defence in lawsuit 中文意思是什麼
defence in lawsuit
解釋
訴訟答辯-
Continent law department have the value of collateral appeal system and this kind of system, generally in civil lawsuit system lies in mainly to protect the appellee who appeal expect have been full, gives up appeal right or appeal had been rejected, lets him use the appeal program that the appellor has lodged, by the collateral appeal to change or discard the sentence of trial so to realizes both parties equal in attack and defence
大陸法系民事訴訟制度中，普遍存在著附帶上訴制度，這種制度的價值主要在於保護上訴期已滿、舍棄上訴權或上訴被駁回的被上訴人的利益，讓其利用上訴人的上訴程序，依附帶上訴的方式請求變更或廢棄一審判決，從而實現當事人雙方的攻防平等。 -
The aim of this article is to develop some effective studying on this point through the analysis of internal value of the displaying system of criminal evidence, and describes the active functions of it both on justice and efficiency as well as protection of the defence right of accused party. furthermore, the article compared different displaying systems of criminal evidence of the usa, great britain, japan, and italy to discuss the development rules of this system combing with the chinese present mixing litigation mode of original authority lawsuit method and the oppositional court inquiring method by both parties, which comparing and analyzing the rules of evidence - displaying both of original and present modes to list the problems existed in the present criminal evidence - displaying system. finally, the article brings forward some conceives of configuration and perfecting of chinese criminal evidence - displaying system from the selection of mode, scope, and judge function of criminal evidence - displaying and penalty measures to the deregulation of displaying of evidence etc
首先從分析刑事證據展示制度的內在價值入手，充分闡述其在實現公正與效率兼顧和保護被告人辯護權方面的積極作用；其次通過對美國、英國、日本和義大利的刑事證據展示制度的比較，來探析該制度的發展規律；再次結合我國的刑事訴訟從原來的職權主義訴訟模式轉變為現在兼有當事人主義有關規定的混合式訴訟模式，對前後兩種模式中具有證據展示性質的規定進行比較分析，說明現在刑事證據展示方面存在的諸多問題；最後從刑事證據展示的模式選擇、刑事證據展示的范圍、法官在證據展示中的作用、以及違反證據展示規則的制裁措施等幾個主要方面，對構建和完善我國的刑事證據展示制度提出了設想。
分享友人