intangible standard 中文意思是什麼

intangible standard 解釋
無形的標準
  • intangible : adj. 1. 觸摸不到的,無實體的,無形的。2. 不可捉摸的,難以確定的,模糊的。n. 無形的東西,不可捉摸的東西。n. -bility ,-bly adv.
  • standard : n 1 標準,水準,規格,模範。2 旗;軍旗,隊旗;【徽章】標幟,標記;旗標,象徵。3 【植物;植物學】...
  1. Among all the viewpoints, the definition in the chinese accounting standard is the most accurate one. 2. identification of the intangible assets

    在各種關于無形資產涵義的觀點中,我國《企業會計準則- -無形資產》中的定義最為精闢,因此得到大家的認可。
  2. It is well known that along with the development of the social economy and the improvement of the living standard of the people, insurance, as one kind of intangible product, is quickly accepted by the people, and is brought into the range of mass consumables. meanwhile, for the insurance company facing internal and outside environment changes, the appearance the marketing channel in a forceful way makes its management of marketing channel relations become more complex and more challenging. this article consists of four parts : the first part introduces car insurance marketing channel mode and existing problems of company a ; the second part summarizes relevant theories about marketing channel relations, with emphasis on the concept of marketing channel, channel conflict and the principle and method for handling the conflict ; the third

    本文共有四個部分:第一部分介紹a公司車險營銷渠道模式及存在的問題;第二部分概述營銷渠道關系管理的相關理論,對理論的概述主要從營銷渠道概念、渠道沖突、處理渠道沖突的原則和方法等部分進行;第三部分介紹了a公司車險營銷渠道產生的背景,並運用第二章的相關渠道理論對公司現有車險營銷渠道存在的問題進行詳細分析;第四部分是公司的車險營銷渠道策略探討,首先對a公司作了swot分析,明確公司的優勢與劣勢,面對的機會和威脅,然後對a公司在未來時間里車險營銷渠道發展和營銷渠道管理方法提出建議,即:充分利用股東優勢,在加強對傳統代理渠道的管理和控制的同時,構建一個以4s店為主的控製程度相對高的多渠道結構的營銷體系。
  3. Thus there are two areas of concern : firstly, although criminal prosecutions or administrative means have already been carried out, the infringement has occurred and the interests of the obligee has been violated. without setting definite areas of indemnification due to the infringement, the interests of the obligee cannot be assured and on the other hand, it can not prevent further torts. secondly, in evaluating the indemnification of the torts, there is no standard or scope which can cause difficulty in judicial judgment, especially in the evaluation of the intangible injury or the injury which cannot be enumerated, and in the evaluation of the evidence that causes injury

    在過去多年的司法實踐表明,單憑刑事和行政手段,未必能完全保護知識產權權利人之利益,這里有兩個方面思考:第一,即使作出了刑事和行政手段,有關的侵害行為可能已經作出,並導致權利人利益受損,在沒有規范侵權人需要為侵權行為所承擔的賠償范圍,一方面未能保障權利人之利益,另一方面也未能產生阻嚇作用,提升預防功能;第二,對侵權行為進行損害賠償計算時,並沒有統一標準和范圍,對于司法審判造成一定難度,尤其是對于非財產損害之計算、造成損失之舉證和無法列明之損失各個方面,也使法官在確定損害賠償金額時,需要考慮和注意的問題。
分享友人