grounds of decision 中文意思是什麼
grounds of decision
解釋
到出決定的理由, 判決理由-
The decision of the court of patent appeals shall contain an indication of the fact that a special permission has to be obtained for the case to be brought to the supreme administrative court and of the grounds on which such a permission may be granted
條之規定。在專利權申訴法院的裁決中將明示欲上訴至最高行政法院的案件必須取得特別授權及其取得條件。 -
After we have a superficial realization through comparatively studying legislation example of different countries and zones, this thesis begin to probe into me rule ' s principal and theory basis. stability of the decisions and respect the procedure are two principals that must be followed defending stability of the decisions is beneficial to defend stability of law relations that are caused by decision of shareholders, defend the deal safe, promote the efficiency of the companies. respecting the procedure is beneficial to present the value of the procedure, guarantee the rights and interests of shareholders from the procedure. theory basis of deciding grounds of action and dividing the kinds of action make up theory basis of the rule of rescuing laws on decision of shareholders. the final define of grounds of action that breaking the law and the constitution of company is decided by the nature of company law and the nature of constitution of company. on the nature of company law, there are some disputes, include forced law opinion, willfully law opinion and synthetic opinion considering present company law, i think the synthetic opinion is right the nature of constitution of company has two features : self - rule and ruled by law. in general, constitution of company is a kind of self - rule law that partly ruled by law
此外，本文還討論了確認決議不存在之訴與不當決議取消、變更之訴的存在價值，綜合考慮后，決定保留確認決議不存在之訴，廢除不當決議取消、變更之訴這一弊大於利的訴訟類別。除了總體探尋股東會決議瑕疵救濟制度的理論依據外，考慮到召集制度和決議方法在股東會決議制度上的重要性和二者具體內容的繁雜，本文還重點分析了召集制度上的瑕疵和決議方法上的瑕疵兩大訴由。另外，本文創設了「決議顯著不公正」這一新訴由以防止多數決的濫用，多數決的濫用多年來一直是股東會決議中的一大頑癥，但各國公司法卻一直對其缺乏明確的規制，筆者希冀以多數決的濫用造成決議顯著不公正這一現象作為訴由，並提出具有可操作性的標準，由法官裁量判斷是否構成多數決的濫用，以期彌補股東會表決制度上資本多數決原則的不足。 -
After defining the nature of company law and company constitution, we have no difficult to decide : it is possible that breaking the company law and company constitution will produce flaw decision of flaws. after considering synthetically two pairs of basic point : break the law and break the company constitution, break the entity rule and break the procedure rule, we decide divided standard of kind of action : as to all grounds of action, we classify breaking the law and breaking company constitution ; as to law, we classify breaking entity rule and procedure rule. all grounds of action that include breaking company law and breaking procedure rule of the law are brought into action on canceling decision, and as to grounds of action that the content of decision break the law, we bring them into action on invalid decision. besides, this thesis talks about the value of action on confirming the decision not exist and action on canceling a
最後，針對我國目前立法中此項制度的缺失，比較借鑒各國和地區的立法例，建構了我國的股東大會決議瑕疵救濟制度:確立了無效之訴、撤銷之訴和確認決議不存在之訴三類訴訟體制，並且設定對股東會決議中的輕微違法由法官裁量決定是否影響決議的效力，對不影響決議效力的輕微違法移交行政機關處理。此外，還對股東會決議瑕疵救濟的法律後果、該項制度的立法方式、訴訟的當事人、損害賠償問題、訴之合併及撤銷之訴的除斥期間等一一提出了自己的立法建議。 -
As a worldly rule, the rule of rescuing flaws on decision of shareholders have developed fully, and present different features in legislation of different countries and zones. comparative study on this rule of countries and zones will take us benefical inspire. this thesis mainly comparative study kinds and grounds of action in the rule of rescuing flaws on decision of shareholders, and analyse and sum up three forms on how to divide the kinds of action and grounds of action in different kinds of action, include action on invalid decision, action on canceling decision, action on confirming the decision not exist and action on canceling and changing unqualitified decision, furthermore, clarify that the grounds of action of rescuing flaws on decision of shareholders is mainly that breaking the law and company constitution in the process and content of decisions of shareholders
本文主要針對股東大會決議瑕疵救濟中的訴訟類別和訴訟事由的立法例進行了比較，並分析總結出了三種訴訟類別劃分形態和各訴訟類別即無效之訴、撤銷之訴、確認決議不存在之訴和不當決議取消、變更之訴的訴訟事由，且進一步指出了股東大會決議瑕疵救濟訴訟的訴訟事由主要為決議過程或決議內容違反章程或違反法律。在比較分析各國和地區立法例從而對該項制度有了一個粗淺的認識后，本文開始探尋該項制度的建立原則和理論依據。股東大會決議的安定性和對程序的尊重是建立股東大會決議瑕疵救濟制度必須遵循的兩大原則。 -
However, information about complex matters that should be included in the financial statements because of its relevance to the economic decision - making needs of users should not be excluded merely on the grounds that it may be too difficult for certain users to understand
然而，有些關于復雜事項的信息由於它們與使用者作經濟決策的需要相關而應包括有財務報表之中，不能僅僅因為這些信息對于某些使用者來說過于難以理解而將它們排除在財務報表之外。
分享友人