procedure after trial 中文意思是什麼
procedure after trial
解釋
審后程序-
The current public prosecution mode in our country took shape from the past whole case - examine mode in the base of the thinking to get ride of the drawbacks in the past. in practice, it has not only become effective and cause out a lot of new defaults, for example, the definition of the main evidence is not clear, the transfer range of the case files is unclear and the stipulate of the examine consequence is not enough. in order to reform and perfect the current public prosecution mode, we should regard the theory of the public prosecution as guide, combine our country ' s conditions, on methodology jump out of the circle relatively drawing lessons from the past, on the procedural theory, change the idea that the forejudge caused from the substantive examination and clarify the objective fact the current public prosecution include the essential substantive examination, in practice regard legitimacy, rationality and flexibility as the principle of law enforcement before the law to revise, in legislation define the concept of the main evidence clearly, add the regulation to dispatch the examine judge and the trial judge, regulate the treatment methods after examination and revise some rules about the summary procedure
以公訴審查制度的訴訟理念為指導，結合我國的國情，對現行公訴審查模式的改革和完善，在方法論上跳出以往比較借鑒的圈子；在訴訟理念上改變過去庭審法官預斷必然緣于實體性審查的觀念，以澄清現行公訴審查模式包括必要的實體審的客觀事實；在實踐中以合法性、合理性和靈活性作為立法修改前的執法原則；在立法上明確界定主要證據的范圍是對證明犯罪是否成立起主要作用或有重要影響的證據，其中既包括有罪證據也包括無罪證據，增加規定公訴審查法官與正式庭審法官分立制度，補充規定對公訴審查后開庭審理之外的其它情況的處理方法以及對於人民法院在審理過程中發現不宜適用簡易程序的，取消原刑訴法應當按照一般公訴案件適用的普通審判程序重新審理的規定，改為由審理該案件的獨任審判員以外的審判員重新組成合議庭對該案件進行重新審理等。 -
Establishing the pre - trial review procedure after the procuratorial agency ' s prosecution and before the official court trial, is the particular requirements and performance of fairness and efficiency while designing and performancing the criminal system as well as the reasonable restriction to the national power of prosecution and the proper safeguard to the dependant ` s rights in the modern society
我國1996年刑事訴訟法對原庭前審查制度作了較大修改，其弱化庭前審查程序並不符合各國立法的一般發展趨勢。針對現行刑事訴訟庭前審查程序中存在的諸多缺陷，文章最後提出了建構我國刑事預審程序的若干設想。 -
The value of pretrial procedure. pretrial procedure is the litigation activity in which parts of the cases will be solved before brought to court after the people ' s court accepts it, under the instruction and supervision of judges, in order to justly and efficiently get ready for a centralized trial at court through exchanging opinions and claims between clients, collecting and exchanging evidences, sifting and separating evidences to exclude some undisputable evidences, facts and requests, making clear of the facts, evidences and focus of dispute
審前程序是指人民法院受理民事案件后至開庭審理前，在法官的指導監督下，通過當事人相互交換各自的主張、請求，收集、交換證據，發揮過篩分流作用，使一部分案件于庭前獲得解決，對需要開庭審理的案件通過排除無爭議的證據、事實、主張，明確事實問題、證據問題和案件的爭議焦點即審理對象，為公正高效地集中庭審作好準備的訴訟活動。 -
In the second part, the author analyses the existing issue and reason in the mutual procedure of the two kinds of power. at present, there exist three malice phenomena that are mutual filtrate, mutual evasion and mutual invasion, the author, after deeply analyzing our country ’ s history, cultural tradition, contemporary judicial system ’ s malady and the defects of administrative procedural system, rationally criticizes the malice mutual phenomena in the execution of administrative trial power and administrative power
闡析當前我國行政審判權與行政權互動過程中存在互相滲透、互相規避、互相僭越等三種惡性互動表現，從我國歷史、文化傳統、現行司法體制的弊端和行政訴訟制度存在的問題等四個方面深入剖析成因，特別是結合當前行政審判實際，對我國《行政訴訟法》頒布以來辦理案件情況進行分析研究，理性批判現實中行政審判權與行政權行使的惡性互動現象。
分享友人