被告不在 的英文怎麼說

中文拼音 [bèigàobùzài]
被告不在 英文
abs re absens reo
  • 被 : Ⅰ名詞1 （被子） quilt 2 （姓氏） a surname Ⅱ動詞[書面語]1 （復蓋） cover; spread 2 （遭受） suffe...
  • 告 : 告動詞（由上至下告知） officially announce
  • 不 : 名詞[書面語] （剁物所用的木墩） a block of wood
  • 被告 : [法律] defendant; the accused被告席 dock; defendant's seat
  1. The accused man was able to prove an alibi.

    該被告能夠證明他當時不在現場。
  2. To the extent permitted by law, in no event shall ups, its affiliates, licensors, suppliers or any third parties mentioned at the web site be liable for any incidental, indirect, exemplary, punitive and or consequential damages, lost profits, and or damages resulting from lost data or business interruption resulting from the use of and or inability to use the web site, the ups systems, information, services or the content whether based on warranty, contract, tort, delict, or any other legal foundation, and whether or not ups is advised of the possibility of such damages

    在法律允許的范圍內，在任何情況下，對因使用或未能使用本網站ups系統服務內容或資訊而產生的任何偶然的間接的典型的懲罰性的或因果性的損害利潤損失或因資料丟失或商業中斷導致的損害， ups及其附屬公司許可人供應商或在本網站提及的任何第三方，不向您承擔責任，無論該損害是基於保證合同侵權行為不法行為或其他法律理論而提出的，即使ups事先被告知該損害的可能性也不承擔責任。
  3. To the extent permitted by law, in no event shall ups, its affiliates, licensors, suppliers or any third parties mentioned at the web site be liable for any incidental, indirect, exemplary, punitive andor consequential damages, lost profits, andor damages resulting from lost data or business interruption resulting from the use of andor inability to use the web site, the ups systems, information, services or the content whether based on warranty, contract, tort, delict, or any other legal foundation, and whether or not ups is advised of the possibility of such damages

    在法律允許的范圍內，在任何情況下，對因使用或未能使用本網站、 ups系統、服務、內容或信息而產生的任何偶然的、間接的、典型的、懲罰性的或因果性的損害、利潤損失或因資料丟失或商業中斷導致的損害， ups及其附屬公司、許可人、供貨商或在本網站提及的任何第三方，不向您承擔責任，無論該損害是基於保證、合同、侵權行為、不法行為或其它法律理論而提出的，即使ups事先被告知該損害的可能性也不承擔責任。
  4. To the extent permitted by law, in no event shall ups, or its affiliates, principals, suppliers or any third parties mentioned at my ups be liable for any incidental, indirect, exemplary, punitive andor consequential damages, lost profits, andor damages resulting from lost data or business interruption resulting from the use of or inability to use my ups, the ups systems, services, content or information, whether based on warranty, contract, tort, delict, or any other legal foundation, and whether or not ups is advised of the possibility of such damages

    在法律允許的范圍內，在任何情況下，對因使用或未能使用「我的ups 」 、 ups系統、服務、內容或信息而產生的任何偶然的、間接的、典型的、懲罰性的或因果性的損害、利潤損失或因資料丟失或商業中斷導致的損害， ups及其附屬公司、許可人、供貨商或在「我的ups 」提及的任何第三方，不向您承擔責任，無論該損害是基於保證、合同、侵權行為、不法行為或其他法律理論而提出的，即使ups事先被告知該損害的可能性也不承擔責任。
  5. If the judge could n ' t exclude the possibility of existence of reasonably adverse fact, in another words, he could n ' t come to the state of good faith, he will pronounce the defendant " not guilty ". in order to find facts of cases and restrict judges " subjectivity and abuse of power, doctrine of discretional evaluation of evidence has inherent and systematic restrictions : the base of judgment is evidences in adversary proceeding ; judges should conform to logic and experiences ; judges must come to the state of " good faith "

    「排除合理懷疑」要求充分排除合理的反對事實存在的可能性，並本著誠實的判斷認為犯罪事實存在，才達到被告人有罪的內心確信，從而作出有罪事實的認定；如果法官不能充分排除合理的反對事實存在的可能性，或者不能依靠內心真誠的判斷來排除合理的疑問，就是未達到有罪的內心確信，應當作出被告人無罪的判決。
  6. The third part of this article mainly discusses the causal relationship in market manipulation, which is a block of the enforcement of the law against market fraudulences. because market manipulation is a kind of special tort, the author agree on the use of the " proof to the contrary " theory to lighten the proof burden of the damaged party in causal relationship. besides, this part also discusses such issues as how to decide the scope of legal plaintiffs, how to assess the losses of the damaged party

    本文第三部分「操縱市場的因果關系研究」從民法一般的因果關系理論入手，並結合操縱市場的侵權行為中因果關系的特殊性，論述了操縱市場的侵權行為中因果關系是否成立的判斷標準，並主張對因果關系在民事訴訟中舉證責任的分配應突破「法律要件分類說」的要求，適用因果關系舉證責任倒置的做法，即由操縱市場案件中的被告負擔證明責任成立因果關系不成立的舉證責任，否則即推定因果關系成立。
  7. Work hard to find for our students, no longer a stranger to the topic, the hard money, we may have been in kindergarten when was informed that the plight of the community into the campus and encourage students to become teachers to study hard and power tools, whether it is good or bad

    工作難找，對於我們學生來說早已不是什麼陌生的話題了，掙錢的辛苦，我們或許在幼兒園的時候就已被告知，社會的困苦湧入校園並成為教師激勵學生刻苦學習動力的工具，這究竟是好還是壞？
  8. Is the one you happen to come upon in the defendant jailhouse

    和你在被告牢房裡不小心看到的是同一本嗎
  9. In such case the defendant may, irrespective of the actual fault or privity of the owner, avail himself of the limits of liability prescribed in article v, paragraph 1

    在上述情況下，不管船舶所有人存在實際過失或暗中參與，被告人均可援用第五條第1款所規定的責任限定。
  10. The accused, by virtue of having used it in their catalog, have imposed a particular awkward and odious pattern format on the software community, which has proven to be something of a procrustean bed

    被告，通過採用在他們的類別中使用，對軟體社團強加了一個難用和令人不爽的模式格式，被證實是普羅克汝斯忒斯之床。
  11. In the dock before the international military tribunal they looked different.

    現在在國際軍事法庭的被告席上，他們的樣子不同了。
  12. No reasonable man ought to doubt the unstained innocence of your relation at the bar.

    凡是知理明義的人再不會懷疑你那站在被告欄里的親戚的清白無辜了。
  13. The charge alleges that between june and july 2004, the defendants had allegedly pre - allotted the cooked food stalls at the new market prior to the auction, and agreed not to compete against one another in bidding the stalls at the auction. as a result, fehd was allegedly deceived into believing that there was only one bid offered at the upset price for each of the cooked food stalls and renting the stalls at the upset prices to the defendants or their representatives

    控罪指被告於二四年六月至七月期間，涉嫌在舉行競投之前互相預先分配位於新街市的熟食檔位，並互相協議不會在競投中彼此競逐上述熟食檔位，導致食環署相信上述每個熟食檔位只有一個以底價開出的叫價，因而把上述熟食檔位以底價租給被告或其代表。
  14. In sentencing, the judge pointed out that even though the three defendants had not confessed, the weight of evidence from many witnesses and documents had convicted the first defendant, who had not avoided the obvious conflict - of - interest in his relationship with a shareholder of the company

    法官在判刑時指出，縱使三名被告不認罪，但眾多證人的供詞以及大量的文件證物，好比如山鐵證，足以令第一被告罪名成立。第一被告明知自己與該公司股東的關系，卻沒有設法迴避當中明顯存在的利益沖突。
  15. They were ordered to reside at the reported addresses, and not to interfere with prosecution witnesses

    法庭命令被告須在報住的地址居住，並不得騷擾控方證人。
  16. The defendant employed and paid salary to the two employees from april 2000 to december 31, 2002. however, the defendant failed to give advance notice of one month to the cir regarding the employees departure from hong kong as required under section 52 ( 6 ) of the inland revenue ordinance ( iro ). also, the defendant failed to withhold payment of money to the two employees, as required under section 52 ( 7 ) of the iro

    被告howerobinsonandcompanylimited在二年四月至二二年十二月三十一日期間僱用及支付薪金予兩名雇員，但卻未有遵照《稅務條例》第52條第（ 6 ）款規定，預先於一個月前將該兩名雇員離開香港一事通知稅務局局長;及沒有按照第52條第（ 7 ）款的規定於發出通知日起計一個月內不得支付任何金錢予該兩名雇員。
  17. In view of the undesirable consequences of a defendant being not legally represented in a trial involving a serious criminal offence, council considered that legal aid could be granted by lad in the first instance to a defendant charged with a serious criminal offence if he applied and accepted legal aid, although he might be unable to pay the required contribution at the time of acceptance

    鑒于在涉及嚴重罪行的審訊中被告人無法律代表所引致的不良後果，本局認為，倘被控嚴重罪行的被告人申請並接受法律援助，法援署可先行提供法律援助，雖然被告人在接受援助時可能無力繳付規定的分擔費用。
  18. I say it and i say it emphatically without wishing for one moment to defeat the ends of justice, accused was not accessory before the act and prosecutrix has not been tampered with

    我絕不想損害司法的目的，然而這一點我必須反復強調指出：被告不是事先參與預謀的從犯，而起訴人被玩弄的事實也不存在。
  19. The children were told to avoid speaking to strangers in the street

    孩子們被告知在大街上不要同陌生人講話。
  20. In sentencing, the judge pointed out that although the accused chose not to confess his deeds, the court had allowed suspended terms of imprisonment, taking into account good conduct records, remorse, the return of the money to the victim who eventually suffered no loss, and the accused s dismissal from public service

    法官在判刑時指出，雖然被告不肯坦白交代自己所做過的事情，但法庭考慮到他行為良好，並且已生悔意，有關款項已經交還受害人，受害人最終並無任何損失，而且被告亦已被撤職，故準予緩刑。
分享友人
分享到 Line

分享到臉書