完善舉證責任倒置的規則時首先應肯定舉證責任倒置的概念,其次立法應避免求大求全,再次要配合實體法的發展,最後還可以在司法領域嘗試判例的指導意義。
  8. The state - owned enterprise of our country should have the relative shareholder that controls interest and have other big shareholders exist. on the choice of the subject of stock right, should be that corporation, national company, fund, and the public, etc. set up the organization system of a set of right in conformity with structure of stock right with clearly demarcated responsibility at the same time ; strengthen and improve the function in the corporate governace of the bank ; cultivate manager market actively ; perfect the capital market

    提出了我國國企業應相對控股的股東又其它大股東存在的股結構,在股主體的上,應是企業法、國家股公司、基金組織和社會公眾等參與股,且以企業法股為核心;同時建立一套與股結構相適應的、責分明的組織體系;強化和改善銀行在公司治理中的作用;積極培育經理市場;完善資本市場。
  9. Based on the legal analysis, the author thinks that stock option is not suitable for all listed corporations and now it is only appropriate for key persons in our country. the stockholder meeting is the awarding subject but the managing subject should be the organization and compensation committee. when determining the quantity, we should consider comprehensively in the light of objective laws and chose different opportunities according to different persons

    文章對這三個方面進行了基本的法律分析,認為股票期並非適合於所的上市公司,且在我國現階段只適合授予給公司的關鍵;股東會應是股票期的授予和決策主體,薪酬委員會可以負責股票期的日常管理;在授予數量的確定上應根據客觀規律綜合考慮,針對不同身份的公司關鍵不同的授予時機,且這種授予應是續進行的。
分享友人