carrier liability for delay 中文意思是什麼

carrier liability for delay 解釋
承運人因遲延所負的責任
  • carrier : n 1 運送人，搬夫；負荷者；使役，〈美國〉信差，郵遞員；送報人；〈英國〉運輸行，運輸業者。2 傳書鴿...
  • liability : n. 1. 責任，義務。2. 〈pl. 〉 負債，債務 （opp. assets）. 3. 傾向；易於…的傾向[性質]。4. 不利條件。
  • for : FOR f o r ＝ free on rail 【商業】火車上交貨（價格）。1 〈表示目標、去向〉向，往。 leave [sail] f...
  • delay : vt 延遲，拖延，耽擱。 We ll delay the party for two week 我們要把會期延遲兩周。 The train was del...
  1. Article 57 the liability of the carrier for the economic losses resulting from delay in delivery of the goods shall be limited to an amount equivalent to the freight payable for the goods so delayed

    第五十七條承運人對貨物因遲延交付造成經濟損失的賠償限額，為所遲延交付的貨物的運費數額。
  2. Where the loss of or damage to the goods has occurred concurrently with the delay in delivery thereof, the limitation of liability of the carrier shall be that as provided for in paragraph 1 of article 56 of this code

    貨物的滅失或者損壞和遲延交付同時發生的，承運人賠償責任限額適用本法第五十六條第一款規定的限額。
  3. Since through transport involves at least two different stages of transport, it is often disputable which carrier shall be liable for cargo damage or delay in transit, and which law shall be applied for determining the carrier ' s liability, especially when the stage of loss or damage is unknown

    由於其涉及二個以上之運送階段，每當發生貨損，對于應由那一階段之運送人負賠償責任，或運送人應依那一階段之管轄法律負責，常生爭議及困擾。
  4. In the case of transport of this nature, the passenger or his successor can take action only against the carrier who performed the part of transport during which the accident or the delay occurred, save in the case where, by express agreement, the first carrier shall assume liability for the whole journey

    對前款規定的連續運輸，除合同明文約定第一承運人應當對全程運輸承擔責任外，旅客或者其繼承人只能對發生事故或者延誤的運輸區段的承運人提起訴訟。
  5. The regime of liability of carrier under the contract law, the carrier ' s responsibilities had changed to the certain degree, whether the carrier should liable for the loss of or damage to the goods, as well as from delay of delivery or not, depends on the regime of liability, this is unreasonable, we

    六、承運人的責任制度問題，承運人對貨物的滅失、損害及延遲交付所造成的損失是否應承擔責任，承擔多少責任取決于承運人的責任制度，僅因航線不同而使用不同的責任制度是不合理的，筆者建議採用完全過失責任制，但不實行推定過失。
分享友人
分享到 Line

分享到臉書