hire order 中文意思是什麼
hire order
解釋
租用單-
Article 49 where enterprises, institutions or individual industrialists and businessmen illegally hire minors who have not reached the age of sixteen, the relevant labour departments shall order such units or individuals to make corrections and shall impose fines on them ; if the circumstances are serious, the relevant administrative departments for industry and commerce shall revoke their business licenses
第四十九條企業事業組織、個體工商戶非法招用未滿十六周歲的未成年人的，由勞動部門責令改正，處以罰款；情節嚴重的，由工商行政管理部門吊銷營業執照。 -
Chapter 4 analyzes the relation of off - hire clause and employment and indemnity clause. unless the master can demonstrate the enough evidence to show it will danger the ship and crew according to the order of the charterer, he must act under the orders and directions of the charterer as regards employment and agency. if not, the delay from the master ' s decision would lead to off hire
第四章主要結合案例分析停租條款與雇傭賠償條款的關系，在除非船長能夠舉出足夠的證據表明如果遵守租船人的航行指令會危及船舶和l或船員的安全，他必須依據雇傭賠償條款遵守租船人的指令，否則就成立停租，船東就會對因此而產生的延遲損失賠償。 -
As an allocation of risk, distinct from the damage breach, the charterer has no duty to act reasonably in order to mitigate its loss and to credit any savings in cost. chapter 2 expatiates on the construction of the off - hire clause and sorts into 2 kinds - net loss of time clause and period clause, according to the test of resumption of hire
停租條款，作為一種除外條款（ beinginthenatureofanexception ） ，按照英美普通法的觀點，如果解釋起來有爭議，應作不利於租家的解釋，因為該條款是針對其純獲利益。 -
Mr li yesterday filed a lawsuit at a dongguan court calling on it to order nokia to hire him and to pay rmb500, 000 ( $ 64, 540, ? 33, 370, ? 8, 830 ) in compensation for “ mental suffering ”
李先生昨日向東莞一家法院提起訴訟，要求法院下令諾基亞僱用他，並支付50萬元人民幣（合6 . 454萬美元）的「精神損失」賠償費。 -
I should call in building, but he not very move him to still be entered every months former hire adds 100 yuan many to give me the bank ( the entering when forbidding hire ), but a few my months will do not agree with this hire, till on two months i come to ask he is moved again, two order next agreements to was moved on july 31, that day administrative office telephones to me, tenant asks to be moved, i say to want him to be moved entirely too, but do not know administrative office to do not have written record, in the late evening he brings my medium trivial worker changes door trivial to enter my room, call in my room, but tenant calls the police said to lose property, reach hair lawyer to believe he and me, excuse me law uprights elder, should be i dealt with on legal responsibility
我要收回房屋，但他不很搬出他還每月入原先租金加多100元給我銀行（不準時的入租金） ，但我幾個月來都不認同這租金，直到上兩個月我再上門要求他搬出，兩方訂下協議在7月31日搬出，在當日治理處來電話給我，承租人要求搬出，我說要他一次過全部搬出，但不知治理處沒有書面紀錄，在晚上我的中介他帶來開瑣工人換門瑣進入我房，收回我房，但承租人報警說失了財物，及發律師信給他和我，請問法律介前輩，我應不應付上法律責任 -
When the club approached in order to hire me i felt very satisfied
「在博卡的時光我感覺非常美妙，就象我最美好的時刻一樣。
分享友人