第一期官合 的英文怎麼說
中文拼音 [dìyīqīguāngě]
第一期官合
英文
healing by first intention-
In chapter 9 we summarize the whole paper, and explain the shortages of this paper and problems to further study. main conclusions of this paper are as follows : the first, state - owned funds have always been predominant in venture capital sources in china, and this caused the " government - operated model " which leads to excessive government ' s interferes and distorted venture capital contracts ; the second, limited partnership contract is better than incorporated company contract, because the former has obvious advantages in not only encouragement and controls, but also in investors " profits. however, this paper insists, incorporated company contracts will still be very popular in the near future because limited partnership still be illegal in most provinces of china ; the third, venture capitalists " share of profits in compensation clause of fundraising contracts is influenced by investors " attitude towards difficulties and obstacles of future investment
本文研究的主要結論：第一，在我國風險資本來源中，政府風險資本一直居於主導地位，這造就了我國風險投資的「官辦官營」模式，使其契約機制從一開始就帶有「行政干預」的烙印；第二，有限合夥契約在約束機制、激勵機制、投資者收益三個方面都明顯優于公司制契約，因此是我國風險融資契約的發展方向，但由於有限合夥在我國受到法律限制，公司制契約在一定時期內仍是我國風險融資契約的主要形式；第三，融資契約報酬條款中的激勵系數受主體先驗概率影響，借鑒有限合夥契約，可對我國公司制融資契約進行改造與重構；第四，與債權契約、普通股契約相比，可轉換優先股契約可以有效緩解風險投資過程中的信息不對稱、降低代理成本，因此是我國風險投資契約的最優選擇。In connection with this, it is relevant to note that in commenting on sph s allegation that the government has " rushed " into awarding the criii in february 2003, mr justice hartmann remarked that " the executive cannot always bow to the pressure of threatened litigation and it is always a question of policy whether an approved plan should be fulfilled without delay or whether delay is prudent " para. 91 of the judgment
在這方面，應注意的一點是，夏正民法官在評論保護海港協會指政府在2003年2月"倉猝"批出中區填海第三期工程合約時指出， "行政機關不能在每當有人以訴訟要脅時便作出讓步，至於應否如期按照核準圖落實工程計劃，還是暫緩施工較為謹慎，則始終屬于政策方面的考慮"判詞第91段。70 and 71 of the judgment. 6. in addressing the applicant s criticisms of the inadequacy of the engineering review published in november 2003, the judge considered that the evidence showed that a comprehensive report had been obtained and that the report had been commented upon by an independent expert who observed that the criii works were capable of meeting the high court s " three tests "
6 .關于申請人批評在2003年11月發出的工程檢討報告有欠妥善一事，法官認為，有證據顯示有關報告是一份全面的報告，而就該報告提供意見的獨立專家，亦認為中區填海第三期工程符合高等法院所訂的"三項測試" 。
分享友人