rights in rem 中文意思是什麼
rights in rem
解釋
物權-
On the other hand, it weakens the distinction between " right of things " and " obligation ", " right of things " are no longer the typical rights in rem, contractual rights are no longer the typical rights in personam
最後認為:價值化一方面使物權和債權統一起來，另一方面使債權和物權都在不同的程度上與其傳統的形象和特質背離，逐漸消解二者之間的嚴格的界限。 -
This article contains three parts, namely, preface, body and conclusion. the preface mainly introduces the discussing subject and writing purposes of this article. body is divided into four parts : from the beginning of actio in rem and actio in personam in roman law, the first part detailedly inspects and analyses the formation process of the dual rights system in historical research methods ; the second part discusses the theoretical framework of the dual rights structure from the aspect of system ; the third part mainly analyses the middle rights and the integration of real rights and creditor ’ s rights and the reasons for the emergence of these phenomena, pointing out that the emergence of these phenomena is unevitable in civil law system which ajusts social relationship with systematic code, and how
正文分為四個部分:第一部分採用歷史研究的方法，從羅馬法上的對人之訴和對物之訴出發，對物債二分體系的形成過程進行了細致的考察和分析;第二部分從體系化的角度討論了物債二分體系的理論構成，對其理論架構進行了總體上的研究;第三部分著重分析了物權與債權的融合和中間狀態及其出現這些現象的原因，指出在運用體系化的方法調整社會關系的過程中，出現物權和債權中間狀態的權利形態是不可避免的現象，並對如何正確看待這些問題進行了論證;第四部分在前文論述的基礎上，對我國一些學者提出的制定財產法和設立財產法總則的觀點的可行性進行了分析，指出無論是從我國大陸法系的傳統還是從技術層面來看，制定財產法或設立財產法總則都是不可行的。 -
The first class of objects are physical things, they are objects of in rem property rights ( esp. " rights of things " in german law )
第一種是實體意義上的物，它是狹義的財產權、特別是德國法意義上物權的客體。 -
In the field of rights in rem, equity at the lower level is not contradictory with efficiency
摘要在物權領域，淺層面的物權公平與物權效率並不矛盾。 -
At this cross - section, it is impossible to iron out the " matthew effect " induced by the potential energy of " monopoly in rights in rem "
並且在這一交叉層面的「物權壟斷」勢能所產生的「馬太效應」不可能熨平。 -
Making mortgage as a core, basing on the jurisprudence of public jus in rem, considering related social policy, depending on circumstances of china ' s present legal system, in contact with related foreign legislations, the paper makes an analysis on the order among multiple mortgages, between mortgage and the other priority rights as they coexist
本文以抵押權為軸心，以物權公示法理和基於社會政策的考慮為線索，依託我國現行法制背景，結合國外相關立法，分析了抵押權與抵押權並存時、抵押權與其他擔保物權並存時、以及抵押權與相關優先權並存時的順位關系。
分享友人