定罪量刑 的英文怎麼說
中文拼音 [dìngzuìliángxíng]
定罪量刑
英文
punishment fits the crime- 定 : Ⅰ形容詞1 (平靜; 穩定) calm; stable 2 (已經確定的; 不改變的) fixed; settled; established Ⅱ動詞...
- 罪 : Ⅰ名詞1 (犯法的行為) crime; guilt 2 (過失) fault; misconduct; blame; wrongdoing 3 (苦難; 痛苦...
- 量 : 量動1. (度量) measure 2. (估量) estimate; size up
- 定罪 : declare sb. guilty; convict sb. (of a crime)
- 量刑 : [法律] measurement of penalty; 光量刑 light quantum量刑標準 criterion for imposing penalty; crite...
-
The codefendant will probably benefits from the cooperation in the aspect of conviction or sentence
作為相互合作的回報,同案被告在作證之徒可能在定罪或量刑方面獲得相應的利益。According to the principle of " the synthetic distribution of punishment ", the author poses the concept of " the circumstance of distribution of punishment ", and taking the error making method, compares the " robbery of housebreaking " with there circumstances : the criminate, the sentencing, and the distribution of punishment, it is conclude that the " robbery of housebreaking " should not be regarded as the circumstances of crime or the sentencing discretion, even though there are some barriers in the theory conclusions as a circumstance of distribution of punishment, so we can conclude that the " robbery of housebreaking " can not be considered as the legal circumstances, it must be the circumstance of distribution of punishment even if it is regarded as the legal circumstances. in the process of jurist and legislation, we must strictly grasp the approval standards of the " house ", recognize and deploy the legal sentence of " robbery of housebreaking " correctly,
根據「統一配刑論」的原理,筆者提出了「配刑情節」的概念,並採取歸謬法,將「入戶搶劫」同時置於定罪、量刑、配刑三種語境下進行比較,得出「入戶搶劫」既不應該是犯罪情節,也不可能是量刑情節,作為配刑情節也存在理論障礙的結論,進一步推斷出「入戶搶劫」不應該作為法定情節,即使作為法定情節也應該是配刑情節的結論,而且在司法和立法中應從嚴把握「戶」的認定標準,正確認識和配置「入戶搶劫」的法定刑,防止罪刑失衡,還對具體案件和審判實踐中要解決的幾個問題提供了參考方案。Under special relationships of lapping of legal provisions, the rule that special law is superior to common law shall be strictly followed. only under special circumstances shall the harsher or less harsh provision apply ; as to subsidy relationships, primary law shall be applied rather than additional law ; as to absorption relationships, the law as a whole is superior to a part of the law. the author does n ' t support the principle that the harsher law is superior to the less harsh law
針對特別關系的法條競合的適用應該嚴格依照特別法優于普通法的原則,例外的情況是當一個行為觸犯同一法律時,在特殊情況下可以選擇較重或較輕的法條定罪量刑,以防止量刑的畸輕或畸重;針對補助法條關系的法條競合,其適用應遵循基本法優于補充法的原則;吸收關系的法條競合的處理,其適用原則是整體法優于部分法。In continental law system countries, burden of proof includes burden of adducing evidence, burden of persuasion. burden of adducing evidence means that the subjects in criminal procedure who initiate trial procedure and require the courts to judge according to their demands or subject whom there is presumption against must adduce adequate " evidence of the fact to prove that the evidence is on the demand of proof. otherwise the subjects will fail in the suit
筆者認為,刑事訴訟證明責任,是指在刑事訴訟中引起審判程序啟動並要求法院依其主張裁判或存在對其不利之法律推定的刑事訴訟主體,必須就其主張的對定罪量刑具有決定作用的待證特定事實或者為推翻不利的推定事實提出足夠證據,並利用證據對該事實或或者為推翻不利的推定事實加以證明到法律規定的程度。Third, two necessary conditions of constitutive elements of crime. namely, the whole constitutive elements of crime include crime objective respect, crime subjective respect. the second view and third view in common is that object of crime ' s essential and independent status is wiped off in the structure construction of constitutive elements of crime
第二、三種觀點的相同之處是在犯罪構成整體的結構搭建中抹去了犯罪客體的應有獨立位置,而認為犯罪客體是現行犯罪構成體系中多此一舉的要件,它的存在對定罪量刑也無多大意義。In the judicial practices, the cases of forcibly seizing especially seizing by means of utilizing the motor vehicles are increasing daily, and thus many controversial questions about their conviction and punishment arise, so the study on crime of seizing has great theoretical value and realistic meaning
在司法實踐中,搶奪案件特別是飛車搶奪案件日益增多,在定性量刑上出現了一些爭議較大的新問題,所以對搶奪罪進行研究具有一定的現實意義和理論價值。The article discusses in details several important points of crime of robbery and puts forward to theoretical directions in convicting and punishing or sentencing
本文針對搶劫罪定罪量刑的幾個重點問題,詳盡論述,從而為準確認定搶劫罪和正確量刑提供理論指導。One " cause public property to suffer significant loss " it is derelict blame a of impersonal aspect main feature, it is to conviction the important basis of measurement of penalty
一「致使公共財產遭受重大損失」是玩忽職守罪客觀方面的一個重要特徵,是定罪量刑的重要依據。Studing on the form of quantity of crime is to distinct types of one crime and types of plural crimes, to illustrate the constituting elements and essential nature of various forms of quantity of crime, to determine the principles to deal with different forms of quantity of quantity of crime, and to correctly decide crime and measure punishment
結果加重犯是刑法罪數理論的一個重要概念,研究罪數形態的目的是為了區分一罪與數罪,闡明各種罪數形態的構成要件和本質屬性,從而確定對于不同罪數形態的處理原則,正確定罪量刑。According to that, it has important role and theory value for guilty control and guilty precaution. this thesis stands in the point of the puzzled question of death caused by escape in theory and practice, and analyses some important questions of it, in order to help determining and dealing with this kind of cases rightly in judicial practice
但究竟如何界定因逃逸致人死亡的法律內涵、罪過形式、表現形式,如何區分其與不作為故意殺人罪的界限,以及針對各種情況如何定罪量刑,成為正確理解與適用這一規定的關鍵問題。But the explanation is limited, so the subjective elements of crime are not status. the conception of status in chinese penal code is that the legal and special individual factor. the statuses in the penal code have the character of law, responsibility personality and durative compare to other status
復數之行為人如果均具有構成要件所規定的特殊資格或條件,而參與身份犯之教唆、幫助或共同實施的,不論該犯罪為純正身份犯或不純正身份犯,參與者均可以構成身份犯之廣義共犯,對其定罪量刑沒有疑義。The third : the classification of identity. according to different standards. there are many different kinds for it
第三,身份的本質特徵,即身份必須而且能夠影響行為人的刑事責任進而影響定罪量刑。Only by this, we can operate the entity law efficiently and achieve the purpose of punishing and fighting against computer crime
這樣才有利於實體法的實行,進而有利於對計算機犯罪正確的定罪量刑,達到懲治和防範計算機犯罪的雙重目的。Generally, different theories have different scope of liability, and ultimately affect the conviction and sentencing of the perpetrator, so, how
一般說來,不同之學說所歸結的責任范圍均有所不同,因而最終會影響到對行為人的定罪量刑。The first section explains the mistake about expected possibility. the second section is about the relationship between expected possibility and determine guilt and weigh the penalty
第一節探討了期待可能性的錯誤問題,第二節是關于期待可能性與定罪量刑的問題。When persons with special capacity enforce certain capacity crime by oneself or persons with the same capacity enforce certain capacity crime together, conviction and punishment can apply directly provisions of criminal law
單獨犯狀態的身份犯的定罪量刑依照刑法與有關司法解釋的規定即可,但身份犯一旦與共同犯罪問題相聯系,其問題就變得棘手。But the constitutive elements of the crime partly regulate that only special person can commit the crime, these kinds of crime are status of crime. so the status of crime is one kind of require special title in the penal code
身份犯之共犯是刑法理論中的熱點和難點問題,它所要解決的是復數行為人參與實現身份犯罪時,如何對各參與人定罪量刑的問題。There are theoretical and practical difficulties in existing case supervision system for people ' s congress and supervisory pattern of procuratorial power. they not only have not taken effect well but also have impacted on judicial independence
如果在刑事司法中,法官該為而不為,或者不該為而為,都應當有有效的機制進行約束;而對裁判權的監督是對法官定罪量刑適當性的監督。The author ’ s study on status theory makes a comparatively systematic research on the issues as following : concept, characteristics, evolution, essence on the base of definition, features, categories and particular meaning of status crime
其本質特徵和主要作用就是對犯罪主體的定罪和量刑有所影響。身份犯之身份具有特定的內涵,僅指犯罪主體所具有的對定罪量刑有影響的個人要素。But, the actors who haven ’ t the illegal objective of possession in the early days of the loan, after they obtain the loan by the false ways, changed their objective and produced the objective of the illegal possession during the process of performing the contract of the loan, and handle the loan illegally by the ways of transferring, concealing, etc. this kind of behavior should be regarded as the crime of the fraudulent loan, too
同時,由於本罪沒有規定單位犯罪主體,而單位騙貸又是貸款詐騙的常態行為,因此就如何對單位騙貸行為進行定罪量刑,本文也進行了深入的探討。在本文的最後,對貸款詐騙罪與一般的貸款欺詐行為,借貸糾紛,以及相似罪名進行了界分。分享友人