civil judicial procedure 中文意思是什麼
civil judicial procedure
解釋
民事訴訟程序-
In the first place, we should prevent deviation of the value of procedure ; in the second place, justice would be brought into effect by law. the civil judicial law which is executing in current should be strengthened in openness of judge, neutrality of gownsman, adjudgement without plaintiff or appellee, and so on
最後，文章論述了民事訴訟程序價值保障，要防止程序異化，要通過法律實現正義，具體在公開審判、法官中立、缺席審判等八個方面對民事訴訟法提出了完善建議。 -
The center of civil judicial reformation is to reappraise the value of civil litigation procedure
民事審判方式改革的核心問題就是要重新評價程序價值。 -
Civil adjudication supervision procedure is an important part of china ' s trial system. studying and probing the connotation, function and jurisprudence basis of the system is beneficial to objectively recognize, evaluate and upgrade china ' s current judicial system. moreover, it is also beneficial to the research and development of china ' s system of action
民事審判監督程序是我國審判制度的重要的組成部分，研究和探討該制度的涵義、功能和法理基礎等，有利於客觀認識、評價和完善我國當前的司法體制，有利於我國訴訟體制的研究和發展。 -
As a national system of judicial certification and associate judicial act, the legal status and effectiveness of notarization has been established by the current civil procedure law and interim notarization regulation
我國現行《民事訴訟法》 、 《公證暫行條例》等法律確認了公證的法律地位和法律效力。 -
Though the code of civil procedure in our country did not make the explicit formulation to the judicial cognition, but this issue was attached great importance in the theories field and judicial circle, the related judicial interpretation of the supreme people ' s court formulate the principle provision of this issue, at the same time, parts of scholars in judicial procedure also did more research of this issue
在我國，盡管民事訴訟法對司法認知未作明確規定，但是這個問題卻引起了理論界和實務界的高度重視，最高人民法院的相關司法解釋對此作出了原則性規定，同時部分訴訟法學者也加強了對這一證據規則的研究。 -
Securing judgment procedure is to protect the legal rights of creditor, under that aim, there also exist two direct aim, one is safeguard the execute of the judicial addict made in the future, the other is to avoid the unredemptive damages chapter 3 the type of civil securing judgment procedure this chapter researches into the type of civil securing judgment procedure and relevant legal basis in main countries, including the arrest and einstweligeverfugung in germany and japan, the juger en refere iprocedure and qrdanance sur requite in france, attachment, temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction in u. s, pre - judgement rremedies in britain, and property preservation and advance execution in china the civil securing judgment procedure system of france, u. s. and britain don t meet the situation and tradition custom of china, while the civil securing judgment procedure system of german and japan has deficiency the conclusion of this chapter is, we should reasonably reform current civil securing judgment procedure system of china, reconstruction the dual civil securing judgment procedure system under the division of property preservation and action preservaition chaptei4 court has the power of jurisdiction this chapter researches into the court which has jurisdiction to different kinds of securing
筆者認為，民事保全程序存在審理階段的保全程序和執行階段的程序，是特別的訴訟程序和執行程序兼容；民事保全請求權屬于廣義上的訴權；民事保全權屬于裁判權（司法權）和行政權並存；民事保全程序應當體現迅速原則、全面保護雙方當事人；權益原則、程序正當原則、保全措施的標的有限原則；民事保全程序的總目的是為了保護債權人的合法權益，其直接目的有二：一是保障將來執行文書的強制執行，二是：避免將來無法挽回的損失。第三章民事保全的類型本章對各主要國家關於民事保全的類型及其依據逐一作了論述：德國和日本的假扣押與假處分、法國的緊急審理程序和依申請作出裁定的程序、美國的， 、一。扣押和中間禁令、英國的臨時性救濟措施、我國的財產保全和先予執行。 -
The theory and legislation of proof limitation system is an important part of proof burden system and the judicial procedure of civil law. due to its conflict with substantial justice, the system of time limit for proof limitation could make the judgment of value and realize its value of rational justice only in the litigation notion of justice of formalities
任何制度的存在和發展都應有其內在的價值取向，作為訴訟程序制度內容一部分的舉證時限制度，由於與實質正義的立場存有一定的對立性，其本身也只有在程序正義的訴訟理念下，才能發揮其價值評價的功效，才能夠在追尋結果的過程中達到一種相對平衡的理性正義價值。 -
Part two : the legislation reform in judicial area. it mainly includes constitutional law criminal law and criminal procedure law, civil law legislation
第二部分是司法領域的立法改革，主要包括憲法、刑法和刑事訴訟法、民事立法方面的改革。 -
Upon this, the writer himself, to take his own meager knowledge, try to search for some rational internal cores for the reform of the civil trial style, civil trial system, civil procedure system and even the whole judicial system, from the source of 5 the theory and system, that is, the " civil trial power
正是基於此，作者於是不揣淺陋，力圖從理論和制度層面的源頭，即「民事審判權」上來為民事審判方式、民事審判制度、民事訴訟制度乃至整個司法制度的改革找尋到一些合理的內核。 -
This thesis put forward four core categories in civil procedure law which are litigious right, litigious duty, judicial function and judicial duty of civil procedure by thinking about the traditional “ litigation right ? ? litigation duty ” pattern and “ lawsuit right ? ? jurisdiction power ” pattern repeatedly and analyse their defects. meanwhile this thesis analyse their relationship especially the relationship between the judicial right of civil procedure, judicial duty of civil procedure and judicial power of civil procedure deeply
本文通過對傳統的「民事訴訟權利? ?民事訴訟義務」模式和「民事訴權? ?民事審判權」模式的重新思考，剖析其不足，提出民事訴訟權利、民事訴訟義務、民事訴訟職權、民事訴訟職責是民事訴訟法學的內在聯系的四個核心范疇，並就其關系特別是民事訴訟職權和民事訴訟職責的關系進行了深入的分析。 -
Evidence system is one of the most important questions in the civil proceedings and standard of proof is an important question in the evidence system. the civil procedure law applies the standard of " highly probable " in civil litigations. this article points out that it is not reasonable to adopt the " highly probable " standard in all civil litigations. firstly, this article mentions the important meaning of standard of proof in judicial proof. secondly, it pionts out the flaws in the standard of proof in civil litigation in our country. thirdly, it introduces the standard of proof in civil litigation in common law and civil law countries and analyzes the similar and different points in the standard of proof. finally this article points out several suggestions to rebuild the system of standard of proof. lt suggests we should construct a system which considers the " highly probable " standard as a principle and adopts other forms of standard of proof in sepcial civil cases. and we can build this reasonable system by means of legislation and case law
但在所有民事案件中均劃一適用較高程度的蓋然性作為證明標準是不合理的。文章首先闡明了民事訴訟證明標準在訴訟證明中的重要意義，然後對於我國有關民事訴訟證明標準的現狀及其缺陷作了一個概括，接著文章對于兩大法系民事訴訟證明標準的異同進行了介紹以及比較分析，最後提出了對于構建一個科學的民事訴訟證明標準體系的幾點建議。文章建議應當通過立法以及判例制度來建立一個以較高程度的蓋然性為原則的多元的證明標準體系。 -
The right of adverseris can n ' t be fully protected and the re - trial in civil procedure twisted. the author also proves the necessity and feasibility of reform the system. the development of the society and the higher request to the judicial process make the reform necessary, and the development of theory provide opportunity for the reform
作者還進一步論證了對案外人異議制度進行改革、建立執行異議之訴的必要性與可行性，認為社會的發展、對保護權利和健全法制日益高的要求使案外人異議制度的改革成為必要，而訴訟領域的改革與執行領域理論的發展也為這一改革提供了契機。 -
Now that the basis, theory boundary being sentenced to force have system to render a service saying mainly, procedure ensures lower say, double ego imputation basis composing the quarrel, country judicial authority says civil court decision
民事判決既判力的根據，理論界主要有制度效力說、程序保障下的自我歸責說、雙重根據說和國家審判權說。 -
( 3 ) clarify the judicial hierarchy and the litigation / civil protest period. ( 4 ) define the position, function and competency of the prosecuting authority within the retrial procedure
此外，還就抗訴條件、審理級別、審理期限和檢察機關在再審中的地位、任務及權限進行了論述。 -
With the process of resolution of difficulty of civil enforcement and rectification of disorder of enforcement, civil enforcement procedure reform have been taken into account by courts as a part of civil judicial procedure reform, and the enactment of civil enforcement law has been one of focuses of discussion and investigation both in theories and in practice, however, reform of civil enforcement organization and rebuild enforcement power is critical issue in civil enforcement procedure reform and in the enactment of civil enforcement law
伴隨著解決民事「執行難」和整治民事「執行亂」運動的深入，民事執行方式改革已經納入法院大民事審判方式改革的議程，對民事強制執行予以單獨立法也開始成為理論界和實務界討論的熱點問題之一，而如何對民事執行權進行正確配置是進行執行方式改革和進行民事強制執行單獨立法的核心課題。 -
At the same time, the author thinks the establishment of the theory on res judicate can really reach the ultimate target of civil lawsuit - judicial authority, procedural justice, the economy and efficiency and procedure stability with suppression of repeating the litigation
同時認為，既判力理論的確立，其價值取向上能夠真正達到民事訴訟的終極目標? ?司法權威、程序正義、訴訟效益和經濟、程序安定和遏制重復訴訟得以實現的功能。 -
The thesis ? s theoretical significance lies in enriching the theoretical study of our country ? s summary procedure by binging forward own special views. its practical significance lies in the following facts : it gives advisements for amending the judicial interpretations of our country ? s civil summary procedure. and it also gives references for advancing summary procedure legislation and modifying our country ? s code of civil law
其理論意義在於：對簡易程序相關理論問題提出自己的獨特見解，豐富簡易程序理論研究；其實踐意義在於：對司法解釋的改進提出建議，為促進我國簡易程序立法完善與民事訴訟法的修改提供參考。 -
Basing on the condition of our country, the author explains the concept and classifications of the withdrawal system of civil procedure, reviews its history and gives a deep analyze of its litigation and judicial conditions
本文立足我國國情，在廓清民事訴訟迴避制度的概念、分類的基礎上，重溫了迴避制度尤其是民事訴訟迴避制度的歷史沿革，並對其立法和司法現狀進行深入分析。 -
And then deeply dissects the four reasons, by changing the idea of “ substance is more important than procedure ”, rethinking the judicial and cultural tradition, perfecting the legislation and relative systems, the author hopes to realize the original aim of the withdrawal system of civil procedure
並對這三個原因進行深入剖析，在轉變「重實體、輕程序」的觀念、對司法、文化傳統進行深刻反思的基礎上，完善現行立法，建立健全現行民事訴訟迴避制度相關制度，以期實現設立民事訴訟迴避制度的初衷。 -
In judicial practice of civil procedure, a tough question was produced as whether the traditional rules of territorial jurisdiction for infringements apply to the cyberspace
在民事訴訟實踐中，我們面臨的首要問題就是：指導傳統侵權之訴的地域管轄規則在網路侵權案中是否仍然適用
分享友人