申請在先原則 的英文怎麼說

中文拼音 [shēnqǐngzàixiānyuánzé]
申請在先原則 英文
first-to-file principle
  • 申 : Ⅰ動詞（說明; 陳述） state; express; explain Ⅱ名詞1 （地支的第九位） the ninth of the twelve earth...
  • 請 : 動詞1. （請求） request; ask 2. （邀請; 聘請） invite; engage 3. （招待; 款待） entertain 4. [敬] （用於希望對方做某事） please
  • 先 : 名詞1 （時間或次序在前的） earlier; before; first; in advance 2 （祖先; 上代） elder generation; ...
  • 原 : Ⅰ形容詞1 （最初的; 原來的） primary; original; former 2 （沒有加工的） unprocessed; raw Ⅱ動詞（原...
  • 則 : Ⅰ名詞1 （規范） standard; norm; criterion 2 （規則） regulation; rule; law 3 （姓氏） a surname Ⅱ...
  • 申請 : apply for; ask for
  1. Securing judgment procedure is to protect the legal rights of creditor, under that aim, there also exist two direct aim, one is safeguard the execute of the judicial addict made in the future, the other is to avoid the unredemptive damages chapter 3 the type of civil securing judgment procedure this chapter researches into the type of civil securing judgment procedure and relevant legal basis in main countries, including the arrest and einstweligeverfugung in germany and japan, the juger en refere iprocedure and qrdanance sur requite in france, attachment, temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction in u. s, pre - judgement rremedies in britain, and property preservation and advance execution in china the civil securing judgment procedure system of france, u. s. and britain don t meet the situation and tradition custom of china, while the civil securing judgment procedure system of german and japan has deficiency the conclusion of this chapter is, we should reasonably reform current civil securing judgment procedure system of china, reconstruction the dual civil securing judgment procedure system under the division of property preservation and action preservaition chaptei4 court has the power of jurisdiction this chapter researches into the court which has jurisdiction to different kinds of securing

    筆者認為，民事保全程序存在審理階段的保全程序和執行階段的程序，是特別的訴訟程序和執行程序兼容；民事保全請求權屬于廣義上的訴權；民事保全權屬于裁判權（司法權）和行政權並存；民事保全程序應當體現迅速原則、全面保護雙方當事人；權益原則、程序正當原則、保全措施的標的有限原則；民事保全程序的總目的是為了保護債權人的合法權益，其直接目的有二：一是保障將來執行文書的強制執行，二是：避免將來無法挽回的損失。第三章民事保全的類型本章對各主要國家關於民事保全的類型及其依據逐一作了論述：德國和日本的假扣押與假處分、法國的緊急審理程序和依申請作出裁定的程序、美國的， 、一。扣押和中間禁令、英國的臨時性救濟措施、我國的財產保全和先予執行。
  2. Dispatch of stands follows principle of : first application, first payment, and first arrangement. participants shall fax the bank document to organizing committee after remitting all fees for check

    展位分配原則： 「先申請先付款先安排」參展商在匯出各項費用后，須將銀行匯款單傳真至組委會，以便核查。
  3. The paper also conducted cost and benefit analysis that indicates the protection cost is very much higher in ipr protection in agriculture in china as compared with other countries such as the us and other western countries, this is a very important restricting factor for the patent and pvp application in china. besides, the paper also discussed the possibilities of the unified system like pct and upov for ipr applications to minimize the cost of application and maintainence. with support of survey data and developed models, the papers conclude with the priority area for ipr protection in agriculture in order is as follows : pvp, patent, trade secret, and trade marks

    同時，在大量檢索和設計調查問卷的基礎上，對我國農業知識產權保護的成本和效益進行理論分析，在對比其他國家專利和新品種保護成本的基礎上，分析出我國申請農業知識產權保護的成本和被侵權后的司法訴訟成本過高，影響了我國農業知識產權的申請和保護；此外，文章還就建立類似專利合作條約（ pct ）性質的國際植物新品種保護公約，以期在多國專利同時申請方面實現帕累托最優原則進行了理論探討，在此基礎上，文章進一步對比分析實施農業知識產權保護規則對我國農業技術貿易特別是國外直接投資可能帶來的影響進行，結果表明，強化農業知識產權保護，發展中國家會增加農業技術和產品的進口，發展中的大國更是如此；文章在調查問卷的基礎上提出了我國農業知識產權方面存在的問題和今後農業知識產權保護的目標體系和優先領域，農業知識產權保護的優先順序依次為：新品種、專利、商業秘密、商標和原產地。
  4. First - to - file principle

    申請在先原則
  5. Article 24 where two or more enterprises apply for registration of one same enterprise name which is in conformity with the provisions to the same registration authority, the authority shall examine and verify the application according to the principle of earlier application. thereupon

    第二十四條兩個以上企業向同一登記主管機關申請相同的符合規定的企業名稱，登記主管機關依照申請在先原則核定。
  6. In order to avoid the catastrophic impact to the patent system, the prior user system restricts the qualifications and the scope of the prior user. the third chapter introduces the interest conflict between the employer and the employee in the confidentiality agreement and the non - competition promise. both agreements may affect the flow of the person with ability and the employee ’ s freedom of choosing jobs

    本文的第二部分就著重論述了在先使用權制度是如何通過限定在先使用權的構成要件和在先使用權的權利范圍來協調在先使用人與專利權人之間的利益沖突，使得在先使用權制度成為採用嚴格的申請在先原則下專利制度的有益補充而非災難性的沖擊。
  7. In accordance with standard international practice, item 1 of paragraph 2, article 5 of the enforcement rules of the statute governing the issuance of visas in foreign passports stipulates that for the purposes of the previous item, a valid passport must have at least six months validity remaining on it, except where this has been agreed otherwise by treaty or agreement. in principle, therefore, the passport of an individual wishing to apply for a visa to enter taiwan should have at least six months validity remaining on it

    依國際慣例及我國外國護照簽證條例施行細則第5條第2項1項之規定：前項所定有效護照，其所餘效期應在6個月以上。但條約或協定另有規定者，不在此限。故原則上，申請來臺簽證者的護照效期應為6個月以上，護照效期不足者，除非其所屬國家與我國定有條約或協定，否則應先辦理延長其護照效期，再申請來臺簽證。
分享友人
分享到 Line

分享到臉書