剩餘相關表 的英文怎麼說

中文拼音 [shèngxiāngguānbiǎo]
剩餘相關表 英文
residual correlation table
  • : Ⅰ動詞(剩餘) be left over; remain Ⅱ形容詞(剩餘的) surplus; remnant
  • : Ⅰ同「余」Ⅰ-Ⅳ1. Ⅱ名詞(姓氏) a surname
  • : 相Ⅰ名詞1 (相貌; 外貌) looks; appearance 2 (坐、立等的姿態) bearing; posture 3 [物理學] (相位...
  • : Ⅰ動詞1 (使開著的物體合攏) close; shut 2 (圈起來) shut in; lock up 3 (倒閉; 歇業) close down...
  • : Ⅰ名詞1 (外面;外表) outside; surface; external 2 (中表親戚) the relationship between the child...
  • 剩餘 : overplus
  • 相關 : be interrelated; be related to; be bound up with; correlation; dependence; relevance; mutuality
  1. In this article, we will compare different banking institutions, study an extensive literature on relationship lending, then explain the theory in the frame of neo - institutional economics systematically and with modeling demonstration. after specifying the costs, benefits and net - profit transfers, we will analyze the banks and firms " characteristics and surrounding factors subject to the participation and incentive constrains, finally draw our conclusion that : lending behaviors between banks and firms are diverse and always affected by the two parts " bargaining power, social environment or their cognition to the relation. we comment that smes and banks develop relationship lending which is prone to satisfy the participation and incentive constrains, and that relationship lending should be a feasible way of smes " financing

    本文將通過對各國銀企系制度進行比較,就系貸款命題對文獻進行廣泛調研,在新制度經濟學的分析框架下進行系統規范的理論闡述和模型證明,列舉系貸款的預期收益、成本內容,對凈的租金轉移進行分析,在此基礎上研究使系貸款滿足參與約束與激勵容約束的銀行和企業特徵、制度環境因素,得出結論:各國市場環境下,銀行與企業之間的系型融資有不同的現形式,信貸行為受到銀企雙方談判地位、主觀認識的影響以及社會信用、經濟條件、制度背景等客觀環境的制約;中小企業和中小銀行之間的系貸款安排易於滿足合約雙方的參與約束和激勵容約束,不失為中小企業融資的一條可行途徑。
  2. This paper examines the effect on accounting information ’ s value - relevance of different sectors which belong to different competitiveness position by association study, in order to supply evidence about how to choice the performance appraisal index for the firm

    研究結果明:會計收益的價值性最高,不同行業對現金流量和收益現出一定的差異。但不可否認的是,現金流量和收益具有增量信息含量。
  3. In addition, the theoretical analysis of chapter 2 indicates that the fundamental bifurcation of the two theories focuses on the distribution of residual rights of the firm, which is a short for claim to residual and residual rights of control. the mainstream theory deems that residual rights of the firm should be centralized on asset owners symmetrically, but the stakeholder theory insists that it should be distributed symmetrically among asset owners and human recourse owners unbalanced

    第二章的理論分析還明主流企業理論與利益者理論的根本分歧在於:前者認為企業權(索取權和控制權)應集中對稱分佈於物質資本所有者,而後者認為企業權應非均衡地分散對稱分佈於企業的物質資本和人力資本所有者之中。
分享友人