court of retrial 中文意思是什麼
court of retrial
解釋
再審法院-
On retrial civil court system with the characteristics of reconstruction
論法院提起民事再審制度的特質與重構 -
" for the retrial of a remanded case, the people ' s court of first instance shall form a new collegial panel in accordance with the procedure of first instance.
發回重審的案件，原審人民法院應當按照第一審程序另行組成合議庭。 -
Article 192 the people ' s court which originally tried a case shall form a new collegial panel for the case remanded to it for retrial, in accordance with the procedure of first instance
第一百九十二條原審人民法院對于發回重新審判的案件，應當另行組成合議庭，依照第一審程序進行審判。 -
In the treatise, the author believes that civil procedure for trial supervision is a procedure that people ' s procuratorate, on the basis of legal supervision rights, or a party to an action, on the basis of rights to apply for retrial, finds that there is error in a legally effective judgment or mediation agreement made by a people ' s court and asks for the court to retrial
筆者認為，民事審判監督程序是指人民檢察院基於法律監督權，當事人基於再審申請權，認為人民法院已生效的民事判決或調解協議確有錯誤，依照法定程序，要求人民法院並由人民法院依法對該案件進行再審的程序。 -
In the application of criminal supervision procedure regard, we should perfect the legislation on subject of complaint cause of appeal, period of petition for retrial, mode of appeal, in order to set up litigious right of action in supervision procedure ; on the reform of the judicial mechanism in the retrial, we should enhance jurisdictional rank of retrial and increase transparence of retrial hearing, we should define the time limit for retrial and implement the system of court of first instance being the final in the retrial
在再審程序啟動機制上，完善再審申請主體、申請理由、申請期限、申請方式等制度規范，建立再審申請之訴；在再審審判機制改革中，應提高再審管轄審級、增加審理程序透明度、嚴格規范審理期限，並實行再審一審終審制。 -
They include the institution time, cause, subject, object, the competency of court of law and examination procedure, etc. however, there are great difference between the institu - tion of trial examination procedure and the institution of retrial procedure
其依新證據提起再審的有關制度，與西方國家的再審提起制度大致相當，有提起期限、事由、主體、客體、管轄法院、審查程序等。 -
These problems are as follows : the guidance principle is not in accordance with the regulation of civil procedure, too many improper subjects begin this procedure, it is difficult for the party to begin this procedure, the reasons for retrial are regulated too rigidly, the setting of administrative courts is not rational, there is no limitation to the number of times of retrial, the regulation for retrial period is too simple and there is no definite regulation for court costs and so on
該章分析了我國再審程序存在的主要問題：指導思想有失偏頗，再審程序啟動主體過多且不合理，當事人申請再審難以啟動再審程序，申請再審事由的規定過于原則，再審的管轄法院設置不合理，再審無次數限制，申請再審的期間規定過于簡單，再審的訴訟費用無明文規定等。 -
Besides the different subjects men - tioned above, there are other differences, such as limita - tion without institution deadline in trial supervision pro - cedure, compare the institution causes principle, simple trial procedure, formal trial usually, essential trial by law of court ( not like institution retrial on the basis of new evidence )
但其審判監督程序的提起，與依新證據提起再審程序的區別很大，主體不同前邊已講過，還有審判監督程序的提起無期限限制，提起事由規定得比較原則、審查程序很簡單，一般為形式審查，不象依新證據提起再審那樣，法院要進行實質審查。 -
So they are emotionally close to each other ; which will make the second instance court have prejudice and believe the first instance court easily ; iii ) the low tier of the last instance court will provide convenient condition for the botulism ; iv ) the higher tier courts back of the experience dealing with cases, it ' s hard for them to supervise and direct the lover courts ; v ) too many starting of the retrial procedures make the system of court of second instance being that of last instance exist in name only
其弊端主要表現在：一是作為主要終審法院的中級法院審判水平相對較低，難以矯正不公正的一審裁判；二是一、二審法院因地緣、業緣關系的親近易導致感情上的親近，從而導致終審法院先入為主地輕信一審法院的裁判；三是終審法院級別較低為地方保護主義的滋生提供了溫床；四是級別較高法院缺乏實際審判案件的經驗，難以對下級法院實行審判監督和業務指導。 -
Then i compare the concept, characteristic, subject, object, the conditions on which a case is brought to court for retrial and court procedure of retrial procedure in western countries with the popular trial supervision in china, distinguish their sameness and differences, declare that i will discuss and study the compare between china and foreign countries and the innova - tion orient of the retrial procedure institution subject system in the name of the more scientific retrial procedure
其次，對西方國家的再審程序與中國現行的審判監督程序，在概念、特徵、主體、客體、提起條件、審理程序等方面作以比較，區別其異同，陳明本文要以較科學的再審程序為名，來討論、研究再審程序提起主體制度的中外比較、改革方向。 -
This paper, by analyzing the advantages and disadvantages of " to deem a suspected crime as non - crime " and " to remand a case to the original court for a retrial ", proposes some suggestions on the reformation of the latter with the former as the guiding principle with the purpose of eliminating conflicts, maximizing the remedial function of the second instance in criminal cases, and protecting the legitimate rights and interests of the litigants
摘要通過對「疑罪從無」和「發回重審」的利弊分析，提出了以「疑罪從無」為原則改革「發回重審」制度的若干建議，旨在消除法律制度沖突，最大限度地發揮刑事二審程序的糾錯功能，維護當事人的合法權益。 -
Up to the present, the viewpoint to build retrial tells has become the trunk stream viewpoint of theory circle and judicial practical departments, and has been written among < < the people ' s court reformed the outline second 5 years > >
到目前為止，建立再審之訴的觀點已成為理論界與實務界的主流觀點，並被寫入了《人民法院第二個五年改革綱要》之中。 -
Under the guidance of these principles, the author suggest four points of reform : rebuild the mechanism of initiating the retrial process ; narrow the scope of the causes of action for retrial ; clarify and fix the time limit for the initiating of retrial ; in matter of procedure, jurisdiction should be given to court of upper level to review the case submitted for retrial, which should be final and under limitation of time and contents to be heard
借鑒國外的民事再審制度，結合我國的國情，在改造再審制度時，應當放棄對公正價值的片面追求，確定「當事人意思自治」和「依法糾錯」原則。重整民事再審的發動機制，確立再審之訴；規范啟動再審的理由；限定提起再審之訴的時間；確立以提審為原則的再審管轄制度，實行再審一次終局制，同時明確再審的審限。
分享友人