訴訟性質 的英文怎麼說

中文拼音 [sùsòngxìngzhí]
訴訟性質 英文
nature of action
  • 訴 : 動詞1. （說給人） tell; relate; inform 2. （傾吐） complain; accuse 3. （控告） appeal to; resort to
  • 訟 : 動詞1. （打官司） bring a case to court 2. （爭辯是非） dispute; argue
  • 性 : Ⅰ名詞1 （性格） nature; character; disposition 2 （性能; 性質） property; quality 3 （性別） sex ...
  • 質 : Ⅰ名詞1 （性質; 本質） nature; character; essence 2 （質量） quality 3 （物質） matter; substance;...
  • 訴訟 : [法律] lawsuit; litigation; legal action; judicial action; action
  1. In all capital or criminal prosecutions a man has a right to demand the cause and nature of his accusation, to be confronted with the accusers and witnesses.

    在所有死刑或刑事訴訟中，個人有權要求知道被控告的原因與性質，有權要求與控告者和證人進行對質。
  2. On the one hand, on the basis of analyzing the relationship between criminal lawsuit and civil lawsuit as well as with reference to the basis constitution of suit, it arguer that civil lawsuit attached to criminal lawsuit is a kind of special civil lawsuit, and thus delimits it in terms of its nature

    第二部分題為刑事附帶民事訴訟制度的性質與價值取向。一方面從分析刑事附帶民事訴訟制度中刑事訴訟與附帶民事訴訟的關系入手，以訴的基本構成為參照，論證了刑事附帶民事訴訟是一種特殊的民事訴訟這一本質，從性質上為制度重構界定方向。
  3. Questioning the necessarity of administrative with civil action

    行政附帶民事訴訟必要性質疑
  4. The difference of litigation model between two families of law makes a distinction between expert witness and lay witness in the fields of service target, dispatch, impanel and nature standing in litigation ; the second chapter of article surveys the problems arising from expert system practice and actual application of expert witness in judicial practice, and demonstrates the existing condition and necessity of setting up expert witness in our country ; the third chapter of article builds up them in the regards of subject of expert witness, qualification, launch, impanel and adoption of expert ’ comments

    而兩大法系訴訟模式的差異，使專家證人與鑒定人在服務對象、啟動和選任以及在訴訟中的性質地位上存在較大的區別;本文第二章考察我國鑒定製度在運行過程中產生的問題和專家證人在司法實踐中實際運用，論證我國確立專家證人存在的現實基礎和必要性;本文第三章，從專家證人的主體、資格、啟動和選任及專家意見的可采性等方面進行了構建。
  5. Since the legal provision cannot be sued in most cases, the suability of the legal provision actually means that the legal provision could be used as the foundation of the findings made by the court

    該章從可訴性概念的一般性分析入手，認為，可訴性是指法律行為的可訴性，法律自身的性質決定了它在大多數情況下不可能成為訴訟的對象。
  6. First, the author discusses the natures of subrogating rights and subrogating action

    首先，討論了代位權、代位訴訟的性質。
  7. Aimed at the causes of the crime of inquisition by torture and confession - extortion, part iv probes into the measures of prevention and cure for it from six aspects as the following : converting creatively the traditional law culture and value concept ; adjusting the way of social control ; rectifying the tipstaff ’ s concept of law - execution and improving their professional quality ; regulating and consummating the litigation rules ; perfecting the law rules and regulations ; and guaranteeing the devotion of judicial resources

    第四部分:針對刑訊逼供之成因，文章從創造性轉換傳統法律文化和價值觀念、調整社會控制方式、矯正司法人員執法理念和提高其專業素質、確立與完善訴訟規則、完善法網規制、加大司法資源投入等六個方面，探討了刑訊逼供犯罪的防治對策。
  8. How to use of the currently in effect criminal procedure expert testimony system in the normal way, administrative control expert testimony institution and office workers, amplify necessary rules and regulations of the actuating of expert conclusion 、 implement of expert conclusion 、 argumentation of expert conclusion 、 authentication of expert conclusion ; up to protect litigation rights of parties in action, get on the stick of administration of justice 、 successfully achieve an end of administration of reasonable judgment all along is the focal point of the work and difficult point in our expert testimony system structure. in this paper, coupling our current the present situation of criminal expert testimony, to perfect the legal system, to resolve the problems of expert testimony system, the writer tried to study some problems of giving some enlightenment to the theory and practice of judicial appraisal institution, relate and analyze it and set forth the views and opinions on the settlement of some matters with six parts

    本文從分析刑事司法鑒定及其程序入手，比較兩大法系關于刑事司法鑒定的啟動、實施、質證、認證與採信等司法證明各環節的制度規定，透視我國刑事司法鑒定程序存在的基本問題，在此基礎上提出:規定鑒定期限、對無鑒定結果不能進入訴訟或準司法程序的情況，當事人可以申請公證機關公證鑒定啟動程序的真實性和合理性、建立鑒定人出庭作證制度、裁判者對鑒定結論認證通過質證程序形成心證的過程及理由應做出公開說明等有利於我國刑事司法鑒定程序改革的具體構想。
  9. In order to get a better understanding of the nature of arbitrators, this dissertation has then made a comparison in respect of the provisions on the qualification of arbitrations at home and abroad. targeting on the blind transplantation of judicial proceedings into arbitral proceedings by some arbitration institutions after the implementation of the arbitration law, this dissertation has compared and studied the difference between judges and arbitrators

    為了準確地認識仲裁員的性質，本文就中外仲裁法律中關于仲裁員資格的規定作了制度比較，並從法理上對民商事訴訟主體即法官與仲裁員的主要區別作了比較分析，從而針對仲裁員的非職業性的特點和幾年來仲裁工作的實踐，就仲裁員應當具備什麼樣的資格條件作了探討。
  10. It is the different between the procedure of bankruptcy law for natural person and the civial suit, non - suit

    本文認為自然人破產程序兼有執行和清算兩種性質，自然人破產屬于不同於民事訴訟和非訟案件的特殊事件。
  11. The development of the right path of the reform of the civil adjudication system, the reasonable solution of modern litigation as well as the present state of the cultural cultivation, law cultivation of the citizens in our country decide that it is a realistic urgency for china to set up the hermeneutic right

    其認為民事審判制度改革向正確方向的發展，現代訴訟的合理解決，以及我國公民文化素質，法律素質的現狀等社會情勢決定了我國建立釋明權具有現實的緊迫性。第五部分：我國釋明權制度的建構。
  12. Concept and nature of criminal procedure with collateral civil proceedings

    刑事附帶民事訴訟的概念和性質
  13. The conclusion discusses the source of the malady of judicature. in spite of the differences between court mediation and judgment, there is the common character of informalization under the value of objective fact. therefore, the separation of them will not become effective

    結淪：調解與判決在訴訟形態層面的差別無法超越客觀真實訴訟價值下非形式化的共同本質，客觀真實作為訴訟價值的局限性是司法諸多弊端的根源所在。
  14. In chapter three, it mainly deals with the concept and nature of the criminal appeal. the author advises : that the criminal appeal should be changed into criminal application procedure for review is an important aspect of our procedure for prosecutorial supervision over adjudication which is both scientific and perfect

    並且指出在改革和完善刑事再審程序時，正確地平衡和協調再審程序中的司法公正和訴訟效率的關系是其關鍵。第三章主要論述了申訴的概念和性質。並且筆者指出把刑事申訴制度改造成刑事申請再審制度是完善刑事再審制度的一個重要方面。
  15. These measures include : make the system of securities laws to perfect, consummate the institutions of the legal person in the listed companies, base securities regulatory authority to regulate the securities market according to law, maintain order of the securities market and ensure the lawful operation of the same, reinforce continuing disclosure of information and the system of financial and accounting reports, make the listed companies shall immediately submit an ad hoc report on the details of such major event to the securities regulatory authority and to the stock exchanging and the same known to the general public, promote investors consciousness of protecting themselves and consummate the civil litigation mechanism to gain compensation and damages, make use of the press to supervise the stock market and reinforce punishment to the persons who act securities fraud

    在這些原則的指導下，本文提出了一套規制證券欺詐的具體法律措施.包括健全證券法律體系，做到證券欺詐的規制有法可依;完善上市公司的法人治理結構，建立完善的證券監管體系，尤其對證券業協會的性質、功能和職責從法律上給予明確界定以確保充分發揮證券行業的自律作用，最大限強化信息披露責任，嚴格會計制度，力求信度地避免證券欺詐行為發生;強化信息披露貢任，產格會計刷度，刀水侶息準確，披露及時;增強廣大中小投資者的自我保護意識，完善賠償訴訟機制;依法賦予新聞媒體輿論監督權，充分發揮新聞媒體監督作用;深入研究證券欺詐者心理規律，加強法律懲治力度
  16. The acts of court are judicial acts aiming at resolving dispute, while the administrative acts are performing acts. litigants " acts are based on the right of access to justice, which is a procedural right. as to the scope of acts in civil litigation, it should not include all the behaviors that have the procedural results, and only the acts that have expected results in procedural law, can be included

    訴訟行為的性質因行為主體的不同而不同：法院的訴訟行為是一種公法行為，表現為針對糾紛的居中裁判行為，裁判性是其區別於行政行為的關鍵點；當事人的訴訟行為則以訴權為權利基礎，訴權是一種程序上的權利，以私人謀取公法效果為目的，這決定了當事人的訴訟行為的程序l性，是一種對應于審判行為的私人程序性行為。
  17. In view of the above, the grantor hereby, unconditionally and irrevocably, indemnifies and keeps the grantee harmless from any and all liabilities ( either for criminal or private action ), damages, claim, fine, charge, costs, expenses which may be imposed by any government authority or courts or any party to the grantee or where the grantee may become liable with respect the utilization or misused or accident in relation to the utilization of the explosive materials by the grantor, its employees, personnel, successor, and / or any party appointed by the grantor as mentioned above

    鑒于上述情況，授予人應無條件、不能撤回地賠償被授予人，並使被授予人在任何政府或法院或參與者面前免於其被強加的法律責任，包括（無論是刑事訴訟還是民事訴訟） 、損失、索賠、罰款、責令、訴訟費等一切費用；或者當被授予人由於使用或誤用或可能在與使用授予人、其雇員、人員、繼承人、和/或授予人任命的任何參與者提供的爆炸性物質相關的事故中承擔法律責任時，授予人同樣要無條件、不能撤回地賠償被授予人，並且使被授予人免於上述責任。
  18. The right of evidential investigation of lawyers in criminal proceedings means the lawyers can meet the suspects or the accused, read the files, and investigate evidence to discover and acquire all kinds of relative evidential materials to prove that the suspects or accused are innocent or only commit lighter crimes, or the criminal liabilities upon them shall be abated or exempted, thus, the legal interests of the suspects and accused are protected

    刑事訴訟中律師調查取證權是指律師接受刑事案件當事人的委託，採取會見、閱卷、調查等方法，發現和取得與案件有關的各種證據材料，證明犯罪嫌疑人、被告人無罪、罪輕、或者減輕、免除刑事責任，維護其合法權益。律師的調查取證權在性質上是舉證責任，控訴方的調查取證權性質上是證明責任。
  19. All or any dispute howsoever arising directly or indirectly under or in respect of these by - laws or any of them in regard to any matter, act, event or thing of whatsoever nature arising or occurring hereunder shall be governed by and interpreted in accordance with the laws of hong kong wherever the act or event or thing shall take place and whatever the nationality, domicile or usual place of residence of any person or party to such dispute and every action or claim arising directly or indirectly therefrom brought by or against the corporation shall be and the same is hereby submitted to the exclusive jurisdiction of a competent court of jurisdiction in hong kong

    凡根據或就本附例或其任何條文而直接或間接引致的一切或任何糾紛（不論如何引致） ，如涉及任何根據或就本附例或其任何條文而引致或發生的任何性質的事情、作為、事件或事物，則不論該行為或事件或事物於何處發生，亦不論與該糾紛有關的任何人或任何一方的國籍、居籍或本籍或慣常居住地為何，均須受香港法例管限並按照香港法例解釋；因該糾紛而直接或間接引致的由公司或針對公司提出的每宗訴訟或申索，須受在香港具司法管轄權的法院的專有審判權所限。
  20. The theory and legislation of proof limitation system is an important part of proof burden system and the judicial procedure of civil law. due to its conflict with substantial justice, the system of time limit for proof limitation could make the judgment of value and realize its value of rational justice only in the litigation notion of justice of formalities

    任何制度的存在和發展都應有其內在的價值取向，作為訴訟程序制度內容一部分的舉證時限制度，由於與實質正義的立場存有一定的對立性，其本身也只有在程序正義的訴訟理念下，才能發揮其價值評價的功效，才能夠在追尋結果的過程中達到一種相對平衡的理性正義價值。
分享友人
分享到 Line

分享到臉書