實質上的損害 的英文怎麼說

中文拼音 [shízhíshàngdesǔnhài]
實質上的損害 英文
essential quality of damages
  • 實 : Ⅰ形容詞1 （內部完全填滿 沒有空隙） solid 2 （真實; 實在） true; real; honest Ⅱ名詞1 （實際; 事實...
  • 質 : Ⅰ名詞1 （性質; 本質） nature; character; essence 2 （質量） quality 3 （物質） matter; substance;...
  • 上 : 上名詞[語言學] （指上聲） falling-rising tone
  • 的 : 4次方是 The fourth power of 2 is direction
  • 損 : Ⅰ動詞1 （減少） decrease; lose 2 （損害） harm; damage 3 [方言] （用尖刻的話挖苦人） speak sarcas...
  • 實質 : substance; essence; texture; parenchyma; quiddity; parenchima
  • 損害 : harm; damage; injure; damnify; [生物學] lesion; blight
  1. Collect or store personally identifying information about other users for unlawful purposes. you acknowledge and agree that sinobal and its designees shall have the right ( but not the obligation ), in their sole discretion, to refuse to publish, remove, or block access to any content that is available via the products and services at any time, for any reason, or for no reason at all, with or without notice

    倘若您與一名或一名以上用戶，或與您通過本公司網站獲取其服務的第三者服務供應商發生爭議，您免除（及本公司代理人和雇員）在因該等爭議而引起的，或在任何方面與該等爭議有關的不同種類和性質的任何（實際和後果性的）權利主張、要求和損害賠償等方面的責任。
  2. Unauthorized partition of state property “ in the name of the unit ” is materially with the name of unit to seek the personal gains, to injure the goods for own benefits. moreover, the crime of unauthorized partition of state property as the crime with intent, its subjective aspect is not actually directly seeking the benefits for the unit, but the member of the unit seeks individual personal gains. the crime of unauthorized partition of state property as the crime of making profits, the state - unit is not beneficial actually, on the contrary, the benefits that the state - owned unit has or controls are invaded by the member of the unit, and the unit has become the direct victim of the crime of unauthorized partition of state property

    因為， 「集體決定」私分國有資產體現的僅是單位成員的共同意志，而不是單位的整體意志; 「以單位名義」私分國有資產實質上是假借單位名義牟取私利、損公肥私;而且，私分國有資產罪作為直接故意犯罪，其主觀方面卻不是為單位謀取利益，而是單位成員藉此謀取個人私利;私分國有資產罪作為獲利型犯罪，國有單位卻不是受益人，相反，屬于國有單位所有或者支配的國有資產被單位成員侵佔、瓜分，單位成了私分國有資產罪的直接受害人。
  3. But there are still many problems hi practice that m & a on financial statement which can only bring short - term effect are more than m & a on value which can really improve the company ' s competity. in order to solve these problems, many new strict regulations have been worked out since 2001 which result in the stepwise standardization of m & a. the content of the thesis is composed of three parts : part one : the basic theory of m & a

    真正有價值的實質性重組很少，戰略重組更難企及，市場上盛行的大多是注重短期效應的報表重組，重組后企業並不能隨之真正提高贏利能力，而利用重組圈錢牟利、操縱股價的案例時有發生，這無疑會損害我國證券市場的健康發展，針對這些問題，從2001年開始，管理層加大了監管力度，資產重組逐步走向規范。
  4. Finally, the author expresses her idea of whether restitution petition right is one kind of petition rights on property both in theory and in instances, pointing out petition rights on property both in theory and in instances, pointing out that restitution petition right shall be the same in nature as damages petition right instead of one kind real petition rights

    最後，筆者還對恢復原狀請求權是否為物上請求權的一種，不僅從理論上而且還從實務上以案例分析的方式闡明自己的觀點，指出恢復原狀請求權應與損害賠償請求權為相同性質，不可能成為物權請求權的一種。
  5. Because individual stockholders must ration shares, while big stockholders always give up rationing shares, the rights and interests of the former will be occupied by the later. big stockholders will hurt small stockholders by ra tioning shares through using inferior - quality and high - price assets

    在配股過程中，由於社會公眾股股東往往必須配股，而國有股、法人股股東常常放棄配股，導致前者權益被后兩者侵佔；大股東用劣質高價的實物資產配股，損害中小股東權益；上市公司重配股、輕使用，無法實現股東權益。
  6. But for a variety of reasons, the peasants " material interests are frequently damaged, whose protection and realization assume a fluctuating phenomenon in the process of the spiral ascending, that is, totally they develop increasingly, but they are sometimes good and sometimes bad in the different historic periods, so the protection of the peasants " material interests has been in a unstable situation all along

    但是，由於種種原因，農民物質利益也時常受到損害，其保護和實現在螺旋式上升的進程中呈現出一種波動現象，即在總體上雖日益發展，但不同的歷史時期仍表現為時好時壞，農民物質利益的保護一直處于不穩定狀態。
  7. For a long time, the action mode of authority creed has been adopted in civil procedure, while the legislation and the theoretical circles do n ' t pay enough attention to the principle of good faith. compared to western countries, the existing system of civil procedure cannot effectively protect the right of action of the parties. although we do not have the tradition of the rule of law, our culture of

    訴訟法既保障當事人實質意義上的公正，也強調當事人人格尊嚴不受侵犯，實質公正和程序公正並重，因此，訴訟法上的歸責不以行為人給他人造成實際損害為要件，只要行為人實施了違反誠信義務的行為，且主觀上存在過錯，即應承擔違反誠信原則的法律後果。
  8. On the substance hand, i hold : subrogation rights of debtor is a kind of conditional and statutory content of creditor " s right ; it needs subjective and objective condition, for example, the first debtor ' s should be due, etc ; the result of exercising the subrogation is that the second debtor clears the debt to the first debtor not the creditor

    在實體法方面，筆者認為：債權人代位權實質上是一種附一定條件的法定的債權權能，其構成應滿足一定的要件，其中包括主債務人能行使而不行使到期債權，債權人遭受了遲延履行的實際損害，其代位債權必須是非專屬于主債務人的既存的合法的財產性權利等，債權人代位權的行使結果是次債務人向主債務人清償債務，債權人不能獨占該財產以充抵自己的債權。
  9. Directors of dltp includes de jure directors, de facto directors and shadow directors and third parties is composed of shareholders, creditors and some special creditors, such as governmental tr. x agencies, social security departments and corporate employees. the legal nature of dltp is special liability and different from liabilities mder tort, accordingly directors have to face both the liabilities under civil law and the special liabilities under corporate law. a director is not liable to third parties except that his or her action is illegal ; he or she is guilty of wrongful intent or of gross negligence for the illegal action ; the action occurs in the course of performing his or her corporate suties ; and third parties are damaged by the action

    作者指出，董事對第三人責任中的董事不僅指正式董事，而且還包括影子董事和事實董事;除了股東和一般債權人之外，第三人還包括二些特殊債權人，如稅務機關、社保機關以及雇員等;其責任性質為法定責任，但並不排除與民法侵權責任競合的可能;董事對第三人責任應包括以下要件: .董事之行為須違法、董事對其行為違法有故意或重大過失、董事之行為發生於執行職務過程中、第三人因董事之違法行為受損害;在舉證責任的分擔上應有董事證明其違法行為是否有故意或重大過失，實現這一制度的訴訟形式為第三人之訴;另外，在公司破產時應採取一些特殊措施，以保證公平受償。
  10. Restorative criminal responsibility needs and can obtain the reasonable annotation in elementary theory issues of criminal law, such as the law profit, crime essence, criminal activity legal relationship and legal responsibility : ( 1 ) the crime of violating the individual law profit is not the violation that aims at the abstract national or social entity, but aims at the individuals ; ( 2 ) " inspiring the authority " is not the basic task of the modern civil rights criminal law, maintaining victim ' s rights and interests and safeguarding that of criminal ’ s are “ two sides of the whole body ” of modern criminal law functions, neglecting any side at the same time inevitably enable the criminal judicature not to sink into region of the righteousness ; ( 3 ) in the concrete criminal activity legal relationship, the crime victim is the natural subject, the related country judicial organ is the subject of investigating the crime responsibility, or that of the judgment or execution, country in the overall significance cannot become the subject ; ( 4 ) repair and compensation of the crime harm is by no means a matter of civil liability, but is the basic entity burden of the legal responsibility which the criminal must shoulder

    恢復性刑事責任需要且能夠在法益與犯罪本質、刑事法律關系及刑事責任等刑法基本理論問題上得到合理詮釋: （ 1 ）侵害個人法益犯罪並不是針對抽象的國家或社會實體的侵害，而是針對私人的侵害; （ 2 ） 「重振權力」不是現代民權刑法的基本任務，保障與維護受害人和犯罪人合法權益是現代刑事法功能之一體兩面，忽視任何一面勢必使刑事司法陷於不義之境地; （ 3 ）在具體刑事法律關系中，犯罪受害人是當然主體，有關國家司法機關是犯罪責任之追訴或裁判或執行主體，整體意義上的國家並不能成為主體; （ 4 ）犯罪損害的修復與賠償並非民事責任的事情，而是犯罪人應當擔負的刑事責任之基本的實體性負擔。
  11. As a kind of illegal phenomenon, the insider trading endangers the long - term, healthy, steady development of security market. at present, the countries and regions all over the world have been forbidding the inside trade and taking all sorts of measui ~. with the setting - up and perfection of the security market ofour country, the inside trade violation and criminal offence have already be ~ me a phenomenon that can ’ t be ignored, question about the inside trading activity discussion of carrying on the legal structure becomes the law circles ’ focus progressively. at present, our country issue a senes of laws and regulations successively already, legislate, administration judicial authority take the corresponding mcasul " c to the inside trading activity separately. however, there are lacks of regulations about the civil liabilities of insider trading. obviously, the civil liability for tort is valid methods to protect the interests of vast interests. under this kind of background, thc strengthening of legal research about the inside trade ’ structure of security market of our country has been great, realistic meanings. this thesis is composed offour parts, in which the third and fourth parts arc the core

    然而，這並不意味著我們已經找到有效規制證券市場上內幕交易的方法，我國證券市場上內幕交易民事救濟制度的缺位已是理論界和實踐界公認的事實。借鑒其他國家和地區的立法經驗，本文在論證內幕交易法律監管的正當性基礎上，指出證券市場內幕交易的民事責任制度具有不可或缺的性質。通過對證券市場內幕交易結構進行分析，嘗試明確我國內幕交易民事責任的性質及構成要件，並且著重針對內幕交易的民事責任救濟機制的訴訟主體資格、訴訟模式及損害賠償數額研究等三個方面加以論述，以期對我國內幕交易民事責任制度研究、建立和完善有所裨益。
  12. Accordingly, the author holds that divorce compensation is a tortious liability. its function contains three aspects of comforting a mental scar, making up for a loss and preventing illegal act

    離婚損害賠償從性質上講是一種侵權責任，其構成要件適用侵權責任的構成要件，即違法行為、損害事實、因果關系和主觀過錯；其功能包括精神慰撫、填補損害和制裁、預防違法行為三個方面。
  13. Are legal conflict between legal essential justice and formal justice an issue that could not be avoided ? is it worthy existing for the rule of lawwhen it does harm to essential legal justice as well as befits people ? should the rule of law follow essential justice or formal justice that may lead to the " true " rule of law ? in order to explore those problems, the thesis aims to make research on legal essential just ice and formal justice, and advocates that legal formal should justice prevails

    法的形式正義與實質正義的沖突是法不可迴避的問題嗎；法治在帶給人們利益的同時如何損害著實質的正義，這種損害是否有存在的價值；究竟是形式正義的法還是實質正義的法才是法治之下的法，基於以上原因，本文將探討法的形式正義與實質正義的問題，且立論於法的形式正義應該優先於法的實質正義。
  14. That is why there is uniform legal system as " tort of interference " to solve the problem on the third party infringes the creditor ' s right and we should use it for reference. the writer considers that the behavior of infringing the creditor ' s right is the third party, who knows the situation of debt relation and wants to infringe it, induces the debtor to breach the contract or block the creditor from exercising his right

    經過比較研究，在第三人侵害債權的構成問題上，筆者認為侵害債權行為是由第三人在明知債權存在並意欲侵害債權的主觀心態驅使下而為的引誘違約或阻礙債權實現的侵權行為，可為第三人所侵害的債權包括合法成立的債權和預期合同關系及商業利益，當侵害債權的行為造成對債權的實質損害時，侵權人應當獨立地直接對債權人承擔侵權責任。
分享友人
分享到 Line

分享到臉書