infringement of trademark 中文意思是什麼
infringement of trademark
解釋
侵犯商標權- infringement : 冒用商標
- of : OF ＝Old French 古法語。
- trademark : （商標）：用以明確一個企業及其產品的名稱、術語或符號。
-
Domain names cannot infringe the exclusive right of trademark. otherwise the infringer shall bear legal liabilities of sloping infringement, compensating for losses, excluding coincidence, non - business use, use with reason and that the domain name has used firstly
域名不得侵犯馳名商標和注冊商標的專用權，否則應當承擔停止侵權、賠償損失等法律責任，但與商標權巧合雷同、非商業性使用、合理使用、域名在先注冊等情形除外。 -
To provide consulting service to chinese and foreign clients concerning copyright, trademark right, patent right and proprietary technology and concerning problems in acquiring, exercising and transferring these rights ; to draft transfer contracts and related documents ; to act as an agent for filing patent applications, for the registration of trademarks and the copyright of computer asftware ; and to act as an agent for clients in handling legal proceedings arising from obtaining or revoking patent rights, infringement of various rights and technology transfer
向中外客戶就著作權、商標權、專利權、專有技術及因為上述權利的取得、行使、轉讓中的各類問題提供咨詢，起草轉讓合同及有關文件，代理進行專利申請，代辦商標注冊及計算器軟體版權登記，代理客戶因專利取得與撤銷、各種權利被侵犯以及技術轉讓糾紛引起的訴訟活動。 -
Any activity to use the above trademarks and trade names without prior authorization will constitute infringement of trademark right and intellectual property right of fuji xerox and its relevant companies
未經富士施樂或其關聯公司的允許，使用上述商標商號用於經營目的將會侵犯富士施樂或其關聯公司的商標權或其它知識產權。 -
Any item which whether by itself or which contains any design, mechanisms or mark, constitutes an infringement of the copyright, patent, trademark or other proprietary rights whether intellectual or otherwise of another party
所有物品無論本身或其包含的任何設計機械結構標志構成侵犯他人版權專利權注冊商標或擁有權無論是否屬于知識范圍。 -
Each particular brand of social benefits ( that is the trademark in a certain time, can produce all receipts ) is limited, a person obtains the benefits more ( that is, the personal income trademarks greater ), others can obtain small, whether " jan had borrowed his " or " he will have damage " are infringement of trademarks function, which makes the function can not play normal
商標具有稀缺性，每一個特定的商標的社會收益（即該商標在一定時空中所能產生的全部收益）是有限的，一個人從中獲取的收益（即該商標的個人收益越大） ，其他人能夠獲取的收益就越小，是一種此消彼漲的關系。無論是「借他揚己」還是「損他利己」都是對商標功能的損害，使得商標的功能無法正常發揮出來。 -
Interim provisions for strengthening cooperation in cracking down on crimes of trademark infringement
最高人民法院關于建立馳名商標司法認定備案制度的通知 -
Reconsideration to the perfection of civil compensation responsibility system of trademark infringement in china
對我國商標侵權民事賠償責任機制完善的再思考 -
First, reveals the expressions of the infringement of trademark right, and has a deep discussion on the distinguish features as well as perniciousness of all kinds of infringements, especially how to have a correct understand and application of the relating provisions of our state ' s laws
文章首先揭示了侵犯商標權行為的表現，對各種侵權行為的特點、危害性，特別是如何正確理解和適用我國法的相關規定作了深入探討。 -
Then it asserts that the objective standard of trademark infringement may include : illegal activities, damages and causality between illegal activities and damages, by drawing lessons from international treaties and foreign laws, then basing on the rules of " imminent infringement " of the new trademark law, and combining it with the characteristics of intellectual property rights at the same time. while whether the subjective standard needs fault needs to be contingent upon different forms of trademark infringement
接著通過借鑒國際條約、國外法律，並依據新《商標法》上關于「即發侵權」的規定，同時結合知識產權領域侵權的特點，主張在認定商標侵權行為時，客觀方面需要具備違法行為、損害以及違法行為和損害之間的因果關系三個要件；主觀方面是否需要具備過錯，則需要依不同的商標侵權行為形式而定。 -
In addition, this chapter introduces some practice in developed country, such as u. s. and singapore. secondly, i introduce the dynamic of anti - dilution protection. trademark protection has its roots in the common law. prior to 1996 the cornerstone of trademark infringement is the likelihood of confusion
因此本文以美國為例，在對馳名商標反淡化保護問題的理論基礎、歷史發展、立法現狀等幾個相關問題進行探究的基礎上，對美國馳名商標反淡化保護問題作了全面的分析。 -
First, the author will introduce the well - known trademark rights infringement dispute in which “ the maple leaf sued the crocodile ”. it caused the legal scientific and practical fields ’ attention to the emergence of trademark reverse passing off in china. second, the author will define the profound term of trademark reverse passing off in simple language, namely : “ trademark reverse passing off ” refers to the illegal act of changing or removing others ’ registered trademarks without permission and putting in others ’ commodities to the market
這種行為不僅影響了商標的本質功能，引起商品流通秩序的混亂，違反了對注冊商標專用權保護的法律艦定，侵犯了商標權人的合法權益，而且妨礙了原商品生產者擴大其商標知名度和提高產品市場份額，違背公平競爭、誠實信用的商業道德和法律原則。 -
Infringement of trademark
冒用商標 -
David llewelyn : one of the areas of infringement of trademark which is often very controversial is the area of spare parts accessories
王遷:那另外一個非常有爭議的有關商標侵權的領域就是有關配件的東西。 -
In chapter 4, i analyze the use, obtainment and infringement of trademark on the net. because of the worldwide internet, the characteristics of the trademark, such as regionalism, timeliness and exclusiveness, are challenged
在網路上獲得商標權有兩種方式：一是在網路上第一個或唯一的商標使用：二是商標首先在現實世界中使用，以後才在網路中使用。 -
With the purpose to make the provisions of chinese existing laws, which are the main clue of this thesis, apply better and the remedial mechanism of trademark right more perfect, the thesis discusses the subject of the infringement of trademark right
本文以我國現行法律規定為主線，運用實證分析的方法，論述了商標權的侵犯及救濟問題，力求使現行法律規定更好的得以適用，商標權的救濟機制進一步完善。 -
Second, discusses the imputation of the liability of trademark right, and points out : it is practicable to establish the system of " right of the real claim " or " right of intellectual property claim ", with succeeding and perfecting the system of liability for tort at the same time ; the compensation for damage of infringement of trademark right should take the principle liability for fault as the main liability principle and the principle liability for fault inferred as a complement. third, discusses the excuses which may be as a plea in the action of the infringement of trademark right, such as fair use, prior right, forfeiter of trademark right. at last, approach the subject that how to apply and perfect legal proceedings and alter ways to the remedies of trademark right
接著，探討了侵犯商標權責任的認定，指出：可在繼承與完善我國侵權民事責任制度的同時設立物上請求權或知識產權上請求權制度來保護商標權；侵犯商標權的損害賠償宜採用過錯責任為主、過錯推定責任為輔的歸責原則；隨后，探討了侵犯商標權訴訟中可以作為抗辯的事由，如合理使用、在先權、商標權無效等；最後，探討了運用和完善訴訟和訴訟外兩種方式救濟商標權的問題。 -
However, the protection to the trademark, which includes the appropriately use of the trademark, the principle of exhaustions and the right formerly use, is “ restrictively ”, rather than “ absolutely ”. section two material composition and category of trademark infringement the identification of the trademark infringement is the precondition of its protection. there are four aspects compose the trademark infringement, namely, the irregularity of the party concerned, the injured effect, the causation between the irregularity and the injured effect, and the subjective fault of the
當然，商標權的保護並不是絕對的，其限制主要體現在基於合理使用制度、權利用盡原則和在先使用權等三個方面;文章接著分析和探討了商標侵權行為在主觀上、客觀上、損害後果、損害後果與違法行為之間的因果關系等方面的構成要件，將各種商標侵權行為按其具體內容進行類型化分析;最後，重點闡述了商標權保護系統化的重要意義及商標權保護系統中的民法保護、刑法保護和行政法保護，以期對商標權保護有一個較為全面認識。 -
The third section is the essence of trademark infringement
第三節是商標侵權的實質。 -
Concretely speaking, the doctrine of no - fault liability apply to use infringement, selling infringement, commodity name or mounting infringement, innuendo trademark infringement and well - known trademark infringement, but the doctrine of liability for wrongs apply to the identification of trademark infringement, assisting infringement and domain name infringement
具體的說就是：使用侵權行為、銷售侵權行為、商品名稱或裝潢侵權行為、影射商標侵權行為和馳名商標侵權行為適用無過錯責任原則；而商標標識侵權行為、輔助侵權行為及域名侵權行為適用過錯責任原則。 -
Because use infringement, selling infringement, commodity name or mounting infringement, innuendo trademark infringement and well - known trademark infringement already occupy the majority of trademark infringement, the author holds that the liability principle applied to trademark infringement mainly is the doctrine of no - fault liability, secondly is the doctrine of liability for wrongs
因為商標使用侵權行為、銷售侵權行為、商品名稱或裝潢侵權行為、影射商標侵權行為和馳名商標侵權行為這五種形式已經占據了商標侵權行為總數的絕大部分，因此，本文認為：商標侵權行為主要適用無過錯責任原則，其次是過錯責任原則。
分享友人