social judgment theory 中文意思是什麼
social judgment theory
解釋
社會性判斷論-
About the selective accessible theory of social judgment
社會判斷的選擇通達理論 -
Take the marxism as the important content and the theory instruction socialism ideology, is our country society ' s mainstream ideology, but in the new historical period, the socialism ideology is facing social reforming, the system innovation, the members of different social classes thought idea change and the economical globalization and so on many impacts and the challenge which brings, therefore, how further advances our country ideology construction, consolidates and strengthens the marxism in the ideology domain instruction status is important issue which the time proposed, only then persists pace with time, requests by the time comprehensively to carefully examine the new situation and the challenge which the current ideology construction faces, by the judgment science which develops grasps the mainstream ideology the essential connotation and the law of development, by the spirit which innovates positively impels the mainstream ideology the theory consummation and the practice innovation, can make our country mainstream ideology to maintain the vigorous vitality and the exuberant vigor throughout
以馬克思主義為重要內容和理論指導的社會主義意識形態，是我國社會的主流意識形態，但在新的歷史時期，社會主義意識形態正面臨著社會轉型，體制創新，社會成員思想觀念變化及經濟全球化等帶來的諸多沖擊與挑戰，因此，如何進一步推進我國意識形態建設，鞏固和加強馬克思主義在意識形態領域的指導地位是時代提出的重大課題，只有堅持與時俱進，以時代的要求全面審視當前意識形態建設所面臨的新的情況與挑戰，以發展的眼光科學把握主流意識形態的本質內涵和發展規律，以創新的精神積極推動主流意識形態的理論完善與實踐創新，才能使我國主流意識形態始終保持蓬勃的生機和旺盛的活力。 -
Social judgment theory
社會性判斷論 -
Restorative criminal responsibility needs and can obtain the reasonable annotation in elementary theory issues of criminal law, such as the law profit, crime essence, criminal activity legal relationship and legal responsibility : ( 1 ) the crime of violating the individual law profit is not the violation that aims at the abstract national or social entity, but aims at the individuals ; ( 2 ) " inspiring the authority " is not the basic task of the modern civil rights criminal law, maintaining victim ' s rights and interests and safeguarding that of criminal ’ s are “ two sides of the whole body ” of modern criminal law functions, neglecting any side at the same time inevitably enable the criminal judicature not to sink into region of the righteousness ; ( 3 ) in the concrete criminal activity legal relationship, the crime victim is the natural subject, the related country judicial organ is the subject of investigating the crime responsibility, or that of the judgment or execution, country in the overall significance cannot become the subject ; ( 4 ) repair and compensation of the crime harm is by no means a matter of civil liability, but is the basic entity burden of the legal responsibility which the criminal must shoulder
恢復性刑事責任需要且能夠在法益與犯罪本質、刑事法律關系及刑事責任等刑法基本理論問題上得到合理詮釋: （ 1 ）侵害個人法益犯罪並不是針對抽象的國家或社會實體的侵害，而是針對私人的侵害; （ 2 ） 「重振權力」不是現代民權刑法的基本任務，保障與維護受害人和犯罪人合法權益是現代刑事法功能之一體兩面，忽視任何一面勢必使刑事司法陷於不義之境地; （ 3 ）在具體刑事法律關系中，犯罪受害人是當然主體，有關國家司法機關是犯罪責任之追訴或裁判或執行主體，整體意義上的國家並不能成為主體; （ 4 ）犯罪損害的修復與賠償並非民事責任的事情，而是犯罪人應當擔負的刑事責任之基本的實體性負擔。 -
Not being in support of abundant social and political conditions is the factor on one hand, the theory hypothesis that court mediation and judgment are juxtaposed modes of trial in civil procedural system is on the other. it has not revealed the essence that judicature has always been political tool, neither has it given enough theoretical guide to judicature practice
其中一個重要原因在於， 「民事訴訟中並列存在調解與判決兩種不同性質的審判方式」的理論預設，使民事訴訟的理論批判未能揭示我國司法作為權力技術的本來面目，而以此為據的司法改革實踐也不過是以法律的面目表現的國家治理的正當化策略。
分享友人