問題正出在他身上 的英文怎麼說
中文拼音 [wèntízhēngchūzàitāshēnshàng]
問題正出在他身上
英文
it is he that made that mistake- 問 : Ⅰ動詞1 （請人解答） ask; inquire 2 （詢問; 慰問） question; ask about [after]; inquire about [aft...
- 題 : Ⅰ名詞1. （題目） subject; title; topic; problem 2. （姓氏） a surname Ⅱ動詞（寫上） inscribe; write
- 正 : 正名詞（正月） the first month of the lunar year; the first moon
- 身 : Ⅰ名詞1 （身體） body 2 （生命） life 3 （自己; 本身） oneself; personally 4 （人的品格和修養） on...
- 上 : 上名詞[語言學] （指上聲） falling-rising tone
- 問題 : 1 （需回答的題目） question; problem 2 （需研究解決的矛盾等） problem; matter 3 （事故或意外） tr...
-
In this essay i argue that the writing of american jazz age novelist f. scott fitzgerald responds to the developing national culture of his time, here described as an evolving relation between the marginality of the region and the hegemony of the center. like many of the characters in his novels, fitzgerald ' s perceived liminality from nation and canon - his work did not achieve repute until after his death - produced, paradoxically, dependence on those values the writer felt most distant from. to a far greater extent than hemingway, fitzgerald fictionalized the commodity culture of the american center which he, in time, came to reject in favor of a moral posture. fitzgerald ' s migration from the perceived margins of american literary discourse to status as a posthumous, centered canonical figure has three specific dimensions - the geographical, the canonical, and the moral - all of which combine to produce a significant ambivalence, beyond " modernist " credentials, in his life and legacy
本文認為，美國爵士時代的小說家菲茨傑拉德的作品對于作者所處時代和處于發展之中的民族文化（即區域邊緣與國家霸權之間的演進關系）作出了回應.正如其小說中的許多人物一樣，菲茨傑拉德從國家和典律中感知到閾限性（他自己的作品直到死後才獲得盛譽） ，這使得他依賴于自己認為是最為邊遠的價值觀念.與海明威相比較，菲茨傑拉德在更大程度上將位於美國中心的商品文化小說化，而最終他又出於道德考量將它予以拒絕.菲茨傑拉德從明顯的美國文學話語邊緣向去世之後被經典化的中心地位的漂移表現在地理、典律、道德三個方面.三者交織，使得學界關於他的紛爭超越了現代主義者身份問題，在關於他的人生和文學遺產問題上也是褒貶不一，眾說紛紜To realize this great selfish ambition, cultural and educational elite drastically criticized xikun scholars who held important political and educational positions but advocated poetic pursuit to escape from political dangers, and posed many models of educational discursive practice to control, better, and cultivate the full - of - desire societal life being neglected and thrown out of the academic sight by xikun school : firstly, in the early period, fan zhongyan and his followers, sun fu, and shi jie, et al., believed that confucian principles could be used to reform political, and educational institutions and improve society ; secondly, after fan, wanganshi, being treated as cultural rebel by other traditional moralists and politic competitors, did a failure of national wide educational and political reforms to cultivate financial talents, based on his coarse economics knowledge about how to enrich the central government ; thirdly, ou yangxiu and su shi focused attention on reform the highly rigidified literature and art education system at that time according to their cultural ideal that everybody has the right to express what his daily life, emotions and dreams, which could be seen as an irony by the fact that only themselves " life and feeling could enter into their literature and art education kingdom, while those who described lowly people " s experience, such as liu yong " s sentimental assays written specially for female performers and even the prostitutes, had to suffer from exclusion
但是，在十一世紀的文教空間中，真正值得考古學注意的知識是由理學家發明的，這不光因為，正是理學（而不是范學、王學、蘇學等這些在當時權力更大的知識）日後成了支配中國文教社會生活的權力，更是由於在十一世紀的文教界，只有理學家從一種最抽象的視角，認為十一世紀喧囂混亂的世俗生活及其基本的教化問題，無論多麼復雜，都可以歸結為人身上的理性與慾望之間的斗爭。就「哲學」能力而言，在渴望成聖、平天下的文教精英當中，理學家無疑是最出色的，他們能夠想到從「人」的結構出發，來認識世間紛繁復雜的現象，因而只需靜坐一處沉思人本身的秘密，而不必象王安石等人那樣認為到各地去調查，才可以摸清世間的狀況與問題。尤其不可思儀的是，他們的知識竟來源於看上去對教化世俗並不感興趣、只想追求長生不老的道士。It is he that made that mistake.
問題正出在他身上。
分享友人