生態分歧 的英文怎麼說
中文拼音 [shēngtàifēnqí]
生態分歧
英文
ecologic divergence- 生 : Ⅰ動詞1 （生育; 生殖） give birth to; bear 2 （出生） be born 3 （生長） grow 4 （生存; 活） live;...
- 態 : 名詞1. （形狀; 狀態） form; condition; appearance 2. [物理學] （物質結構的狀態或階段） state 3. [語言學] （一種語法范疇） voice
- 分 : 分Ⅰ名詞1. （成分） component 2. （職責和權利的限度） what is within one's duty or rights Ⅱ同 「份」Ⅲ動詞[書面語] （料想） judge
- 歧 : Ⅰ名詞（岔道; 大路分出的路） fork; branchⅡ形容詞（不相同; 不一致） divergent; different
- 生態 : organism s habits; modes of life and relation to their environment; ecology生態變異 ecocline; 生...
-
The second chapter of this dissertation retrospects the definitions and their differences, evolution of the term of " ecotourism ", the background of its birth, the differences between ecotourism and nature tourism, alternative tourism, sustainable tourism, community - based tourism and other terms. it comments on the criticisms of ecotourism as well
論文第二章「爭論與辨析：生態旅遊的認識」 ，全面、細致地梳理了生態旅遊的界定、定義的分歧和演變、生態旅遊提出的背景、生態旅遊與自然旅遊、可替代旅遊、可持續旅遊、社區旅遊等相關概念的關系以及針對生態旅遊提出的各種質疑和指責。Shifting the burden of proof of is the special provision and exception of the principle of burden of proof, during drafting " civil evidence code ", divergences about how to regulate the burden of proof appear, jurists have diffirent opinions on it, this paper set out from those divergences and disputes, discussing in detail with six sections : the disputes on the shifting the burden of proof, reasonable define the conception about shifting the burden of proof, the relation of shifting the burden of proof and deduction, shifting the burden of proof in present law and regulations, the function of shifting the burden of proof and the civil cases suitable for this regulation, legislative proposition. this artical elabrates the theoretical and realistic foundation of shifting the burden of proof. moreover, shifting the burden of proof is a phenomenon of proceeding and other regulations of solution to disputation, it is not confined to those laws and regulations of procedure, but also exist in substantial law
舉證責任倒置是舉證責任分配規則中的特殊與例外，在民事證據法的草擬過程中對舉證責任倒置的存廢與否產生了分歧，法學界對此的觀點也呈現出百花齊放的態勢，本文從舉證責任倒置爭議與分歧的觀點出發，基於舉證責任倒置存在與否的爭議、舉證責任倒置概念的合理界定、舉證責任倒置與推定的關系、舉證責任倒置在我國現行法律中的體現、舉證責任倒置的功能及可適用民事案件的具體類型、舉證責任倒置立法完善的構想共六個部分具體闡述，從理論角度、司法實踐及立法構想三個不同的視角分析舉證責任倒置在我國的存在的理論意義、現實意義與立法前景，表明舉證責任倒置不僅在我國具有立法基礎而且有實踐環境，闡述舉證責任倒置雖然是出現于訴訟或是解決爭議的其他程序中的一個現象，但它又不局限於訴訟及其他解決爭議的程序規范，從現有的法律規范及法律實踐來看，舉證責任倒置與實體法是「同呼吸，共命運」的，用句老話說就是「皮之不存，毛將焉附? 」The value theory on factor of production is a theory of value that protects the benefits of exploiters and it is different from scientific labor value theory, but its inherent error in logic lies not in admitting the function of objects in the creation of value but in confusing the function of objects with man ' s possession of objects, that is, confusing the function of objects and the function of exploiters
生產要素價值論是維護剝削者利益的價值理論，與科學的勞動價值論存在明顯的認識分歧，但其內在的邏輯錯誤並不在於承認物在創造價值中的作用，而在於混淆了物的作用與人對物的佔有作用，即混淆了勞動客體在勞動整體創造價值中的作用與剝削者作為變態的勞動主體對勞動客體的佔有作用。
分享友人