法院主事官 的英文怎麼說
中文拼音 [fǎyuànzhǔshìguān]
法院主事官
英文
master of the court- 法 : Ⅰ名詞1 (由國家制定或認可的行為規則的總稱) law 2 (方法; 方式) way; method; mode; means 3 (標...
- 院 : 名詞1 (院子) courtyard; yard; compound 2 (某些機關和公共處所的名稱) a designation for certain...
- 事 : 名1 (事情) matter; affair thing; business 2 (事故) trouble; accident 3 (職業;工作) job; wor...
- 法院 : court of justice; law court; court; courthouse
-
An elderly female, no more young, left the building of the courts of chancery, king s bench, exchequer and common pleas, having heard in the lord chancellor s court the case in lunacy of potterton, in the admiralty division the summons, exparte motion, of the owners of the lady cairns versus the owners of the barque mona, in the court of appeal reservation of judgment in the case of harvey versus the ocean accident and guarantee corporation
一位上了歲數不再年輕的婦女正從大法院高等法院稅務法庭和高級民事法院共用的大廈里踱了出來。她剛在大法官主持的法庭里旁聽了波特頓神經錯亂案;在海事法庭上聆聽了「凱恩斯夫人號」船主們對「莫納號」三桅帆船船主們一案的申訴以及當事者一方的辯解;在上訴法庭,傾聽了法庭所做關于暫緩審判哈維與海洋事故保險公司一案的決定。The current public prosecution mode in our country took shape from the past whole case - examine mode in the base of the thinking to get ride of the drawbacks in the past. in practice, it has not only become effective and cause out a lot of new defaults, for example, the definition of the main evidence is not clear, the transfer range of the case files is unclear and the stipulate of the examine consequence is not enough. in order to reform and perfect the current public prosecution mode, we should regard the theory of the public prosecution as guide, combine our country ' s conditions, on methodology jump out of the circle relatively drawing lessons from the past, on the procedural theory, change the idea that the forejudge caused from the substantive examination and clarify the objective fact the current public prosecution include the essential substantive examination, in practice regard legitimacy, rationality and flexibility as the principle of law enforcement before the law to revise, in legislation define the concept of the main evidence clearly, add the regulation to dispatch the examine judge and the trial judge, regulate the treatment methods after examination and revise some rules about the summary procedure
以公訴審查制度的訴訟理念為指導,結合我國的國情,對現行公訴審查模式的改革和完善,在方法論上跳出以往比較借鑒的圈子;在訴訟理念上改變過去庭審法官預斷必然緣于實體性審查的觀念,以澄清現行公訴審查模式包括必要的實體審的客觀事實;在實踐中以合法性、合理性和靈活性作為立法修改前的執法原則;在立法上明確界定主要證據的范圍是對證明犯罪是否成立起主要作用或有重要影響的證據,其中既包括有罪證據也包括無罪證據,增加規定公訴審查法官與正式庭審法官分立制度,補充規定對公訴審查后開庭審理之外的其它情況的處理方法以及對於人民法院在審理過程中發現不宜適用簡易程序的,取消原刑訴法應當按照一般公訴案件適用的普通審判程序重新審理的規定,改為由審理該案件的獨任審判員以外的審判員重新組成合議庭對該案件進行重新審理等。It has three divisions : ( 1 ) the family division ; ( 2 ) the chancery division ; ( 3 ) the queen ' s bench division
主要包括民事案和一些刑事案,高等法院有三個分支: ( 1 )家事庭; ( 2 )娃哈哈官庭; ( 3 )王室庭。The intermediation conduct in courts in our country is a typical way of leading the nonlawsuits method in adr into lawsuits, that is, a judge performs some intermediation conduct between the two litigants as the intermediator
四、國內外相關制度的介紹、比較西方一些國家和地區像我國那樣完全與審判過程融為一體的法院調解很難找到,但由法官主持以促成當事人達成協議為目的的糾紛解決程序卻也常見。He also received his jurisprudence doctoral degree from indiana university. during the time of his law school, mr. whang participated in various internship programs sponsored by indiana attorney generals office and marion county civil and criminal courts. through such programs, he mastered legal research skills, and assisted judges and state attorneys in preparing legal documents, briefs, office memorandum, and motions
黃律師于著名的印地安那大學布魯明頓分校完成大學學業,並於該校的法學院取得法學博士的學位在法學院時黃律師即累積了豐富的經驗,入選參與印州總撿察長名下主辦的實習課程,並在州民事及刑事法院實習擔任法官助理累積了豐富的訴訟及辯論的經驗With reference to latest theoretical and practical results in judicial reform, the author puts forward following allegation : reconstructing court organization in china with the aim of judicial independence ; and legislative resetting the significance, function and organization, furthermore, the author contends that amendment and complement of actual constitutionm, court organization law, judge law and related criminal, civil and administrative law is necessary, only based on which can former contentions turn into reality
本文在參考我國司法改革的最新理論與實踐的成果基礎上,提出下述主張:以司法獨立為目標或基礎,重新建構我國法院組織機構;應當從立法上對基層法院的意義、作用及組織機構進行重新定位。作為實現上述主張的基礎條件,作者認為,必須對現行憲法和法院組織法、法官法以及刑事、民事、行政訴訟法等相關法律進行修改和完善。The reason why i research this subject is : contract law is the core of private law, . and in the view of judicial practice the contract - breaching obligations are the core of contract law, because the judicial actions is mainly about that one breached his contract duty and the other suit for damages or other remedies. in contrast, if both parties have performed their duties, there will no actions
之所以研究該課題的主要原因是:契約法是私法的中流砥柱,而就司法實踐而言,違約責任則是債法的核心問題,蓋法官所要解決的契約法糾紛主要是一方違約后的違約責任,蓋若雙方當事人均按照契約之內容履行了自己的義務,必然無須訴諸法院,凡是訴諸法院的契約糾紛勢必會涉及到一方沒有能夠全面履行其契約義務。The restraint mechanism inside the procuratorial organs mostly is carried out through the relation between the superior and the subordinate that incarnated by the principles of integration. the superior procuratorial organs or procurators through direct supervise and correct the subordinate ' s conduct, thereby reach the objective of restrain. the restraint mechanism outside the procuratorial organs mostly is carried out through the litigant, court, people ' s congress and social force
檢察機關內部的制約主要通過檢察一體原則所體現的上下級關系,由上級檢察機關、上級檢察官對下級檢察官的行為進行領導、監督、糾正,從而達到制約的目的;檢察機關外部的制約主要是通過當事人、法院、人大及社會的力量來對檢察機關行使檢察權的行為進行制約。After retrospecting the history of chinese judicial mediation system, analyzing the effect of today ' s judicial mediation, and combining the reform of judge ' s system taking professionalism and before - try preparing procedure. then drawing lessons from the relevant systems of other countries and regions, the economic reform goal according to chinese judicial tradition should be : in the frame system of the lawsuit, purifying the way of jurisdiction enforcement, giving judge and judge assistant judicial power and mediation power respectively in the mode that trying and mediation are separated, making jurisdiction and mediation properly separated in personal identity and stage. moreover, remedying the separation of jurisdiction and mediation functionally, complemented with reconciliation system in action
對我國法院調解制度加以歷史考察,對現行法院調解制度的效果進行分析,對民事訴訟功能及調解在司法實踐中偏差產生的根源加以探究,結合正在進行的以職業化為主線的法官制度及審前準備程序改革,再借鑒其他國家和地區的相關制度,符合我國司法傳統,比較經濟,既能遏止法院調解在實踐中產生消極作用,又能充分發揮調解功能的改革目標是:在訴訟框架體制內,純化法院審判權的行使方式,以調審分離為模式,將審判權、調解權分別賦予法官和法官助理,使得審判、調解在人員身份和階段上均適當予以分離,另輔之以訴訟中和解制度,對調審分離加以功能補救,同時建立對訴訟和解協議及民間調解協議的司法審核制度,以創建新型的法院調解制度。In order to ensure the positive role of intermediation, the scale of intermediation should be regulated and the dominating role of clients should be guaranteed. the judges " role should be objective, just and passive. the way of intermediation also needs to be regulated, for example, to increase the binding force of the intermediation agreement, to regulate non public intermediation and the negative results for the client refusing to accept intermediation
為此,建議從立法上確定法院調解的適用范圍,限製法院調解的不適當擴張;弱化職權主義色彩,強化當事人對訴訟的支配權,置法官于中立、公正和消極的地位;規范訴訟調解的方式;明確規定調解不公開;加強調解協議對當事人和法官的約束力;規定當事人承擔拒不調解而造成的法律後果。One can better grasp this situation by examining the ministry of educations organic law, which stipulates that the moe is the sole body responsible for the administration of educational affairs in the roc, and is the central administrative authority in directing and supervising the implementation of all educational affairs by local administrative authorities
此點可由教育部組織法的規定窺知,該法規定教育部主管全國教育行政事務,對于各地方最高級行政長官執行該部主管事務,有指示監督之責,對其命令或處分認為有違背法令或逾越權限時,得提經行政院會議議決后停止或撤銷之。Law courses are taught to cadets and officers in various military academies and schools, covering national laws, military regulations and rules, fundamental legal knowledge and international humanitarian law
軍隊各級各類院校都開設法律課程,對學員和軍官進行國家法律、軍事法規和法律常識以及國際人道主義法等內容的教育。The guarantee of this profession also loses its rationality. if the relationship between judges and other power organizations cannot be finely adjusted, the judge profession will not be guaranteed well, and the purpose of professionalization of judges will not be achieved. so, the fourth parts of this essay, after briefly introducing the contents of professionalization of judges, mainly addresses the judge choosing system and judge guarantee system
法官獲得如此多的信任和特權,都是以法官是經過嚴格遴選出的法律精英為前提的,如果選不對人,其他相關制度都無濟於事,職業保障也就失去了合理性;如果不能理順法官(法院)與其他各權力主體之間的關系,保障不力,法官職業化建設的目的就會落空。Mr. justice barry mortimer, judge of the hong kong court of final appeal ; mr. joseph yam, deputy chairman of the hkmc ; mrs. pamela chan, chief executive of the consumer council ; mr. kim salkeld, land registrar ; mr. anson kan, vice president of the law society of hong kong ; mr. ambrose ho, vice chairman of hong kong bar association and ms. susie cheung, general counsel and company secretary of the hkmc
主講者包括香港終審法院馬天敏法官按揭證券公司副主席任志剛先生消費者委員會總幹事陳黃穗女士土地注冊處處長蘇啟先生香港律師會副會長簡錦材先生香港大律師公會副主席何沛謙資深大律師及按揭證券公司首席法律顧問及公司秘書張秀芬律師。Take li hui juan incident as example, this part describes the shortage of the judge independence at present in our country and analyzes its reason from two perspectives of the shortage of constitutional order and the specific system. the impropriety of constitutional order is improper in the relationship of the power disposition among the jurisdiction and the leadership of chinese communist party, the supervisor of the national people ' s congress, the administrative right, the right of procuratorial work as well as the internal power disposition within the jurisdiction. in the analysis of the imperfection in specific system, this parts explains the systematic imperfection existing in such systems as the system of judge election and appointing, guarantee system, punish system
以洛陽中院李慧娟事件為例描敘了我國法官獨立缺失的現狀,從憲法制度不完善與具體制度不健全兩個方面分析了法官獨立缺失的原因。憲法制度方面主要剖析了審判權與黨的領導、人大監督權、行政權、檢察權之間以及法院內部權力關系的錯位。具體制度方面則分析了法官選任制度、保障制度、監督制度存在的制度性不健全。The value of pretrial procedure. pretrial procedure is the litigation activity in which parts of the cases will be solved before brought to court after the people ' s court accepts it, under the instruction and supervision of judges, in order to justly and efficiently get ready for a centralized trial at court through exchanging opinions and claims between clients, collecting and exchanging evidences, sifting and separating evidences to exclude some undisputable evidences, facts and requests, making clear of the facts, evidences and focus of dispute
審前程序是指人民法院受理民事案件后至開庭審理前,在法官的指導監督下,通過當事人相互交換各自的主張、請求,收集、交換證據,發揮過篩分流作用,使一部分案件于庭前獲得解決,對需要開庭審理的案件通過排除無爭議的證據、事實、主張,明確事實問題、證據問題和案件的爭議焦點即審理對象,為公正高效地集中庭審作好準備的訴訟活動。Keynote speakers will include the deputy director - general of personnel & training from the mainland, president of john jay college of criminal justice, city university of new york, chief commissioner from france, senior assistant commissioner of police from botswana police service, programme manager for the initial police learning and development programme, from the home office of the united kingdom, and assistant commissioner of police ( crime ) of the hong kong police force
屆時出席研討會的主題講者包括中國公安部人事訓練局副局長、美國紐約城市大學約翰傑伊刑事司法學院院長、法國高級警官培訓學院副主管、波札那警務處高級助理處長、英國內政部警務人員入職培訓發展課程主管,以及香港警務處助理處長(刑事) 。Keynote speakers include the deputy director - general of personnel & training from the mainland, president of john jay college of criminal justice, city university of new york, chief commissioner from france, senior assistant commissioner of police from botswana police service, programme manager for the initial police learning and development programme, from the home office of the united kingdom, and assistant commissioner of police ( crime ), hong kong police force
出席研討會的主題講者包括中國公安部人事訓練局副局長、美國紐約城市大學約翰傑伊刑事司法學院院長、法國高級警官培訓學院副主管、波札那警務處高級助理處長、英國內政部警務人員入職培訓發展課程主管,以及香港警務處助理處長(刑事) 。It mainly includes : consultations and negotiations that have been done for defendants in the problems of declaring guilty and reducing penalty between accusing party ( public procurator ) and defensive party. ( defendant, defense counsel ) before the court opens. when the defendant gives a certain satisfactory answers to the questions which the public procurators ask, according to the concrete conditions of the case. the public procurator will decide to reduce the quantity of charging, lower the quality of accusing guilty or put forward some suggestions for the court to reduce penalty
辯訴交易(或譯答辯交易)制度,是源自美國刑事訴訟審前程序中一項獨特的公訴制度,其主要內容為:控方(檢察官)同辯方(被告人或辯護律師)在法院開庭前對被告人的定罪和量刑問題進行協商、談判,被告人在滿足檢察官提出的一定條件(主要是認罪)后,檢察官根據案件具體情況作出減少指控數量,降低控罪性質,或者向法院提出減刑建議。The prizes were presented by guests of honour ms. shelley lee, jp, permanent secretary for home affairs, mr. yang ti - liang, gbm, jp, former chief justice and executive councillor and dr. cheung wing - ming, registrar of the hong kong institute of education
當日承蒙民政事務局常任秘書長李麗娟太平紳士,及前首席大法官及行政會議成員楊鐵梁太平紳士蒞臨擔任主禮嘉賓,而評審委員之一香港教育學院教務長張永明博士亦出席評論各得獎隊伍的表現。分享友人