legal doctrines 中文意思是什麼
legal doctrines
解釋
法律原理-
Hobbes in his political and legal doctrines advocated a form of government which may be described as "enlightened absolutism. "
霍布斯在其政治、法律理論中提倡一種可以稱之為「開明專制主義」的政體。 -
The legal nature of the liability of warrant for defects has different doctrines in different developing courses, mains in legal responsibility and debt nonperformance
瑕疵擔保責任的法律性質，在其不同的發展過程中，產生過不同的學說，主要有法定責任說和債務不履行說。 -
Including five main doctrines and its limitation about the civil priority theoretically for the moment ; its five leading features are legal quality of priority, preference quality of priority, vouch quality of priority, hypotaxis quality of priority, impartibility quality of priority ; four situations which can perish the civil priority are preponderate over the time efficacity, naturally extinguished of priority ’ s objective, adhered creditor ’ s right died out, compelled alienation of priority ’ s objective ; enumerating the material provision on civil priority in our laws, and carrying through the brief conclude to the range of civil priority which combined some elements of common civil law
包括我國目前理論界對民事優先權概念的五種主要學說及其局限;民事優先權的五種主要特徵即優先權的法定性、優先性、擔保性、從屬性和不可分性;民事優先權的消滅的四種情形即超過時效、優先權標的物自然滅失、依附的債權消滅、優先權標的物的強制轉讓;列舉了我國法律中有關民事優先權的具體規定，並結合一般民法原理對民事優先權的順位進行了簡要歸納。 -
From then on, scholars ’ attentions shifted from how to apply the regulations to how to seek the proper applicable law for legal relationships. reese created “ the doctrine of most significant relationship ” with reference to the cases and doctrines existed
但這些原則是動態發展的，隨著國際社會政治、經濟、文化的發展，他們本身也在不斷地整合，因而呈現出一些新的發展趨勢。 -
The first part makes an exposition of the legal nature of ownership reservation. first the author makes on analysis the relevant doctrines after an explicit introduction of the doctrines, then he maintains that it is a kind of guaranty right specifically speaking, a kind of guaranty title
本文共分五個部分：文章第一部分闡述了所有權保留的性質，首先，對所有權保留的性質的學說分歧進行了簡要介紹，並分析這些學說，其次提出本文觀點，所有權保留的性質是一種權利擔保，具體而言，是一種物權擔保。 -
All the legal doctrines belong to two major batches according to their attitude toward legislation and law : one group is represented by legal positivism, the other include natural law, historical jurisprudence and sociological jurisprudence, etc. the former maintains that legislation equals to law and authority is the basis of law, while the latter believe that law is different from legislation
如果以是否區別制定法與法律作為判別標準，諸種法律學說就可以被劃分成兩個陣營：一方以實證主義法學為代表；另一方則包括自然法學、歷史法學和社會學法學等學說。前一派主張所謂法律就是制定法，立法者的權威是法律成立的根據。后一派則認為制定法之外，另有「法律」存在，制定法要以其為準據。 -
This thesis, from perspectives of past and present, theory and practice, comparatively analyzes the existing doctrines and legislative precedents in the continental and common legal family, with theme of comprehensively protecting the victim
本文以受害人利益的周全保護為主線索，採用比較研究的方法，從歷史和現實、理論和實踐等角度，縱橫結合，對大陸法系和英美法系之間的三種學說和五種立法例進行了對比分析。 -
This article gives an account of ecological tort. first of all, the author points out the basic definition, legal features of ecological tort and the distinguish between this tort and other kinds of torts and crimes. secondly, the author systematically explans the contractual liability principle and exception reason of ecological tort, thirdly, the author describes doctrines, types and manners of taking the responsibility of ecological tort in detail
本文論述了生態侵權的主要理論問題，具體提出了生態侵權的基本含義、法律特徵及其與其他形式的侵權、犯罪的區別，系統闡述了生態侵權的歸責原則和免責事由，詳細敘述了生態侵權的責任承擔規則、責任承擔種類和責任承擔方式。 -
Current doctrines related to it fall into tow categories : one is single governance structure which is based on shareholder ' s cost and individualism, but ca n ' t reflect the overall situation of company governance ; the other is multiple governance structure which is based on social cost and socialism, but is too ambiguous to be feasible. this article intends to reconstruct the concept of legal person " s property rights with the combination of enterprise property rights theories and enterprise contract theories. after expounding on the reasonability of the legal - person - property rights - based company governance form, it further analyzes the administrating rights of the providers of legal person " s property rights
主要分為兩種，一種是以股東成本和股東個人本位為基礎的單邊治理結構，這一觀點認為公司屬股東所有，公司的最終決定權應交付股東，由股東獨自構成公司治理的主體，其實質是認為公司生產經營的成本就是股東成本，這一觀點並不能反映公司治理的全貌；另一種是以社會成本和社會本位為基礎的多邊治理理論，這一觀點認為以利益相關者作為參與公司治理的主體，雖然就利益相關者的范圍又有各種不同的觀點，但總體上一般都包括股東、債權人、雇員、顧客等主體。
分享友人