排斥存取 的英文怎麼說

中文拼音 [bèichìcúnqǔ]
排斥存取 英文
exclusive access
  • 排 : 排構詞成分。
  • 斥 : Ⅰ動詞1 （責備） upbraid; scold; blame; reproach; denounce; reprimand 2 （驅逐; 排斥; 使離開） rep...
  • 存 : 動詞1 （存在; 生存） exist; live; survive 2 （儲存; 保存） store; keep 3 （蓄積; 聚集） accumulat...
  • 取 : Ⅰ動詞1 （拿到身邊） take; get; fetch 2 （得到; 招致） aim at; seek 3 （採取; 選取） adopt; assume...
  • 排斥 : repel; exclude; reject; eject; discriminate against; repulsion; aversion
  1. Analysis the reason, the first factor is the contradiction inside the structure of the revenue from tax legal doctrine, the administrative power of the revenue from tax extended continuously, overstepped the barrier that revenue from tax legal doctrine had established

    剖析原因，一是稅收法定主義的內部構架固有的沖突，稅收通過法的形式獲得合法性和強制力，同時又對法存在一種天生排斥力，稅收行政權在譖取稅收立法權的過程中得到不斷擴張、膨脹，超越了稅收法定主義設置的道道藩籬。
  2. Concretely, the main problems into which construction of moral education content system in universities run is : 1 ) excessively emphasizing on political education, narrowing the function of moral education content ; 2 ) excessively emphasizing on social adaptability education, neglecting the individual value in moral education content ; 3 ) excessively emphasizing on idea education, excluding reality tendency of moral education content

    具體來說，當前高校德育內容構建存在的主要問題是：片面強調政治教育，窄化了德育內容的功能；片面強調社會適應性教育，忽視了德育內容的個體價值取向；片面強調理想教育，排斥了德育內容的現實取向。這些問題產生的原因是多方面的，其中一個重要的原卜自嘉喜尋；非二二蘭。
  3. Three litigation certified concepts have their own background, through the comparative analysis among formal true concept, external true concept and legal true concept, it is clearly testified that formal true concept only has half sense, and cannot satisfies the requirement of modern litigation, therefore it cannot be the concept of modern litigated certification. the main defects of formal true concept are replacing reality by ideality, magnifying the cognition ability of lawsuit truth of human beings, violating the requirement of program value concept, and blocking the development of the modern judicatory reformation. legal true concept dose not exclude the formal true concept, and it a ccords with the cognition relativism, litigation certified relativism and program value concept, therefore, it can be the directive litigation certified concept of china ' s judicatory reformation

    訴訟證明標準理論研究應從證明標準理念、證明訴訟的法律規定和證明標準的現實把握三個層面進行，訴訟證明標準理念包括形式真實理念、法律真實理念和客觀真實理念，三種訴訟證明理念各有其形成的時代背景，通過對形式真實理念、客觀真實理念和法律真實理念全面的比較分析，可以清晰明了地證明，形式真實理念充其量具有半理性的特徵，不能滿足現代訴訟的要求，因而不可能作為現代訴訟證明理念；客觀真實理念存在的主要缺陷是用理想代替現實，誇大了人對案件事實的認識能力，違背了程序價值理論的要求，與目前的司法改革的價值取向發生沖突，阻礙了當前司法改革的進程；法律真實理念並不排斥客觀真實理念，符合認識相對論、訴訟證明相對論和程序價值理論，因此應作為指導我國司法改革的訴訟證明理念。
分享友人
分享到 Line

分享到臉書