結果責任原則 的英文怎麼說

中文拼音 [jiēguǒzérènyuánzé]
結果責任原則 英文
principle of consequence liability
  • 結 : 結動詞（長出果實或種子） bear （fruit）; form （seed）
  • 果 : Ⅰ名詞1 （果子） fruit 2 （事情的結局; 結果） result ; consequence 3 （姓氏） a surname Ⅱ動詞（吃...
  • 責 : Ⅰ名詞（責任） duty; responsibility Ⅱ動詞1 （要求做成某事或行事達到一定標準） demand; ask for; req...
  • 任 : 任名詞（姓氏） a surname
  • 原 : Ⅰ形容詞1 （最初的; 原來的） primary; original; former 2 （沒有加工的） unprocessed; raw Ⅱ動詞（原...
  • 則 : Ⅰ名詞1 （規范） standard; norm; criterion 2 （規則） regulation; rule; law 3 （姓氏） a surname Ⅱ...
  • 結果 : 結果bear fruit; fruit
  • 責任 : 1. （應做的事） duty; responsibility 2. （應承擔的過失） responsibility for a fault or wrong; blame
  1. There are comprehensive research and discuss on the constitute of result - aggravated crime and classify of it, and on uncompleted - pattern of it and coacting offence, foundation of criminal responsibility, punishment principle in chinese and foreign criminal law academe, and advancing various points of view in various aspects. there are very intensive theoretical disputes

    中外刑法學界對結果加重犯的構成、分類、未遂問題、共同犯罪問題、刑事責任根據、處罰原則等問題進行了廣泛的研究和探討，提出了結果加重犯各個方面的不同觀點，理論爭議較為激烈。
  2. Meantime, it, in the light of concerned foreign views and the brand new reseach achievement on domestic civil fraudulent contract in recent days, accompanied by utilization of some cases in contract laws, has been paid much attention to demonstrating and analying the contents of civil offense, such as, reasons, features, classifications, key components, validity, legal duties and character. this thesis is expected to be taken advantage in the fields of stud } ', prevention and related rules on civil fraudulent conducts by exploiting contracts as well as unifiable institution of civil laws. moreover, we hope to attract more scholars and legal experts who wound like to draw their concerns to the fraudulent conducts by using contracts and eventually develop our national socialism market economy in a sound way

    本文以新《合同法》確定的誠實信用原則為切入點，圍繞合同民事欺詐，參照國外相關觀點及國內當前有關民事欺詐研究的最新成果，結合有關合同法案例，就合同民事欺詐的存在原因、特點及分類，構成要件，效力和法律責任及性質等四個專題進行了深入闡述和分析，對利用合同進行民事欺詐的研究、預防、適用法律等以及統一民法典的制定均有一定的參考作用，同時也期望以此文引起學者及法律專家對民事欺詐的關注和重視，推進我國社會主義市場經濟的健康發展。
  3. As to the doctrine of liability fixation the author thought that, in line with the duty of care of different subject of misrepresentation, ve should built three different standards consequently which were strict liability, fault liability liability on willfulness. as to cautionary relation, this thesis maintained that it could be classified into cautionary relation on transaction and cautionary relation on loss, and that the former was the fast knot on the question of cautionary relation on civil responsibility of misrepresentation, and that we should built presumptive rule on cautionary relation referring to the relative institute of america

    關于歸責原則，作者認為應當根據不同虛假陳述主體對信息披露所負的注意義務提出嚴格責任、過失責任和故意責任三個相應歸責標準，其中，嚴格責任適用於證券發行人，過失責任適用於除發行人之外的其他所有信息披露文體，故意責任適用於中介機構承擔連帶這種特定情形。損害後果作為虛假陳述的必備要件之一，僅限於財產上的損害。對于因果關系，文章將其分為交易的因果關系和損失的因果關系，認為前者是虛假陳述民事責任因果關系的癥結所在。
  4. From published articles about news tort, participants in news circle pay more attention to supervision and priority of liberty value of news but others to importance of protecting legal rights of citizens and legal person. on the whole, the research in tort act law is in beginning and there are so many problems in the stage of imploration and discussion. therefore, that brings about certain difficulty to authorities so as to use different value standard in different courts, which is disadvantageous to seriousness of law and to active function of news medium just as for question about compensation for spiritual harm

    在分析理論界不同觀點和意見分歧的基礎上，闡述了作者自己的觀點，認為新聞侵權民事責任適用過錯責任歸責原則，其構成要件仍符合傳統侵權行為法意義上的四要件說，但在表現形式上有其特殊之處，體現在:第一，行為人通過大眾傳媒實施了有損特定公民和法人人格權的行為;第二，新聞侵權行為造成了一定的損害事實;第三，行為與損害結果之間有因果關系;第四，新聞侵權行為人有過錯。
  5. And the formation that immediate cause principle is the happening that points to dangerous accident and loss result, must have immediate sequential concern, insurance talented person compensates responsibility to the loss that produce

    而近因原則是指危險事故的發生與損失結果的形成，須有直接的後果關系，保險人才對發生的損失補償責任。
  6. This article has been divided into five chapters, the contents of five chapters respectively are : the contents of the first chapter are about pollution compensation that oil leakage of the ships lead to in " maritime law " ; the contents of the second chapter are about delay delivery of the goods in " maritime law " ; the contents of the third chapter are about the cargo lien that the marine carriers have in " maritime law " ; the contents of the fourth chapter are about the rights that the shippers can change and terminate the contract unilaterally in " maritime law " ; the contents of the fifth chapter are about the limitation of liability for maritime claims system in " maritime law ". the contents of each chapter of this article are about a flaw of " maritime law ". as a result of the limit of article length and the limit of author ability, it is impossible to analyze the article of " maritime law " gradually, the article is only about five quite important flaws of " maritime law " to form five chapters, then we will introduce them gradually

    但是，隨著我國加入wto ，國際貿易和海上運輸迅速的發展， 《海商法》在實施中暴露出很多不足。因此，有必要遵循科學性、適時性和法制統一性等立法的基本原則，對《海商法》及時進行修改。筆者認為，應當認真總結《海商法》成功的經驗和失敗的教訓，從目前和今後一個時期海上和與海相通的內陸水域的運輸和經濟貿易的現實和發展對法律的需要出發，參照和借鑒其他民商立法、國際海事條約、民間規則和合同格式，以及國外先進的立法例，吸收海商法理論研究成果，並考慮國際海事立法的發展趨勢，在船舶油污損害賠償的規定，遲延交付的規定，海上貨物留置權的規定，托運人變更解除合同權利的規定，海事賠償責任限制制度的規定等幾個方面修改現行《海商法》 。
  7. The precondition of studying the distribution of burden of proof in civil lawsuit is to correctly set theoretical definitions for burden of proof as well as the object of burden of proof. going through various viewpoints upon the distribution of burden of proof, they, guided by the substantive law and the principle of justice and fairness, have respective limitations, they strive for the predictability and stability of law, but unavoidably face the problem of little flexibility, which might make the results not so fair, the substantive standards highlight a great flexibility, but might cause careless judge due to the uncertainty of standards

    綜觀證明責任分配諸說，雖均以符合實體法宗旨與公平正義原則為指導思想，但各有其局限，形式性標準致力於實現法的可預測性與穩定性，但卻不可避免地存在靈活性不足的問題，可能使證明責任負擔的結果有欠公平，實質性標準實現了靈活性的長處，卻又存在因標準不確定導致法官恣意裁判危及正義的可能。
  8. In the end, this paper lodges the value, principle, mode of the city management and the advice of found the city control index system and the end responsibility of the city management, it wish the new garden city framework which have local color of taizhou will come into realization in the nearly future, and the penman also expects that from this paper we ' ll meeting the study of urbanization have the feature of scientific, operable, reasonable economy, sustainable development, according with local city development

    最後提出重新定位城市管理的價值、原則、方式，和建立城市管理的調控指標體系、城市管理目標責任的建議，以希望具有臺州地方特徵的新田園城市結構模式在不遠的將來得以實現，筆者也希望通過拋磚引玉，迎來科學的、可操作的、經濟合理的、可持續發展的、符合各地城市發展規律的城市化研究成果的不斷涌現。
  9. This paper is divided into four parts to discuss the central problem except for the foreword and conclusion : the first part is devoted to solving the basic problems of aggregated consequential liability in the joint crime, prescribing and describing it from both theory and practice, and illustrates the significance of the study

    據此，文中首先對共同犯罪及結果加重犯的性質特徵進行了論述，提出了結果加重犯的危險性本質決定了共同犯罪人應共同承擔加重結果責任，而各共同犯罪人作為擬制的共同意思主體，應依從屬性原則定罪，依獨立性原則量刑。
  10. If it breaks away from the premise, we ca n ' t draw a hasty conclusion that the fundamental principles of maritime law contain imperfect liabilities for negligence

    如果脫離了這個前提，就不能貿然的得出海商法基本原則中包括不完全過失責任這樣的結論。
  11. Generally speaking, the duty of tort could be divided into two categories, one is " strict liability ", and the other is " negligent liability ". the latter is the main duty of tort law ; the former usually appears in some special fields and industries. as to the compesation that tort - feasor should pay for, it includes compensative damages and punitive damages

    「過錯原則」是侵權行為法的主要歸責原則，而「嚴格責任」主要適用於某些特殊的領域和行業，之所以在發生侵權的場合不能一律運用「嚴格責任原則」 ，原因在於這樣做的社會成本將大於社會收益，從而使得許多有益的社會活動成為不可能，結果是降低了社會的總體福利。
  12. The subjective aspect of instigation is " to have the intention to instigate someone to commit a crime ", namely the intention of instigation. the awareness factor of instigation means recognizing the instigatee ' s liability, the instigatee ' s lacking criminal intention and the instigating action ' s possibility to cause the instigatee to commit a crime. the will factor of instigation includes the attitude towards the instigatee ' s committing the crime and the attitude towards the harmful consequences brought by the crime instigated to committed, both of

    教唆犯的意識因素包括對被教唆人刑事責任能力的認識，對被教唆人原先沒有犯罪意圖的認識，以及對自己行為將使被教唆人產生犯罪意圖並實施該犯罪的認識;教唆犯的意志因素包括其對被教唆人實施被教唆的犯罪的態度及對被教唆人接受教唆實施犯罪造成的危害結果的態度，這兩種態度都既可能是希望，也可能是放任;對于為陷害他人而教唆他人實施只能達于未遂的犯罪的教唆行為，在目前的情形下，應依教唆犯處理， .但若刑法對此類行為予以明確規定，尤其是在刑法分則中將其規定為獨立的罪名，則更為可取。
  13. The latter is a theoretical innovation, it criticizes the given model in chinese securities market in which only get the csrc ' s affirmation of iniuria firstly can you claim for damages. then go to the causation, with several european countries as background, the author initially supposes we should adopt the " scope of the rule " theory to solve the causation problem of the liability on manipulations, thereof simplifying the abstract and complex speculation over the causation, merely by thinking through the scope and attempt of law can we judge itfinally, in dealing with damage measure, different from the prevailing method by which scholars often choose one way from three alternatives, those are " out - of - pocket " measure, " defendant ' s profit " measure and " plaintiff ' s loss " measure, the author advises a new appoach that fundamentally applying the first measure and supplementary applying the two measures else, it is expected to fairly settle the puzzling problem in damage measure

    在因果關系部分，本文以主要歐洲國家的因果法理為背景，開創性地提出採用法規目的說解決操縱市場行為責任范圍因果關系的問題，使抽象的因果推定回歸到僅依法規目的與意義考察的單純境界。最後在損害結果部分，與學界通常在「直接損失衡量法」 、 「被告獲利計演算法」以及「原告損失計演算法」中三選一的思維定式不同，提出以直接損失衡量法為原則並輔之以其餘二者的折衷解決方案，以期公平解決損害結果在計算上的難題。
  14. Therefore, its essential characteristics should be reflected in the legislation of our country on the basis of correctly understanding the theory of breaking away from the accomplice relationship, taking “ breaking way from the accomplice relationship ” as the determining standard for the discontinuance of crime of partial accomplice, holding that if the criminal, who has taken the sincere and diligent behaviors to prevent the occurrence of criminal results but fail because some uncontrollable factors occur in the process of joint offense, is determinned as the discontinuance of crime, and the responsibility investigation is carried out according to the punishment principles suited for the discontinued criminal

    鑒于以上問題的存在，筆者認為，應該在對脫離共犯關系理論進行正確理解的基礎上，在我國立法中體現其本質特徵，以「脫離共犯關系」作為認定部分共犯人犯罪中止的標準，將在共同犯罪過程中，自動停止了自己的犯罪行為，並作出了真摯努力去阻止犯罪結果的發生，卻由於自己無法控制的因素而沒能成功的部分共犯人認定為犯罪中止，並以中止犯的處罰原則來進行責任追究。
  15. To check the network crime, the author put forward proposal of lowering age for penalty and increasing unit crime in the light of that which tendency of low age is more apparent and unit crime arise too many, introducing strict liability in view of that which intentional or disintentional network crime is discriminated difficultly. to meet preventive needs, criminal law should alter result crime to dangerous or behaviour crime. because objective essentialia negotii of network crime is distinct from traditional crime, criminal law should replenish two criminal articals : crime of stealing computer network ; crime of providing computer network

    該部分提出了應對網路犯罪的一系列刑法對策，針對網路犯罪主體的低齡化趨勢明顯和單位犯罪大量出現的問題，提出了就網路犯罪要陽氏相對負刑事責任年齡和增設單位網路犯罪的主張;針對網路犯罪罪過的過失與故意的難辯性，提出要引進嚴格責任的歸責原則;對客觀要件上的特殊哇，主張前置打擊力度，將網路犯罪由結果犯設置為危險犯或者行為犯;最後在客體要件上，依據客體侵犯的是復雜j客體，提出要增加竊用計算機網路服務罪和提供計算機網路犯罪等罪名。
  16. The author points out that its constitutive requirements include the act of one party who breaches the pre - contract obligations, subjective fault of the party who breaches the pre - contract obligations, damages suffered by the aggrieved party, and the causation relation between the act in violation of the pre - contract obligations and the harmful consequence. the article further expounds the scope of application of the contracting fault liability, which includes the non - formation of the contract, invalidity of the contract, cancellation of the contract, the contract being formed but not coming into effect, the scope of compensation for the contracting fault liability should be confined to trust interest losses

    同時分析了締約過失責任的法理基礎? ?誠實信用原則，並指出其構成要件應為：締約一方有違反先合同義務的行為，違反先合同義務方主觀上有過錯，對方受到損害，違反先合同義務行為與損害結果有因果關系；接著進一步詳細論述了締約過失責任適用的范圍：合同不成立、合同無效、合同被撤銷、合同已成立但未生效；然後明確了締約過失賠償范圍是信賴利益損失。
分享友人
分享到 Line

分享到臉書