正式上訴 的英文怎麼說

中文拼音 [zhēngshìshàngsù]
正式上訴 英文
full appeals
  • 正 : 正名詞（正月） the first month of the lunar year; the first moon
  • 式 : 名詞1 （樣式） type; style 2 （格式） pattern; form 3 （儀式; 典禮） ceremony; ritual 4 （自然科...
  • 上 : 上名詞[語言學] （指上聲） falling-rising tone
  • 訴 : 動詞1. （說給人） tell; relate; inform 2. （傾吐） complain; accuse 3. （控告） appeal to; resort to
  • 正式 : formal; official; regular
  1. China revised the law of criminal procedure in 1996, which processed a little big reformation to the original criminal procedure system by absorbing and borrowing some effective procedures of the law system of the great britain and the usa. on the aspect of criminal justice, the justice method is from the original way of interrogation that is dominated by judge, to the present counterplot system that is dominated by both accusing party and accused party on lawcourt. this kind of inquire method on the lawcourt shall be more beneficial to protect the right of accused party and has the promoting function to realize the fair of justice

    我國1996年修訂的《刑事訴訟法》 ，對原來的刑事訴訟制度進行了較大的改革，在某些方面借鑒和吸收了英美法系國家有益的做法，表現在刑事審判方式上，就是從以前由法官主導的審問制向由控辯雙方主導的對抗制進行轉變，對抗制的庭審方式應該更加有利於保障被告人的訴訟權利，對實現司法公正起到促進作用。
  2. The current public prosecution mode in our country took shape from the past whole case - examine mode in the base of the thinking to get ride of the drawbacks in the past. in practice, it has not only become effective and cause out a lot of new defaults, for example, the definition of the main evidence is not clear, the transfer range of the case files is unclear and the stipulate of the examine consequence is not enough. in order to reform and perfect the current public prosecution mode, we should regard the theory of the public prosecution as guide, combine our country ' s conditions, on methodology jump out of the circle relatively drawing lessons from the past, on the procedural theory, change the idea that the forejudge caused from the substantive examination and clarify the objective fact the current public prosecution include the essential substantive examination, in practice regard legitimacy, rationality and flexibility as the principle of law enforcement before the law to revise, in legislation define the concept of the main evidence clearly, add the regulation to dispatch the examine judge and the trial judge, regulate the treatment methods after examination and revise some rules about the summary procedure

    以公訴審查制度的訴訟理念為指導，結合我國的國情，對現行公訴審查模式的改革和完善，在方法論上跳出以往比較借鑒的圈子；在訴訟理念上改變過去庭審法官預斷必然緣于實體性審查的觀念，以澄清現行公訴審查模式包括必要的實體審的客觀事實；在實踐中以合法性、合理性和靈活性作為立法修改前的執法原則；在立法上明確界定主要證據的范圍是對證明犯罪是否成立起主要作用或有重要影響的證據，其中既包括有罪證據也包括無罪證據，增加規定公訴審查法官與正式庭審法官分立制度，補充規定對公訴審查后開庭審理之外的其它情況的處理方法以及對於人民法院在審理過程中發現不宜適用簡易程序的，取消原刑訴法應當按照一般公訴案件適用的普通審判程序重新審理的規定，改為由審理該案件的獨任審判員以外的審判員重新組成合議庭對該案件進行重新審理等。
  3. With the ways of our countrys criminal litigation court trials changing from inquisitorial proceedings to adversary procedures and the progressing of the criminal jurisdiction reformation, discovery is becoming an unavoidable issue in criminal litigation in our country. in practice, many jurisdictional authorities in our country have tried to explore and try it since 1999. this article, through comparing the discovery system among britain, america and japan, through analyzing the present actual situation of our countrys criminal litigation and from the aspects of the litigation modes, jurisdiction justice and the necessity for deepening the reformation of criminal trials, has proved that it is necessary and emergent in practice and applicable in theory to establish the discovery regime in our country

    隨著我國刑事訴訟法庭審判方式由審問制向對抗制的轉變和刑事審判方式改革的進一步深化，證據展示便成為刑事訴訟中的一個不可迴避的問題，實踐中不少司法機關從1999年始即已進行了證據展示的探索和嘗試，本文從英美日國家的證據展示制度的規定和比較入手，通過對我國刑事訴訟運作現狀的分析，從刑事訴訟模式、訴訟公正價值觀和深化刑事審判方式改革的角度，論證了證據展示制度在我國的建立具有現實上的必要性、緊迫性和理論上的合理性，並在此基礎上對證據展示的主體、責任、內容作了理論上的探討研究。
  4. After maxillary protraction and mandibular retraction with occipito - mental anchorage ( oma ) appliance on first stage, the patient was successfully treated with fixed orthodontic appliance with modified multiple loop edgewise archwire ( meaw ) and asymmetric elastics

    本病例報告為一12歲女孩，主訴下顎前突及偏斜，經第一階段以功能性顎骨矯正將上顎拉出及抑制下顎骨生長；第二階段使用全口固定式矯正裝置，以改良式meaw在3 ~ 4個月內改善齒列正中線，以及修正偏斜的下顎。
  5. Chapter iv introduces the common doctrine that there is not a de jure stare decisis in the dsm according to the text of the wto, the viewpoint of appellate body and the allegation of some scholars, and then questions the reasons by which of the common doctrine excludes the system of stare decisis. this chapter continues to examine the practice of wto adjudic

    第四章首先根據wto的約文、上訴機構的觀點和學者們的主張，闡述了在wto爭端解決中不存在法律上先例制度的通說，並對學說上主張wto排斥先例制度的理由提出質疑，進而通過考察wto爭端解決實踐，得出了wto爭端解決中存在事實上遵循先例的結論，並進一步探討了在wto爭端解決中確立正式先例制度的意義和必要性以及諸先例之間的位階關系等問題。
  6. The implementation of this system for more man ten years clearly shows that the multi - channel institution of retrial does not produce the desired effects. the present retrial system modelled itself mainly on that of the former soviet union, its operation in china gives rise to more state intervention than individual disposal, more layman recognised truth than truth recognised by law, seeking justice in substantial law more than legal procedure, and finally brings about " numerous applicants, unlimited lapse of time, high frequency, confused jurisdiction, unmethodical causes of action "

    現行民訴法實施十多年的司法實踐表明發動再審程序主體的多元性並沒有產生預期的效果，由於現行的民事再審主要是參照前蘇聯模式，在再審程序的啟動上，強調國家干預權，忽視當事人處分權；在事實認定上，追求客觀真實，忽視法律真實；在糾錯上，注重實體公正，忽視程序公正；從而導致在實際操作中出現了啟動再審的「主體無限、時間無限、次數無限、審級無限、理由或條件無限」的不良現象。
  7. Subject to the right of appeal under paragraphs 52 and 53 which shall be pursued if available, any person who is aggrieved by a decision of the discrimination complaints committee under paragraph 52 or 53 or by a decision of the vice - chancellor under paragraph 26 or 53 may seek redress through the university s formal grievance procedure

    如因歧視投訴委員會根據第五十二或五十三段作出的決定，或校長根據第二十六或五十三段2款作出的決定而感到受屈，可循大學正式的申訴程序要求上訴。
  8. Usually there is a certain interval between the investigating & prosecuting apparatus instituting a proceeding and the court formally holding a hearing in public prosecution case. during the interval the judge will conduct a series of judicial action, that is to examine the complaint case to decide if it is necessary to open a hearing and also make procedural preparation for the hearing, this procedure is called pre - court examination procedure of public prosecution case

    公訴案件從檢察機關提起公訴到法院正式開庭審判之間，通常有一定時間間隔，在此期間，法官一般要進行一系列訴訟活動，主要是對起訴案件進行審查，決定是否開庭審判及為開庭審判做程序上的準備，這種程序，稱為公訴案件的庭前審查程序。
  9. Upon launching the official appeal, you will be informed in writing of the time and date for the car to be re - examined by a government motor vehicle examiner at a government vehicle examination centre

    上訴正式提出后，你將會接獲書面通知約定日期及時間，由政府汽車檢驗主任在政府車輛檢驗中心重驗車輛。
  10. All appeals are heard in camera, but official publication of the hearings may be made in such a manner that the identity of the appellant is not disclosed

    所有上訴均閉門聆訊，但亦可以不透露上訴人身分的方式正式公布聆訊結果。
  11. I wish to formally appeal against my present terminated status

    我希望正式上訴我現在的學業中止狀況。
  12. It heard its first application for leave to appeal in september 1997 and its first substantive appeal in december 1997

    該法院於一九九七年九月審理首宗上訴許可的申請，並於一九九七年十二月審理首宗正式上訴案件。
  13. Directors of dltp includes de jure directors, de facto directors and shadow directors and third parties is composed of shareholders, creditors and some special creditors, such as governmental tr. x agencies, social security departments and corporate employees. the legal nature of dltp is special liability and different from liabilities mder tort, accordingly directors have to face both the liabilities under civil law and the special liabilities under corporate law. a director is not liable to third parties except that his or her action is illegal ; he or she is guilty of wrongful intent or of gross negligence for the illegal action ; the action occurs in the course of performing his or her corporate suties ; and third parties are damaged by the action

    作者指出，董事對第三人責任中的董事不僅指正式董事，而且還包括影子董事和事實董事;除了股東和一般債權人之外，第三人還包括二些特殊債權人，如稅務機關、社保機關以及雇員等;其責任性質為法定責任，但並不排除與民法侵權責任競合的可能;董事對第三人責任應包括以下要件: .董事之行為須違法、董事對其行為違法有故意或重大過失、董事之行為發生於執行職務過程中、第三人因董事之違法行為受損害;在舉證責任的分擔上應有董事證明其違法行為是否有故意或重大過失，實現這一制度的訴訟形式為第三人之訴;另外，在公司破產時應採取一些特殊措施，以保證公平受償。
  14. A latin american journalist at a briefing on the president ' s trip to the region this week told bush he wanted to ask the " unofficial " question that he asks all presidents - what does he carry in his pockets ? bush magnanimously answered by pulling out a white handkerchief with a flourish and then rummaged around in both pockets

    據路透社11月2日報道，在日前舉行的一次以布希即將于本周展開的拉美之行為主題的小型記者招待會上，一位來自拉美地區的記者告訴布希，自己想問一個「非正式」問題你的衣服口袋裡究竟裝了些什麼？
  15. True story : former newton palmtop chief sandy benett told his underlings that the subsidiary would be folded back into apple - before jobs had made an official announcement. after the news leaked, jobs fired benett. financial reward : his apple rewards are minimal - a salary of one dollar a year so that his family is eligible for the

    真實故事：前任牛頓newton掌上電腦的負責人莎迪o伯耐特sandy benett曾告訴他的手下人說，其子公司將被併入apple公司-此事發生在喬伯斯尚未就此發表正式聲明之前。
  16. He told me the party saturday night was formal, so i wore a suit and tie

    他告訴我星期六晚上的聚會是很正式的，所以我就穿上了西裝，戴上了領帶。
  17. Several regulations about the rules of evidence in civil litigation ( hereinafter referred to as several regulations ), being enforced from april 1, 2002, established timely disclosure of proof in the judiciary practices in china, which paves way for the reform of trial patterns and improvement of procedural efficiency

    我國在不斷探索民事審判方式改革的過程中，以2002年4月1日正式實施的最高人民法院《關於民事訴訟證據的若干規定》 （以下簡稱《證據規定》 ）為標志，從而用司法解釋的方式在我國司法實務中實際上確立了「證據適時提出主義」 ，這對于總結司法實踐經驗，改革審判方式，提高訴訟效率有著重要意義。
  18. So far, the court has heard 27 applications for leave to appeal and four substantive appeals

    迄今法院已聆訊了27宗上訴許可的申請和四宗正式的上訴案件。
  19. If you are still not satisfied, you may make an official appeal and complete an appeal application form ve17, submit it to the centre and pay an appeal fee which is the same as the first

    假如仍然感到不滿，可正式提出上訴，在車輛駛離中心前，將填妥的上訴申請表格（表格第ve17號）交給該中心，並繳付上訴費用，款額與
  20. If you are still not satisfied, you may make an official appeal and complete an appeal application ( form ve17 ), submit it to the centre and pay an appeal fee which is the same as the first

    假如仍然感到不滿，可正式提出上訴，在車輛駛離中心前，將填妥的上訴申請表格（表格第ve17號）交給該中心，並繳付上訴費用，款額與
分享友人
分享到 Line

分享到臉書