dialectical reasoning 中文意思是什麼
dialectical reasoning
解釋
辯證推理- dialectical : adj. 1. 辯證（法）的。2. 方言的。adv. -ly
- reasoning : n. 推論，推理；論究，論斷；理論，論證；論法。adj. 能推理的；有關推理的。 the reasoning power 推理力。 a reasoning creature 理性動物，人類。
-
Dialectical reasoning needs the " supervision " of analytical reasoning, otherwise it will lead to sophism
辯證理性需要分析理性的「監督」 ，否則就會淪為詭辯。 -
There are some dialectical factors in the interaction between poincare ' s intuition thinking and logic thinking, in the analysis of the distinct function of intuition in mathematical creation, especially in the analysis of double characteristics of mathematical reasoning
彭加勒對數學中直覺思維與邏輯思維的互動關系、對直覺在數學創造中的獨特作用的分析，尤其是對數學推理的兩重性的分析，包含辯證法的要素。 -
Distinguishing from formal reasoning, dialectical reasoning is a reasoning which can get definite knowledge in the discussion of problems ( topia ) by rebuttal, distinction and induction, when the legal or factual premise is absent, or the premise is controversial. in short, dialectical reasoning is an instrument to seek propositions and conclusions from possibility. in dialectical reasoning, judges often use their own judgments to find a legal or factual precondition
傳統的形式主義推理觀的機械性和局限性受到越來越多的批判，而現代法律推理學說更加關注非演繹的辯證推理在法律推理過程中的重要作用，哲學詮釋學的興起和實踐理性的復歸，也使辯證推理在各國的法律實踐中普遍運用起來，然而其明顯的價值判斷傾向使推理過程看起來過于主觀。 -
Dialectical reasoning appears to loss objectivity with the involvement of judges ’ values and this will undoubtedly shaken the foundation of the rule of law. to regain the objectivity of legal reasoning, the article firstly demonstrates the concept and characters of dialectical reasoning in the comparison with formal reasoning, and proves its advantage over formal reasoning. secondly, the writer gives a positive account of dialectical reasoning. the analysis of the nature of reasoning leads to some arguments against the objectivity of dialectical reasoning
因此本文首先將辯證推理與形式推理進行比較，明確辯證推理的概念以及辯證推理觀相對于形式推理觀的優勢，然後通過對各國的法律適用實踐的考察分析辯證推理的思維過程，並以此為基礎檢討辯證推理的客觀性，從三個角度構建辯證推理客觀性的理論基礎，最後提出了在我國法律適用實踐中保障辯證推理客觀性的三條進路，從而使文章具有實踐意義。
分享友人