substantial proof 中文意思是什麼

substantial proof 解釋
確實證據
  • substantial : adj 1 實質的，真正的；【哲學】實在的，實體的，本體的，本質的。2 有財產的，有資產的；有真價的，有...
  • proof : n 1 證明；證據；【法律】證件；【法律】（口頭或書面）證詞，證言。2 檢驗，考驗；驗算；檢定的品質[強...
  1. The theory and legislation of proof limitation system is an important part of proof burden system and the judicial procedure of civil law. due to its conflict with substantial justice, the system of time limit for proof limitation could make the judgment of value and realize its value of rational justice only in the litigation notion of justice of formalities

    任何制度的存在和發展都應有其內在的價值取向，作為訴訟程序制度內容一部分的舉證時限制度，由於與實質正義的立場存有一定的對立性，其本身也只有在程序正義的訴訟理念下，才能發揮其價值評價的功效，才能夠在追尋結果的過程中達到一種相對平衡的理性正義價值。
  2. The structure and framework of this paper set out in the order of burden of proof in marine cargo claim, focusing on the substantial points laid down above which need to be proved. the detailed discussion and analysis keep in line with the questions of " who bear the burden of proof ? when does the burden of proof occur

    第三部分首先是對在海商法方面，對國際航運最具影響的國際公約《海牙規則凡《海牙威斯比規則》及《漢堡規則》下舉證責任問題的分析，比較了《規則》對各項實體事實的條文規定的異同，並通過各國判例的比較，進一步分析各國司法實踐中在適用各個國際公約對案件進行審理時所採的態度之異同。
  3. In the next part, because burden of proof is a juristic problem not a matter - of - fact problem this paper will further to define burden of proof as finding the real possessor of right in substantial law. and the writer thinks that burden of proof is part of juristic hermeneutics

    因此，在文章的第三部分，筆者分析了舉證責任分配的依據、舉證責任分配的實質? ?法律解釋學的一個分支，並由此確定了舉證責任分配的標準? ?文義解釋、比較法解釋和目的解釋。
  4. Upon the above views, this paper compares academic thoughts on allotment of burden of proof between the civil law system and the common law system, thus reaching the view that the principal of " classification of legal element " supplemented by other substantial standards on the burden of proof shall be adopted. this principle shall be the main ground for the court to decide merits of the case within its discretion, especially in the circumstance where there is no sufficiently substantial rules on burden of proof in the statute. the burden of proof in marine cargo claim shall adopt the same principle accordingly

    在此基礎上，比較分析了大陸法系和英美法系國家舉證責任分配各學說，提出我國應采「法律要件分類說」為主，以實質標準為補充的舉證責任分配原則，這一舉證責任分配原則應當作為法院在審理案件時在缺乏實體法舉證責任規則規定的情況下，在對訴訟當事人舉證責任進行分配時應當遵循的總「指揮棒」 ；同樣應作為我國海運貨損索賠舉證責任分配之一般原則。
  5. In the cargo claim proceeding, the burden of proof is through out all the process of proceeding. according to the cargo claim practice, the claimant or the carrier shall adduce the evidence to prove the following substantial aspects : 1

    因此對論述結構、體例的安排也是以海運貨損索賠舉證順序為主線，就索賠方與承運人在具體訴訟中需要加以舉證的以上幾個方面的實體要件事實，始終圍繞著「誰來舉證？
  6. It is submitted that the task of burden of proof is to meet the following legal philosophies, namely purposes of substantial law, the atmost closeness to the fact in a judgment, justice of procedures and efficiency of procedures

    提出舉證責任分配應盡量實現以下幾個價值目標：即實現實體法的宗旨、使裁判最大限度地貼近事實、程序公正及程序效益等價值目標。
  7. Shifting the burden of proof of is the special provision and exception of the principle of burden of proof, during drafting " civil evidence code ", divergences about how to regulate the burden of proof appear, jurists have diffirent opinions on it, this paper set out from those divergences and disputes, discussing in detail with six sections : the disputes on the shifting the burden of proof, reasonable define the conception about shifting the burden of proof, the relation of shifting the burden of proof and deduction, shifting the burden of proof in present law and regulations, the function of shifting the burden of proof and the civil cases suitable for this regulation, legislative proposition. this artical elabrates the theoretical and realistic foundation of shifting the burden of proof. moreover, shifting the burden of proof is a phenomenon of proceeding and other regulations of solution to disputation, it is not confined to those laws and regulations of procedure, but also exist in substantial law

    舉證責任倒置是舉證責任分配規則中的特殊與例外，在民事證據法的草擬過程中對舉證責任倒置的存廢與否產生了分歧，法學界對此的觀點也呈現出百花齊放的態勢，本文從舉證責任倒置爭議與分歧的觀點出發，基於舉證責任倒置存在與否的爭議、舉證責任倒置概念的合理界定、舉證責任倒置與推定的關系、舉證責任倒置在我國現行法律中的體現、舉證責任倒置的功能及可適用民事案件的具體類型、舉證責任倒置立法完善的構想共六個部分具體闡述，從理論角度、司法實踐及立法構想三個不同的視角分析舉證責任倒置在我國的存在的理論意義、現實意義與立法前景，表明舉證責任倒置不僅在我國具有立法基礎而且有實踐環境，闡述舉證責任倒置雖然是出現于訴訟或是解決爭議的其他程序中的一個現象，但它又不局限於訴訟及其他解決爭議的程序規范，從現有的法律規范及法律實踐來看，舉證責任倒置與實體法是「同呼吸，共命運」的，用句老話說就是「皮之不存，毛將焉附? 」
  8. Author tries to analyze the substantial forming elements of the medical damage, the allocation of proof duty and the extent of compensation

    文章的大部分篇幅討論了醫療損害的構成要件及舉證責任分配、賠償范圍問題。
分享友人
分享到 Line

分享到臉書