自衛權 的英文怎麼說
中文拼音 [zìwèiquán]
自衛權
英文
privilege of self-defence-
State right of self - defense in fighting against international terrorism
試論打擊國際恐怖主義中的國家自衛權Under current international law, the victim state should meet four requirements in exercising the right of self - defense. first, there should be actual armed attack ; second, the action of self - defense should be necessary and proportionate ; third, the un security council has not taken necessary action to maintain international peace and security, and ; forth, the victim state should report to the security council immediately about the action it has taken to defend itself
行使自衛權必須滿足四項要求：一是遭受實際發生的武力攻擊並且該武力攻擊針對的是受害國的領土或該國的海陸空部隊；二是符合必要性和相稱性原則；三是聯合國安理會尚未採取必要措施以維持世界和平與安全；四是受害國必須立即就其採取的自衛行動向安理會報告。The right to self - defense is a natural right of countries, as well as all countries to respect other country ' s sovereignty and territorial general obligation exception
自衛權是一個國家的自然權利，也是所有國家尊重其他國家領土主權的一般性義務的例外。The author of this essay believes that only if a terrorist attack constitutes armed attack, the victim state has the right to do so. the victim state should strictly observe all the four requirements mentioned above. the targets should be limited to the terrorist group which carried out the terrorist attack and the state ( states ) which goaded, directed, controlled or tolerated the terrorist attack
此外，本文認為受害國有權在恐怖主義行動構成武力攻擊的情況下對其行使自衛權，但是受害國應向國際社會提供確鑿的相關證據並應嚴格遵守必要性和相稱性原則，並且對恐怖主義進行自衛的對象應限於實施了構成武力攻擊的恐怖主義行動的恐怖主義組織以及指導、控制、唆使或縱容該恐怖主義行動的國家。Then we ' ll exercise our right of self - defence
那樣我們就要行使我們的自衛權了。International terrorism and the necessity principle of self - defense
國際恐怖主義與自衛權行使的必要性To view us ' defensive and anti - terrorism military action from the the nation ' s defensive right on the basis of international law
從國際法上國家的自衛權看美國自衛性反恐軍事行動The un charter, in article 51, recognizes this right and sets several limitations on it
自此，國家不再享有憲章第51條規定之外的在國際習慣法上曾被認為是合法的其他任何形式的自衛權。It is necessary for the right to self - defense in conditions appropriate to expand and better protect the country ' s security
因而有必要在自衛權的條件上適當擴大，更好地保護國家的安全權利。Yet the question, even then, is what japan may do to help its ally, given japanese strictures against collective self - defence
即便如此，考慮到日本對集體自衛權的嚴格限制，問題則是日本可向其盟國提供何種幫助。A right to collective self - defence underpins mr abe ' s broader ambition, which is to ensure that japan can play a bigger role in international security
加強集體自衛權是安倍的野心所在，確保了日本在國際安全事務中發揮更大作用。With regard to the transfer of military equipment and related technology, china respects the right of every country to self - defence aimed at safeguarding its own security in accordance with the relevant principles contained in the charter of the united nations, but at the same time it is very concerned about the adverse effects on world security and regional stability arising from excessive accumulations of weaponry
中國在軍事裝備及其技術轉讓問題上，尊重世界各國按照《聯合國憲章》有關原則擁有維護自身安全的自衛權利，也關切武器裝備的過度積累對世界安全和地區穩定產生的不利影響。The united states an excuse to exercise its right of self - defense against iraq and the war on the existing united nations system of collective security and on the right of self - defense the conditions for the challenge
美國借口行使自衛權而對伊拉克發動的戰爭是對現存的聯合國集體安全體制和關于自衛權的實施條件的挑戰。But he has not succeeded at what ought to have been his priority : the rewriting of japan ' s constitution, which renounces war, to assert japan ' s right to participate in collective security
但在他看來的頭等大事? ?修改日本那部聲明放棄戰爭的憲法? ?宣布日本有集體自衛權上沒有成功。On the basis of the analysis of history and present conditions, the author predicts that perhaps japan will continue to maintain and strenghthen the japan - american security system and try to establish new cooperative system, continue to strenghthen the forces " power ; continue to exercise collective defending right with the usa, and try to amend the present constitution to untie the self - defense forces
日本的歷史和現狀是我們對其進行預測的基礎，筆者相信日本會繼續保持和加強日美安保體制，並謀求建立新的合作體制；繼續增強軍隊的實力；繼續與美國行使集體自衛權，以修改和平憲法，將軍事觸角更多的伸向海外。With regard to the transfer of military equipment and related technology, china respects the right of every country to independent or collective self - defense and to acquisition of weapons for this purpose in accordance with the principles contained in the charter of the united nations, but at the same time it is concerned about the adverse effects on world security and regional stability arising from excessive accumulations of weaponry
在軍事裝備及其技術轉讓問題上，中國尊重各國根據聯合國憲章的原則所享有的單獨或集體自衛權利以及為此目的獲取武器的權利，同時也關切武器裝備的過度積累對世界安全和地區穩定所產生的不利影響。Instances of armed conflict without declaration of war may include, but are not necessarily limited to, the exercise of armed force pursuant to a recommendation, decision, or call by the united nations, in the exercise of the inherent right of individual or collective self - defense against armed attack, or in the performance of enforcement measures through a regional arrangement, or otherwise, in conformity with appropriate provisions of the united nations charter
未宣戰的武裝沖突狀態得包含但不限於依據聯合國所勸告、決議、召集的武裝力量，對抗武裝攻擊的個人天賦權利或集體自衛權利，實施局部性安排或與符合聯合國憲章適切條款的強制性手段。This paper from the united states the " preemptive strategy " of the formation and development proceed, it discussed the basic problems and other responsibilities associated with the distinction between countries of the right to self - defense theory of history. important, the international community accepted the theory and history of the united states on the theory of " alternative " - " preemptive strategy " of, in - depth understanding of the meaning of the right to national self - defense, the united states and explore the " preemptive strategy " substantive. with detailed historical data reveals the united states " pioneer officer strategy, " the intention behind it, the disclosure of the dark side of the theory
本文從美國的「先發制人戰略」的形成和發展著手，討論它的基本問題及與其它相關責任的區別，通過對國家自衛權理論的研究歷史、重要內容、國際社會接受該理論的歷程及美國對該理論的「變通」 「先發制人戰略」的探討，深入了解何謂國家自衛權及探究美國「先發制人戰略」實質.以詳盡的史料揭示美國「先發制人戰略」背後的意圖，披露該理論的陰暗面The right of self - defense is an inherent and natural right of states, which is well established in customary international law. however, neither the customary international law nor international treaties have given clear and systematic regulation of this important right
自衛權是國家根據主權原則而享有的一項自然權利，在國際習慣法上已有悠久的歷史，但是在國際習慣法和國際法律文件中都沒有明確的定義和系統的規定。U. s. strategic policy change has not only exacerbated the turmoil in the world, a threat to world peace, while its right to national self - defense theory, the treaty ' s extension and abuse, serious distortion of the " united nations charter, " which related to the right to national self - defense as the meaning, constitute the norms of international law on the huge impact and challenges
美國這一戰略方針的改變，不僅加劇了世界的動蕩，威脅到了世界和平，同時其對國家自衛權理論、條約的引申和濫用，嚴重曲解了《聯合國憲章》中國家自衛權相關內容的含義，構成了對國際法準則的巨大沖擊和挑戰。分享友人