法律的詮釋 的英文怎麼說
中文拼音 [fǎlǜdequánshì]
法律的詮釋
英文
interpretation of law- 法 : Ⅰ名詞1 (由國家制定或認可的行為規則的總稱) law 2 (方法; 方式) way; method; mode; means 3 (標...
- 律 : Ⅰ名1 (法律; 規則) law; rule; statute; regulation 2 (律詩的簡稱) short for lüshi 3 (姓氏) a ...
- 的 : 4次方是 The fourth power of 2 is direction
- 詮 : [書面語]Ⅰ動詞(詮釋) comment; explainⅡ名詞(事理) reason; true meaning
- 釋 : Ⅰ動詞1 (解釋) explain; elucidate 2 (消除) clear up; dispel 3 (放開; 放下) let go; be reliev...
- 法律 : law; statute法律保護 legal protection; 法律程序 legal procedure; 法律承認 de jure recognition (...
- 詮釋 : annotation; explanatory notes
-
Subsequently by taking “ ancient - style poems ” as center, make an exploration into the acceptant condition of traditional poems collection to canons in the preceding dynasties at the time of “ canon ” being established, from a comprehensive view by editor ' s selection basis, arrangement of collection and readers ' acceptability : among which the “ ancient poems collection ” to the superficial succession and meaning transfer of tu ' s poems canon as well as to the polemic interpretation and conclusion of five - character and seven - character poems canon, and the acceptability and misreading of “ poems of transcription in modern style ” in the mid of ching dynasty to “ ancient poems collection ”, all of which are sufficient to verify the alternative of “ canon ” for traditional poems collection that most of them adopt measures of succeeding canon in early times first, then making an increase and reduction ; while the selection of canon takes “ direct variation of polemics ” as premise, followed by a consideration of degree of art values ; it can be the concrete index of trend to make comments on poems on the selection and interpretation of canon for masters of each school
其後,再由綜觀編者評選基準、選集編排、讀者接受等多重角度,以王士禎《古詩選》為中心來探究常規詩選集在創建典律時,對前代典律的接受狀況:其中由《古詩選》對杜詩典律的表面繼承與意義轉移、對五古、七古詩典律的辨體詮釋與總結,以及清中葉《今體詩鈔》等選集對《古詩選》的接受與誤讀…等,皆足以驗證常規詩選集的典律交替,大多採取先繼承前代、再漸進轉換新典律的作法;且其典律的選立每先以辨體之正變為前提,再考量藝術價值的高低;而於各體名家典律的選擇與詮釋上,則通常可作為其論詩趨向的具體指針。An analysis of multiformity in interpretation of law
試析詮釋法律的多樣性Rule 16 must be read subject to rule 13 in that for persons charged convicted with the offence of murder, treason or piracy with violence, the judge might grant legal appeal aid certificate to them and exempt them from the means test and or payment of contribution
第16條須在第13條的規限下詮釋,據此,對于被控被定罪有關謀殺叛國或使用暴力的海盜行為的人士,法官可向其提供法律上訴援助證明書及豁免彼等免受經濟審查及或分擔費用。The theory on interest function main expands conflict, balance, guarantee and relief, which are related to interests. it pays more attention to the resource for legal adjustment, idealized standard, system, and basic rule of interest in the end, it expounds rights restriction that are needed to interests functions. the key of rights restriction is to build beneficial mutual relation between civil society and state, only in this way will it provide systemic mechanism of guarantee to solve and balance contradictions and conflicts of interests
利益運行論主要詮釋利益的沖突與利益衡量,利益保障與利益救濟,對利益的法律調整緣由、應然基準、機制和基本原則進行比較詳細而具體的論析,最後論及了利益運行中必要的權力限制?其關鍵是必須建構市民社會和國家的雙向互動的良性關系,才能為解決和協調利益矛盾與利益沖突提供製度性保障機制。Governing law and jurisdiction 14. 1 all rules regarding the citybus website members corner, including the members rules shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of hong kong
管轄法律及司法管轄區13 . 1城巴網頁會員天地的所有規則(包括會員規則)必須受香港法例管轄並按其詮釋。The linguistic tool and its effect for legal interpretation
詮釋法律的語言工具及其效力Distinguishing from formal reasoning, dialectical reasoning is a reasoning which can get definite knowledge in the discussion of problems ( topia ) by rebuttal, distinction and induction, when the legal or factual premise is absent, or the premise is controversial. in short, dialectical reasoning is an instrument to seek propositions and conclusions from possibility. in dialectical reasoning, judges often use their own judgments to find a legal or factual precondition
傳統的形式主義推理觀的機械性和局限性受到越來越多的批判,而現代法律推理學說更加關注非演繹的辯證推理在法律推理過程中的重要作用,哲學詮釋學的興起和實踐理性的復歸,也使辯證推理在各國的法律實踐中普遍運用起來,然而其明顯的價值判斷傾向使推理過程看起來過于主觀。It begins with a systematic exposition of the developing process of philosophical hermeneutics and the viewpoint of the representative scholars, then it presents the changes occurred in legal hermeneutics. in the light of the viewpoint that there is no law with only one correct explanation, and explanation has the characteristics of subjective and creative, the author attempts to introduce the theory of communicative action of habermas
本章首先系統梳理了哲學詮釋學的發展過程,介紹了各代表學者的主要觀點,然後介紹了在哲學詮釋學影響下法律解釋學發生的變化。本章還討論了法律詮釋學與法律解釋學的關系,認為二者互相不可替代。本章重點介紹了哈貝馬斯的溝通行動理論,提出應當在法律解釋研究中引入哈氏的溝通行動理論。Restorative criminal responsibility needs and can obtain the reasonable annotation in elementary theory issues of criminal law, such as the law profit, crime essence, criminal activity legal relationship and legal responsibility : ( 1 ) the crime of violating the individual law profit is not the violation that aims at the abstract national or social entity, but aims at the individuals ; ( 2 ) " inspiring the authority " is not the basic task of the modern civil rights criminal law, maintaining victim ' s rights and interests and safeguarding that of criminal ’ s are “ two sides of the whole body ” of modern criminal law functions, neglecting any side at the same time inevitably enable the criminal judicature not to sink into region of the righteousness ; ( 3 ) in the concrete criminal activity legal relationship, the crime victim is the natural subject, the related country judicial organ is the subject of investigating the crime responsibility, or that of the judgment or execution, country in the overall significance cannot become the subject ; ( 4 ) repair and compensation of the crime harm is by no means a matter of civil liability, but is the basic entity burden of the legal responsibility which the criminal must shoulder
恢復性刑事責任需要且能夠在法益與犯罪本質、刑事法律關系及刑事責任等刑法基本理論問題上得到合理詮釋: ( 1 )侵害個人法益犯罪並不是針對抽象的國家或社會實體的侵害,而是針對私人的侵害; ( 2 ) 「重振權力」不是現代民權刑法的基本任務,保障與維護受害人和犯罪人合法權益是現代刑事法功能之一體兩面,忽視任何一面勢必使刑事司法陷於不義之境地; ( 3 )在具體刑事法律關系中,犯罪受害人是當然主體,有關國家司法機關是犯罪責任之追訴或裁判或執行主體,整體意義上的國家並不能成為主體; ( 4 )犯罪損害的修復與賠償並非民事責任的事情,而是犯罪人應當擔負的刑事責任之基本的實體性負擔。How the magistrate reason is related to a litigation case can correctly handle, can - party service income defendants and the national legal system can be correct implementation
摘要裁判理由的詮釋是一個涉及到訴訟案件能否正確處理,當事人能否服判息訟以及國家整個法律制度能否得到正確實施的問題。La s view on the interpretation of section 6 of the exchange fund ordinance cap. 66
法律顧問就外匯基金條例第66章的詮釋提出的意見This paper ' s reasons for the " horizon ", the use of philosophical hermeneutics analysis of the formation of the basic rules and processes
本文以裁判理由為「視域」 ,運用哲學詮釋學的方法分析了其形成的基本規律和過程。The fact that the lawyer has a direct personal interest in the outcome of the case may lead to undesirable practices including the construction of evidence, the improper coaching of witnesses, the use of professionally partisan expert witnesses, especially medical witnesses, improper examination and cross - examination, groundless legal arguments designed to lead the courts into error, and competitive touting
事實上,如律師對案件的結果具有直接個人利益,可引致不良行為,包括證據詮釋不當引導證人任用專業上有所偏袒的專家證人尤其是醫學證人不當訊問及盤問專為引領法庭犯錯而設的毫無根據的法律論點及競相招徠。This article first looks back the relation between logistics and reverse logistics, then detailed figures out the severally sides of reverse logistics and afresh explains its happen reason, characteristics, types and handling means. close behind preceding context, i discuse the terms of acquiring the customer loyalty and the different profitable advantages and disadvantages inside of the supply chain associates, also points out the compelling limits of laws
本文首先回顧了逆向物流與物流的關系,然後詳細的對逆向物流的各個方面進行了解讀,重新詮釋了逆向物流的產生原因、特點、分類和處置方式;緊接著,論文又從企業通過逆向物流獲得顧客的角度、供應鏈夥伴的角度對逆向物流進行了探討,同時也闡述了法律、法規對逆向物流的強制性要求。Therefore, the two theories on the interpretation of the law, one stressing the content, the other emphasizing the method, are both indispensable
主張強調內容與注重方法的兩種法律解釋觀互不可替代,解釋無詮釋流於空洞,詮釋無解釋走向盲目。Interprets relevant laws and regulations on dangerous chemicals transport
詮釋危險化學品運輸相關的法律法規分享友人