職權接受理論 的英文怎麼說

中文拼音 [zhíquánjiēshòulǐlún]
職權接受理論 英文
acceptance theory of authority
  • 職 : Ⅰ名詞1 （職務; 職責） duty; job; 盡職 do [fulfil] one s duty; 失職 neglect one s duty; derelictio...
  • 權 : Ⅰ名詞1 [書面語] （秤錘） counterpoise; weight （of a steelyard）2 （權力） power; authority 3 （...
  • 接 : Ⅰ動詞1 （靠近;接觸） come into contact with; come close to 2 （連接; 使連接） connect; join; put ...
  • 理 : Ⅰ名詞1 （物質組織的條紋） texture; grain （in wood skin etc ） 2 （道理;事理） reason; logic; tru...
  • 論 : 論名詞（記錄孔子及其門徒的言行的「論語」） the analects of confucius
  • 職權 : function and power; powers of office; authority of office
  • 接受 : accept; acceptance; reception; take; embrace
  • 理論 : theory
  1. Judges should make efforts to realize justice in law, taking procedural justice and substantial justice as same important, endeavoring to realize the doctrine of factuality, trying hard to realize the substantial justice through procedural justice. judges should have profound knowledge in the theory of laws, adept knowledge in law, common way of thinking of homogeneity, abundant social experience and deep humanistic consideration, and noble morality. judges should adjudicate case in neutral capacity, not being influenced by unfair influence, interference and controlling, and should intervene disputes there still exist lots of problems in the present situation of professional judges in accordance with the requirements of professionlization of judges

    職業化的法官，應有崇高的法律信仰，法律是法官的最高權威和唯一上司，法官只忠實於法律，服務於法律；應有共同的價值追求，把保護個體權利作為裁判遵循的首要價值，努力通過法律實現正義，把程序正義和實體正義作為同等重要的價值對待，並努力使法律真實接近客觀真實，力求通過程序正義實現實體正義；應具有豐富的法學理論知識，嫻熟的法律專業知識，同質化的共同思維形式，豐富的閱歷，深切的人文關懷和崇高的職業道德修養；法官應以中立裁判者的身份，具有真正的審理權和裁決權，而不受任何不正當的影響、干預或控制，不主動介入糾紛和爭議。
  2. Second the article discusses that the theoretical basis of these damages caused by the tort affecting the public utility facilities are the theory of dangerous liability and the theory of the public service. as the government increases the public utility facilities, it makes these damages suits becoming ordinary. in many countries governmental compensation act have include these damages suits

    文章的第二部分又論述了公有公共設施致害賠償的理論基礎是國家危險責任論和公共服務論，隨著近代政府職能增大，福利措施的增加，公共設施的設置日益普遍，雖然理論上很難將其歸屬公權力的作用，但公民接觸使用公有公共設施的情形日漸頻繁，因設施的瑕疵受損害的機率也日漸增多，目前各國的國家賠償責任，均已將公有公共設施的瑕疵損害原因包括在內。
分享友人
分享到 Line

分享到臉書