法定量刑情節 的英文怎麼說
中文拼音 [fǎdìngliángxíngqíngjié]
法定量刑情節
英文
legally prescribed circumstances of sentencing- 法 : Ⅰ名詞1 (由國家制定或認可的行為規則的總稱) law 2 (方法; 方式) way; method; mode; means 3 (標...
- 定 : Ⅰ形容詞1 (平靜; 穩定) calm; stable 2 (已經確定的; 不改變的) fixed; settled; established Ⅱ動詞...
- 量 : 量動1. (度量) measure 2. (估量) estimate; size up
- 情 : 名詞1 (感情) feeling; affection; sentiment 2 (情分; 情面) favour; kindness; sensibilities; fe...
- 節 : 節構詞成分。
- 法定 : legal; statutory法定安培 legal ampere; 法定貶值 official devaluation; 法定標準 statutory standard...
- 量刑 : [法律] measurement of penalty; 光量刑 light quantum量刑標準 criterion for imposing penalty; crite...
-
According to the principle of " the synthetic distribution of punishment ", the author poses the concept of " the circumstance of distribution of punishment ", and taking the error making method, compares the " robbery of housebreaking " with there circumstances : the criminate, the sentencing, and the distribution of punishment, it is conclude that the " robbery of housebreaking " should not be regarded as the circumstances of crime or the sentencing discretion, even though there are some barriers in the theory conclusions as a circumstance of distribution of punishment, so we can conclude that the " robbery of housebreaking " can not be considered as the legal circumstances, it must be the circumstance of distribution of punishment even if it is regarded as the legal circumstances. in the process of jurist and legislation, we must strictly grasp the approval standards of the " house ", recognize and deploy the legal sentence of " robbery of housebreaking " correctly,
根據「統一配刑論」的原理,筆者提出了「配刑情節」的概念,並採取歸謬法,將「入戶搶劫」同時置於定罪、量刑、配刑三種語境下進行比較,得出「入戶搶劫」既不應該是犯罪情節,也不可能是量刑情節,作為配刑情節也存在理論障礙的結論,進一步推斷出「入戶搶劫」不應該作為法定情節,即使作為法定情節也應該是配刑情節的結論,而且在司法和立法中應從嚴把握「戶」的認定標準,正確認識和配置「入戶搶劫」的法定刑,防止罪刑失衡,還對具體案件和審判實踐中要解決的幾個問題提供了參考方案。The criminal law of p. r. c stipulated that the legal circumstances includes the circumstances of crime and the sentencing discretion, whether as the circumstances of crime or sentencing discretion, there are some barriers in the theory and practice of the " robbery of housebreaking ", because the criminal law of our country has no specific rules about the aggravate crime or the aggravate circumstance
我國刑法規定的法定情節包括犯罪情節和量刑情節兩種, 「入戶搶劫」作為犯罪情節或者量刑情節都存在理論和實踐上的障礙,因為我國刑法並無加重構成罪或者加重量刑情節的具體規定。In part ii, the eight circumstances in article 263 of criminal law are illustrated. in the author ' s view, these eight circumstances are just sentencing circumstances for sentence between 10 years imprisonment and death penalty. they are not punishment enhancement elements
在第二部分,筆者對刑法第263條規定的8種情節進行了闡述,認為刑法第263條規定的8種情形只是在10年至死刑之間選擇量刑的量刑情節,而非所謂的加重處罰情節,這8種情形本身不存在既遂、未遂問題,只有構成與否的問題。An inquiry to circumstances of penalty measurement and legal penalty
淺探量刑情節與法定刑The following steps may be effective : take into account all the details related to a crime including the circumstances for discretion without regard to the concrete legal circumstances presumably ; decide abstractly the standard of punishment which should be applied to the crime ; examine the legal circumstances and adjust the said criterion
刑法規定的法定量刑情節需要一個參照基準,應在假定不考慮犯罪人的具體法定量刑情節的基礎上,考慮犯罪人所有的與犯罪有關的全部犯罪細節包括酌定情節,抽象地確定這一犯罪應當適用的基準刑罰,再在此基礎上,考慮量刑的法定情節,對基準刑罰進行適當的調整。The prosecutor ' s proposing power in the judge ' s discretion in sentencing ( " proposing power " ) means the public prosecutor on behalf of the people ' s procuratorate based upon the facts and circumstance of the crime that the dependant commits, nature of the crime and the degree of endangering society, makes suggestion to the people ' s court regarding the criminal penalty that may be imposed on the dependant, the term of penalty, pecuniary fine and whether the probation shall be applicable ate. as a system innovation that basic people ' s procuratorate has made in the judicial practice, there are some question needed to be clarified in theory in the system of public prosecutor ' s proposing in the judge ' s discretion in sentencing
量刑建議權是指公訴人在出庭支持公訴過程中,根據被告人的犯罪事實、犯罪情節、性質和社會危害程度代表人民檢察院建議人民法院對被告人處以某一特定的刑罰、刑期、罰金以及是否應緩期執行等方面提出具體意見的權力。作為一種基層人民檢察機關在司法實踐中的制度創新,量刑建議制度在理論上存在著一些需要澄清的問題,本文在綜合各方觀點的基礎上,擬對量刑建議制度系統闡述。Compared with the legally - prescribed circumstances of sentencing, the discretionary circumstances of sentencing also is a indispensable significant factor for sentencing
酌定量刑情節相對應於法定量刑情節,同樣是一種不可或缺的、在量刑時起重要作用的量刑因素。Take legislation pattern, it analyses the legislations of different countries, and probes the flaws of current system in our country. explore from concrete chosen pattern, singular crime and company crime amount aspects, compare with legislation models, we should decide the amount according to the criminals circumstances and economic condition. chapter five has a comprehensive discussion of fine penalty implement
就罰金刑數額立法模式,首先考察了各國的立法例,分析了我國現有的罰金刑數額立法模式的局限,針對罰金刑數額立法模式的具體選擇從對自然人犯罪的罰金數額立法模式、單位犯罪罰金數額以及對罰金刑並罰時的數額規定三個方面進行了分析;就罰金刑數額裁量原則,從罰金刑裁量原則立法例比較,認為判處罰金刑,應當根據犯罪情節和犯罪人經濟狀況綜合決定罰金刑數額。This paper analyzes the convicted circumstances and given circumstances of kidnapping in the current criminal law and proposes detailed and perfect recommendations
摘要本文對現行刑法綁架罪定罪情節與量刑情節進行了論證分析,並提出了具體的、完善的建議。Article 27 if the falsifying or remaking of the certificates or documents, seals or stamps, marks, sealings or quality certification marks for commodity inspection constitutes a crime, the criminal responsibility of the personnel directly responsible shall be investigated by applying mutatis mutandis the provisions of article 167 of the criminal law ; if the circumstances are minor, the offender shall be fined by the commodity inspection authorities
第二十七條偽造、變造商檢單證、印章、標志、封識、質量認證標志,構成犯罪的,對直接責任人員比照刑法第一百六十七條的規定追究刑事責任;情節輕微的,由商檢機構處以罰款。For legislation, there should be a fundamental, general rule about the principle of the ci, which is abs - cent in our criminal code. but the principle has been implemented in the specific clauses ; to realize the ci in sentence, the sentence circumstances should be coped with correctly, the system of personality investigation should be applied, and the relation should be coordinated between the principle of the sentence individualization and the principle of suiting punishment to crime ; criminal execution individualization is generally realized through execution readjustment and individual treatment
在立法上,應當對刑罰個別化作一原則性、一般性規定,而我國刑法則缺少這樣的規定,但在具體條文中卻貫徹了這一原則;在量刑上要實現刑罰個別化,須正確處理量刑情節,適用人格調查制度,並且要協調好量刑個別化與罪刑相適應的關系;行刑個別化一般通過行刑調控和個別處遇得以實現。To operate the discretionary circumstances of sentencing precisely, we should hold the following three principles : abide by statutory buctrine, pro defendente doctrine, principle of reasonable ambiguity
要準確運用好酌定量刑情節,必須把握好以下三項原則:遵循法定原則、有利被告原則以及合理模糊原則。The article states on the above mentioned three principles, then on this base, it brings out several suggestions on how to operate the discretionary circumstances of sentencing, in order to provide some references to the practice of our legislation and justice
文章對上述三原則進行了一定程度的闡述,在上述理論的基礎上,最後對如何具體運用好酌定量刑情節提出了幾點建議,以期對我國的立法和司法實踐提供一定的參考。分享友人