防衛過當 的英文怎麼說

中文拼音 [fángwèiguòdāng]
防衛過當 英文
unjustifiable self-defe e
  • 防 : Ⅰ動詞（防鷥） provide against; defend against; guard against Ⅱ名詞1 （防守; 防禦） defence 2 （堤...
  • 衛 : Ⅰ動詞（保衛） defend; guard; protect Ⅱ名詞1 （周朝國名） wei a state in the zhou dynasty2 （姓氏...
  • 過 : 過Ⅰ動詞[口語] （超越） go beyond the limit; undue; excessiveⅡ名詞（姓氏） a surname
  • 當 : 當Ⅰ形容詞（相稱） equal Ⅱ動詞1 （擔任; 充當） work as; serve as; be 2 （承當; 承受） bear; accept...
  • 防衛 : defend
  1. The article introduces four new models of the ego - defense mechanism, including reality negotiation model, dual - process model of defense, and three - factor model of defense, as well as a further exploration of its specific type - projection, summarizes the clinical, the relational, and the experimental research method of this topic in the current personality field, and gives the authors some considerations about this topic in the present study

    考察了自我防衛機制的四種新的理論模型（現實處理模型、防衛的雙過程模型、三維防衛模型、以及投射發生機制的新解釋）和自我防衛機制的臨床研究、相關研究、實驗研究三種取向，並闡述了作者對該問題當前研究趨向的幾點思考。
  2. Kcrc is able to closely monitor the weather patterns by the use of real time data as well as satellite imagery from the hong kong observatory. early warning is passed to contractors in advance of bad weather conditions, as part of the preventive measures to ensure that works in progress do not impede drainage paths

    九鐵亦有透過使用天文臺的即時資料及衛星氣象圖，密切留意天氣變化，當預期天氣轉壞，便會向承建商事先發出警報，以便能採取適當的預防措施，確保任何工程不會影響排水系統。
  3. This article tries to solve some difficult questions in the theory of criminal law and juridical practice through research on these basic questions. the first section is the research on justifiable defense ’ s concept. concept is the foundation and prerequisite to research

    本文通過對各種有代表性的觀點進行梳理分析，對正當防衛的概念、起源、正當化根據、前提條件和主觀條件等基礎性問題做了一些研究，提出了一些有啟發意義的看法。
  4. While crow - barring my 6 ' 1 " frame into a middle seat, jostling for the armrests with who looked like ex - defensive lineman on either side of me in the window and aisle seats, my name was called on the plane ' s intercom to come to the front

    當6尺1寸的我吃力地找到一個中間座位坐下，好不容易地跟坐在我兩邊（一個靠窗，一個靠過道）的長得像防衛型跑鋒的傢伙共用到了座位扶手。
  5. Criminal responsibility is not to be borne for a defensive act undertaken against ongoing physical assault, murder, robbery, rape, kidnap, and other violent crimes that seriously endanger personal safety that causes injury or death to the unlawful infringer since such an act is not an excessive defense

    對正在進行行凶、殺人、搶劫、強奸、綁架以及其他嚴重危及人身安全的暴力犯罪，採取防衛行為，造成不法侵害人傷亡的，不屬于防衛過當，不負刑事責任。
  6. If a person acts in defence against an on - going assault, murder, robbery, rape, kidnap or any other crime of violence that seriously endangers his personal safety, thus causing injury or death to the perpetrator of the unlawful act, it is not undue defence, and he shall not bear criminal responsibility

    對正在進行行凶、殺人、搶劫、強奸、綁架以及其他嚴重危及人身安全的暴力犯罪，採取防衛行為，造成不法侵害人傷亡的，不屬于防衛過當，不負刑事責任。
  7. Moreover, in order to effectively protect lawful rights and interests and encourage citizens to carry out actively justifiable defence, our criminal law prescribes that if a person acts in defence against an on - going assault, murder, robbery, rape, kidnap and other crime of violence that seriously endangers his personal safety, thus causing injury or death to the perpetrator, it is justifiable defence instead of undue defence, and he shall not bear criminal responsibility

    此外，為了有效地保護合法權益，鼓勵公民積極進行正當防衛，我國刑法規定對于正在進行的行凶、殺人、搶劫、強奸、綁架以及其它嚴重危及人身安全的暴力犯罪，採取防衛行為造成不法侵害人傷亡的，屬于正當防衛而不是防衛過當，不負刑事責任。
  8. On the limit of justifiable defense, every country experienced a long and complicated process from loose restriction to narrow restriction, and then to loose again

    在古今中外的刑事立法上，國家在對正當防衛的強度問題上，都經歷了從限制過寬到限制較嚴，再從限制較嚴到放寬限制這樣一個復雜而漫長的演變過程。
  9. If a person ' s act of justifiable defence obviously exceeds the limits of necessity and causes serious damage, he shall bear criminal responsibility ; however, he shall be given a mitigated punishment or be exempted from punishment

    正當防衛明顯超過必要限度造成重大損害的，應當負刑事責任，但是應當減輕或者免除處罰。
  10. New research on the fault form of excessive defend

    防衛過當罪過形式新探
  11. On the concept of over - defense

    防衛過當概念探微
  12. According to this provision, it is not undue defence to the acts in defence agai t crime of violence that seriously endangers one ' s personal safety

    據此，對嚴重危及人身安全的暴力犯罪進行防衛，不存在防衛過當的問題。
  13. According to this provision, it is not undue defence to the acts in defence against crime of violence that seriously endangers one ' s personal safety

    據此，對嚴重危及人身安全的暴力犯罪進行防衛，不存在防衛過當的問題。
  14. According to this provision, iit is not undue defence to the acts in defence against crime of violence that seriously endangers one ' s personal safety

    據此，對嚴重危及人身安全的暴力犯罪進行防衛，不存在防衛過當的問題。
  15. By analyzing the regulations regarding justifiable defense in china ' s criminal law, the articles governing special defense right are believed to over - pursue utilitarian gains and these articles cannot effectively prevent unjustifiable defenses

    摘要分析了我國《刑法》有關正當防衛的規定，認為規定特殊防衛權是過分追求功利目標的表現，不能有效規制防衛過當行為。
  16. The paper also researches the principles to deal with the mistake of anticipation possibility. at last, it points out that the applicable range of the anticipation possibility includes attempt and negligence offenses. the fifth part puts forward some legislation advice about anticipation possibility and researches the constitution and disposing principles of excusable excessive defense and excusable excessive rescue

    第五部分提出了關于期待可能性的立法建議，認為有必要對期待可能性弱失的典型事由作立法上的類型化；研究了可寬看的避險過當、可寬看的防衛過當兩種喪失期待可能性的典型事由的構成要件與處斷原則，指出了二者與正當防衛、緊急避險的界限。
  17. In this part, the author to the traditional justifiable defense constitution " five important documents said " proposed the objection, but advocated new " four important documents said ", and aimed at various important documents to launch the concrete elaboration. compares each viewpoint in the analysis in the foundation, does the author to the imaginary defense crime form and processing, whether violate to the indirect principal offender and the help implements the justifiable defense, how understood justifiable defense question and so on boundary condition proposed is different in the logically coherent argument new position

    在該部分，筆者首先對傳統的正當防衛構成「五要件說」提出了異議，而主張新的「四要件說」 ，並針對各要件展開了具體論述;其次在分析比較各種觀點的基礎上，筆者對假想防衛的罪過形式及處理、對間接正犯和幫助犯能否實行正當防衛、如何理解正當防衛的限度條件等問題提出了不同於通說的新主張。
  18. First, the author analyzes several concrete questions in the general provisions and special provisions of our criminal law which often arouse arguments about whether they belong to strict liability or not. second, the author goes further into the question about whether our criminal law can hold strict liability from three aspects of the principle which crime and punishment are prescribed by law, the requisites to constitute a crime, and evidential burden

    在該部分中，筆者首先對我國刑法總則和分則中常常引發是否屬于嚴格責任之爭的幾個具體問題，如醉酒人犯罪的刑事責任、結果加重犯問題、法律知識錯誤、防衛過當與避幽丈當、強奸罪第2款的規定、巨額財產來源不明罪等，逐一進行了分析。
  19. Moreover, in order to effectively protect lawful rights and interests and encourage citize to carry out actively justifiable defence, our criminal law prescribes that if a person acts in defence agai t an on - going a ault, murder, ro ery, rape, kidnap and other crime of violence that seriously endangers his personal safety, thus causing injury or death to the perpetrator, it is justifiable defence i tead of undue defence, and he shall not bear criminal re o ibility

    此外，為了有效地保護合法權益，鼓勵公民積極進行正當防衛，我國刑法規定對于正在進行的行凶、殺人、搶劫、強奸、綁架以及其它嚴重危及人身安全的暴力犯罪，採取防衛行為造成不法侵害人傷亡的，屬于正當防衛而不是防衛過當，不負刑事責任。
  20. This thesis, relying on the traffic accident process as well as focusing on the connotation of confirmation of liability, states the concept of road traffic accident liability and its relationship with legal liability in chapter one. in chapter two, the author states specific identification of traffic accident liability, analyses qualitatively the cause of the traffic accident and analyses quantitatively the acting force of the traffic accident effect caused by its cause. in chapter three, the author demonstrates the ground for elimination of liability of person held responsible, that is, the person held traffic accident liability does n ' t bear public law liability because of unexpected possibility, unpredictable aggravated effect and negligent legal defense

    本文依託交通事故的處理過程，以責任認定的內涵為著眼點，在第一章中論述了交通事故責任的概念及其與法律責任的關系，第二章論述交通事故責任的具體認定，對交通事故原因進行了定性分析，對原因之於結果的作用力進行定量分析，第三章論證交通事故責任者法律責任的阻卻事由，即承擔交通事故責任的人，由於無期待可能性、不可預見的加重結果、過失的正當防衛等原因而不承擔公法責任，也可以因執行職務、車輛掛靠而不承擔私法責任，從而進一步闡明了交通事故責任與法律責任的區別。
分享友人
分享到 Line

分享到臉書