判明責任 的英文怎麼說

中文拼音 [pànmíngzérèn]
判明責任 英文
ascertain the responsibility
  • 判 : Ⅰ動詞1 （分開; 分辨） distinguish; discriminate 2 （評定） judge; decide 3 （判決） sentence; con...
  • 明 : Ⅰ形容詞1 （明亮） bright; brilliant; light 2 （明白;清楚） clear; distinct 3 （公開;顯露在外;不隱...
  • 責 : Ⅰ名詞（責任） duty; responsibility Ⅱ動詞1 （要求做成某事或行事達到一定標準） demand; ask for; req...
  • 任 : 任名詞（姓氏） a surname
  • 責任 : 1. （應做的事） duty; responsibility 2. （應承擔的過失） responsibility for a fault or wrong; blame
  1. Finally, delivery of cargo without original bills of lading promote the development of shipping in a way in practice, it has reasonability in existence. chapter three is writer ' s study for 10 leading cases of chinese maritime court and court of cassation concerning delivery of cargo without original bills of lading, writer conclude as follows : chinese courts are inclined to regard it as breach of contract but not in tort in judicial practice ; chinese courts allow the plaintiff to choose to sue in tort or of breach ; chinese courts have abandoned the viewpoint of " who holder the bills who must have the right to sue " or " who holder the bills who must win the case " ; and in many cases concerning delivery of cargo without original bills of lading, the court ignored plaintiff ' s actions against the carrier, it proved that carrier can escape reasonability of delivery of cargo without original bills of lading in some cases

    第三章論述我國海事法院及其上級法院就無單放貨案件審理的司法審判實踐研究，通過對十個法院判例的分析、歸納，筆者認為，在司法實踐中，法院越來越傾向于將無單放貨糾紛視為運輸合同糾紛處理，而不認定為侵權行為糾紛；法院允許原告起訴時以侵權起訴或違約起訴作出選擇；法院對提單持有人的訴權認定，已經不採用「誰持有提單誰就有訴權」與「誰持有提單就能保證勝訴」的觀點；有諸多的無單放貨的訴訟案例以被法院駁回起訴為結局，證明了無單放貨在特定情況下的合理性以及承運人有避免承擔責任的可能性。
  2. As the important constituent of the presumption rule, fact presumption is a rule of when the fact prove falls into the difficult position, according to the deduction by the common sense, the judge forms a temporarily inner conviction to the factum probandum under the proof standard, and shifts the subjective burden of proof between the litigants, thus helps the part to overcome the condition of facts prove

    作為事實認定的重要組成部分，事實推定是裁判者在案件事實的證明陷入困境時，根據經驗法則進行推理，在證明標準之下，暫時形成對案件待證事實的心證，並在當事人之間轉移主觀證明責任，從而避免訴訟陷入僵局，排除當事人舉證困難的證明法則。
  3. The third part of this article mainly discusses the causal relationship in market manipulation, which is a block of the enforcement of the law against market fraudulences. because market manipulation is a kind of special tort, the author agree on the use of the " proof to the contrary " theory to lighten the proof burden of the damaged party in causal relationship. besides, this part also discusses such issues as how to decide the scope of legal plaintiffs, how to assess the losses of the damaged party

    本文第三部分「操縱市場的因果關系研究」從民法一般的因果關系理論入手，並結合操縱市場的侵權行為中因果關系的特殊性，論述了操縱市場的侵權行為中因果關系是否成立的判斷標準，並主張對因果關系在民事訴訟中舉證責任的分配應突破「法律要件分類說」的要求，適用因果關系舉證責任倒置的做法，即由操縱市場案件中的被告負擔證明責任成立因果關系不成立的舉證責任，否則即推定因果關系成立。
  4. Anyhow, the trial practice in the passed 10 or more years proved that our country ' s system of evidential burden of administrative action still needs to perfect in many aspects

    但是，十幾年來的審判實踐證明，我國的行政訴訟舉證責任制度尚有許多不完善的地方。
  5. In continental law system countries, burden of proof includes burden of adducing evidence, burden of persuasion. burden of adducing evidence means that the subjects in criminal procedure who initiate trial procedure and require the courts to judge according to their demands or subject whom there is presumption against must adduce adequate " evidence of the fact to prove that the evidence is on the demand of proof. otherwise the subjects will fail in the suit

    筆者認為，刑事訴訟證明責任，是指在刑事訴訟中引起審判程序啟動並要求法院依其主張裁判或存在對其不利之法律推定的刑事訴訟主體，必須就其主張的對定罪量刑具有決定作用的待證特定事實或者為推翻不利的推定事實提出足夠證據，並利用證據對該事實或或者為推翻不利的推定事實加以證明到法律規定的程度。
  6. The third chapter mainly focuses on the civil indemnity liability originating from the securities manipulation. to begin with, the first part ascertains that such kind of torts generally trepasses on the object of so - called " pure economic interest ' mn next part, it demonstrates in detail the requisites with which would incur a civil damage liability. regarding the fault ( including both intention and negligence ), it put forward a viewpoint that we should impose the civil liability upon manipulations of chinese securities market on the basis of constructive fault principle. about the question of iniuria ( wrong ), the author studies two aspects, one is assumption of risk, the other is the model of determining iniuria and solutions proposed

    其中第一節首先明確了操縱市場這種侵權行為的客體即所謂「純粹財產上利益」 。第二節具體闡明了操縱市場行為民事賠償責任的構成要件。在過錯部分提出要以推定過失責任原則為基礎追究我國證券市場操縱行為的民事責任，違法部分研究了自甘冒險行為和違法認定模式及對策兩個問題，其中違法認定模式是一個創新，對改變我國目前證券市場民事索賠必須先由證監會認定違法的機制給予了批判。
  7. In this article, firstly the background of the textile trade conflicts within sino - us or sino - euro are introduced, thus learn that how to discern and dodge the foreign trade risks, how to choose the appropriate investment projects have already become one of the most important questions for exporting companies on foreign trade affairs well - known as high investment and high risk. so the main text makes a risk analysis qualitatively and quantitatively on a textile - exporting trading company from three angles of statistic 、 game theory and portfolio theory, which is the main content that we studied. firstly, the statistic article adopts data of the transaction closing price of the textile clothing index in shenzhen stock exchange at the end of each quarter as well as several other kinds of data reflecting the macro - economic changes, performs an empirical analysis of these data according to the theory of co - integration test 、 granger cause test and impulse response function of time series in economitric, and learn that the impact to ti is more obvious by the economic index reflecting local commodity price level and economic prosperity degree home and abroad, as well as the impact degree and the time lag degree, and knows the macro - economic risks faced by textile business enterprises ; after that by the game theory angle we analyze exactly the managing risks faced by one textile export corporation named beauty. from the game expansion chart the system arrangement between censor ways by exportation goal countries and exporting strategies by the exporting enterprises has been analyzed. involving the benefit assignment between them both the limited rounds and infinite rounds negotiations of cooperation games have been studied, and then country responsibility and the enterprise managing risks on foreign trade affairs and so on have been analyzed exactly ; in order to realize the investment multiplication in the certain degree to disperse the risk, the

    本文首先介紹了中美、中歐紡織品貿易爭端的來龍去脈，由此可知在涉外貿易這種以高投入、高風險著稱的行業里，如何甄別和規避外貿風險、如何選擇合適的投資項目已經成為外貿企業的首要問題。因此，正文分別從統計學、博弈論和投資組合三種角度對涉外紡織品貿易公司風險進行了定性和定量的分析，這也是本文的主要研究內容。首先，統計學篇選取了深圳證券交易所行業分類指數?紡織服裝指數（ ti ）每一季度末的交易收盤價和若干種反映宏觀經濟變化的指標，利用計量經濟學中時間序列的協整檢驗、 granger因果檢驗和脈沖反應函數等理論做實證分析，從而得知反映國內物價水平和國內外經濟景氣程度的經濟指標對紡織板塊上市值的沖擊比較明顯，且可知沖擊程度和時滯度，進而分析出涉外紡織企業所面臨的宏觀經濟風險;接著，從博弈論的角度具體分析一家紡織品出口公司（ beauty ）的外貿活動所面臨的各種經營風險，該篇從博弈擴展圖入手，分析了出口目的國審查方式與本企業出口策略之間的制度安排;並圍繞雙方的利益分配，研究了有限回合和無限回合合作談判博弈，然後具體論述了國家責任和企業涉外經營風險等問題;在一定程度上為了實現投資多元化來分散風險的目的，投資組合篇從經典的markowitz模型著手，在一些特定條件的限制下，給出了一個相應的投資組合模型。
  8. In the writer ' s opinion, presumption of innocence should be stated " everyone is innocent before he is proved and pronounced guilty, its extended meanings include, ( 1 ) the defendant is the main part and has qualifications in lawsuit. ( 2 ) the accusing party has the responsibility to offer evidence. ( 3 ) the priviledge against selfincrimination and right to silence are considered

    筆者認為無罪推定原則的科學表述為任何人未經證實並判決有罪之前，應視為無罪，它所引申出的訴訟規則主要包括（一）被告人具有獨立的訴訟地位和訴訟主體資格； （二）由控訴方負主要證明責任； （三）反對自我歸罪及沉默權規則； （四）疑罪從無原則。
  9. Recently, influenced by the advanced legal system, it has some successful experiences in our trial. based on the successful experiences, it is necessary to perfect our burden of proof in media defamation

    近年來，隨著我國對證明責任認識的深化，並受各國先進制度的影響，我國的審判實踐中出現了一些比較成功的案例。
  10. Based on the comprehensive research on the theory and practice of insider trading in foreign countries, hong kong and taiwan, the thesis puts foreword that the assumed liability system shall be applicable to insider trading in line with the general tort theory. in consideration of the constitutional elements, the thesis also brings forward that the damage facts shall be measured by actual loss, the deduction of cause and effect : relationship shall be regulated in line with law, and that the existence of default shall be inferred from the strict objective standard

    在對國外和我國港臺地區關于內幕交易民事責任理論和實踐進行綜合比較的基礎上，本文依據侵權責任的一般理論，提出內幕交易侵權責任應適用過錯推定責任原則，在內幕交易民事責任要件方面提出以實際可得財產損失確定損害事實、以法定的推定方式證明因果關系、以嚴格的客觀標準來判斷過錯存在的基本作法。
  11. It is not many scholars to clearly prove the opinion of shifting the burden of proof, on the contrary the contradictory scholars are more prominent, for example the vice professor of southwest politics and law university, chengang, wuyue who translates and introduces the burden of proof of germany, because them there are more and more people support the opposite opinion, while in the draft of " civil evidence code ", the traditional idea win, in this draft the legislator abides by the present justice and our country ' s native circumstance, they made an scientific choice, of course, the burden of proof will directly influence the party " s possibility of losing the lawsuit, while the regulation of shifting the burden of proof increases the plaintiff ' s opportunity to win a lawsuit. to explain what is the shifting of burden of proof, the paper use the civil law as the example to point out the " reverse " is not entirly relieve the plaintiff s obligation of producing evidence, but in certain extent and in certain range make the defendant bear the burden of producing those proofs from the reverse way, which are originally beard by the plaintiff. in the three proceeding law, shifting the burden of proof have some differences, but the interior spirits are coincident - for the values of social justice and the legal reason

    論證舉證責任倒置的學者觀點明確並且論證十分充分的不多，相反卻是對此著書立說予以反駁的學者較為突出，如西南政法大學的副教授陳則博士，翻譯並介紹德國證明責任學說的吳越先生均是目前國內對舉證責任倒置持否定態度的代表人物，由於他們的推動使得國內持此說的人越來越多，但在《民事證據法（草案） 》的擬定過程中，並未采責任倒置的地位，這樣的立法選擇是建立在對我國法律實現的本土環境客觀認識的基礎上的科學選擇，誠然，舉證責任的分配直接影響到當事人在訴訟中的敗訴風險，而「倒置」規則的設計，則在此問題上增加了原告勝訴的籌碼，在理解何為舉證責任倒置時，本文著重以民事法為主線，指出這種「倒置」並非全部免除原告的證明責任，而是在一定范圍與一定程度上將通常應由原告負擔的舉證責任轉由被告從反方面承擔，舉證責任倒置在三大訴訟法中所體現的具體情形有所差異，但它們的內在精神是一致的?法律的理性與社會公平價值，在民事訴訟中舉證責任倒置的情形，一般總是將其局限於特殊侵權情形，而忽略了民事合同違約責任的訴訟中的原告也無須對被告應承擔違約責任的所有要件，對被告主觀上的過錯實行推定，若被告予以否定則應對其無過錯的證據舉證，在設置舉證責任倒置的規則時，從各國的立法經驗與法的內在價值要求可以總結出以下幾個原則:程序法與實體法結合原則，公平原則，訴訟經濟原則，保護弱者原則等，基於此完善舉證責任倒置的規則時首先應肯定舉證責任倒置的概念，其次立法應避免求大求全，再次要配合實體法的發展，最後還可以在司法領域嘗試判例的指導意義。
  12. The precondition of studying the distribution of burden of proof in civil lawsuit is to correctly set theoretical definitions for burden of proof as well as the object of burden of proof. going through various viewpoints upon the distribution of burden of proof, they, guided by the substantive law and the principle of justice and fairness, have respective limitations, they strive for the predictability and stability of law, but unavoidably face the problem of little flexibility, which might make the results not so fair, the substantive standards highlight a great flexibility, but might cause careless judge due to the uncertainty of standards

    綜觀證明責任分配諸說，雖均以符合實體法宗旨與公平正義原則為指導思想，但各有其局限，形式性標準致力於實現法的可預測性與穩定性，但卻不可避免地存在靈活性不足的問題，可能使證明責任負擔的結果有欠公平，實質性標準實現了靈活性的長處，卻又存在因標準不確定導致法官恣意裁判危及正義的可能。
  13. The courts judge according to burden of proof that the party who has the burden of proof will fail if the fact to be proved is still in doubt

    法官在案件待證事實真偽不明、訴訟程序用盡的條件下，將以證明責任為依據，判決承擔證明責任的一方敗訴。
  14. Firstly, with regard to the term " clearly knowing the man who is innocent hut letting him be prosecuted " refers to registering and investigating someone, adopting criminal compulsory measures for him even initiating a public prosecution without or shortage of any facts or evidence in order to reach the goal to investigate his criminal responsibility

    首先，關于「對明知是無罪的人而使他受追訴」 ，是指在沒有或缺少事實和證據的基礎上對無罪的人進行立案偵查、採取刑事強制措施、提起公訴以及進行審判等，以達到追究其刑事責任的目的。
  15. Analysis customer / consumer complaint, judge the responsible party. inform related mfg plant after getting definite root cause within 3 days. track cap and work with scmc qar on effectiveness of cap

    對客戶/消費者投訴進行分析，判斷責任方，並在明確根本原因后三天內將投訴信息及時通知生產廠。追蹤更正行動，和scmc的qar一起確認更正行動的有效性。
  16. In practice, japanese court sustains that the " tail to perform due contractual obligations " should be the standard in determining liability, while most of the other countries follow the general causation principle in tort by contrast, this article will show that, since both of them apply " duty of care " as the standard, in effect the burden of producing evidence is of little difference in either case

    筆者認為，由於兩種責任在認定醫療過失時均以違反注意義務為要件，在舉證責任上也差別不大，因此明確醫生所負有的合理技能與適當注意義務的性質及其程度才是問題的關鍵所在。醫療過失認定標準的特殊性部分，重新認識了傳統侵權法中判斷過失基準的「合理人」標準。
  17. Although the author, who works as a judge, cannot keep up with those working for theoretic studies, she has chosen this question for discussion for the purpose of learning with an eye on the actual requirement to solve those puzzling problems in judicial practices

    筆者來自於審判一線，學術水平遠不及理論工作者，但出於解決審判實踐中難點問題的實際需要，本著學習的目的選擇了這一課題。證明責任分配問題的提出，是由於案件事實真偽不明的客觀存在。
  18. The values of the theory on the distribution of burden of proof lie in that such a theory can provide the judge with a concise and shortcut disposal scheme according with equity and justice in allusion to facts that cannot be clarified

    證明責任分配理論的價值，在於這種理論能夠針對無法查明的事實，為審判者提供一個明確、快捷、符合公平、正義的處理方案。
  19. In the case neither plaintiff nor defendant have persuaded the trier of fact about whether a particular fact exists, to say that one party shall lose the case is the key point of the question of the burden of proof, it is the last remedy ( " ultima ratio " )

    風險的預設和最終承擔需要明確和公平的規則，證據法中的證明責任問題即針對上述問題進行研究。可以說，證明責任判決是「最後的救濟（ ultimaratio ） 」 。法諺「證明責任是民事訴訟的脊樑」 ，足見證明責任在民事訴訟中的重要性。
  20. Standard of proof is the situation that the procedural subjects in burden of proof use proofs to prove fact in issue and argue their claims so that a judge can produce his inner convince to judge the case true or false

    證明標準是指法律關于負有證明責任的訴訟主體運用證據證明爭議事實、論證訴訟主張達到何種程度，方能使審判者形成內心確信，從而確認待證事實為真或偽的程度性要求。
分享友人
分享到 Line

分享到臉書