證據法學 的英文怎麼說

中文拼音 [zhèngjùfǎxué]
證據法學 英文
law of evidence
  • 證 : Ⅰ動詞（證明） prove; verify; demonstrate Ⅱ名詞1 （證據） evidence; proof; testimony; witness 2 （...
  • 據 : 據Ⅰ動詞1 （占據） occupy; seize 2 （憑借; 依靠） rely on; depend on Ⅱ介詞（按照; 依據） according...
  • 法 : Ⅰ名詞1 （由國家制定或認可的行為規則的總稱） law 2 （方法; 方式） way; method; mode; means 3 （標...
  • 學 : Ⅰ動詞1 （學習） study; learn 2 （模仿） imitate; mimic Ⅱ名詞1 （學問） learning; knowledge 2 （學...
  • 證據 : evidence; proof; testimony
  • 法學 : law; the science of law; jurisprudence法學博士 doctor of laws; 法學概論 general jurisprudence; 法...
  1. In china, under the influence of legal tradition and continental legal system, the evidence system pays more attention to substantive law rather than adjective law. in addition to the unscientific setting of the testimony standard, this evidence system influence the effect and quality of our country " s criminal trial

    在我國，由於受傳統法律思想和大陸法系證據制度的影響，重實體輕程序的審判思想積重難返，加之證明標準設置缺乏科學性，嚴重影響了我國刑事審判的效率和質量。
  2. New arguments about the object of criminal law

    試述證據法學的研究對象和研究方法
  3. This text begins with analysis that our country appraises the confusion of the system at present in real example, exposing ontology question of the scientific knowledge in terms of philosophy of science, regarding this as the platform, the text has analysed the concept of the scientific evidence, procedure function of the scientific evidence, studied the value of the scientific evidence, put forward standard that scientific evidence can adopt should be : the scientific knowledge of the basis has validity, relevancy with the factum probanda the method and conclusion have reliability

    本文以法官如何審查認定科學證據，限制專家話語權擴張對糾紛解決機制的侵襲為立論平臺，從實證分析我國目前鑒定體制的混亂切入，從科學哲學的角度闡述了科學知識的本體論問題，以此為平臺，分析了科學證據的概念、科學證據的程序功能，研究了科學證據的價值，提出科學證據可採的標準應當是：依據的科學知識具有有效性，與待證事實具有相關性，方法和結論具有可靠性。
  4. In the 2003 criminal procedure law amendment, medical literatures and cpgs are considered as exceptions of hearsay rules and can be used as evidence in the courts

    而隨著刑事訴訟結構引進了傳聞法則及其例外的規定，將學術著作及論文認定為傳聞證據的例外。
  5. Rb - sr whole rock - minerals ages determination indicates that the isochronal ages are 25018 ma and 213. 09. 8 ma for suhaitu and wenduerhao intrusion, respectively. the dated isotopic ages demonstrate that the alxa alkaline - rich intrusive rocks belong to indosinian alkaline magma activity. the similarities and differences of the alkaline - rich intrusive rocks distributed in the alxa fault block and those distributed along the northern margin of the north china block and the tarim block are compared and discussed

    採用rb - sr法對阿拉善斷塊有代表性的蘇亥圖溫都爾浩富堿侵入巖體的年進行了測定，分別獲得25018 ma和213 . 09 . 8 ma的年值，提供了屬于印支期的年代學證據，認為阿拉善斷塊北緣富堿侵入巖和華北斷塊北緣燕遼陰山印支期富堿性侵入巖帶應該劃歸同一印支期富堿性侵入巖帶。
  6. It is true that dusk ' s classics and plebeians ' jocosity has some correct statements, but there arc many pails running counter to the academic principles, for instance, making sweeping criticisms, self - contradiction, inadequate evidence, spontaneous remarks, random criticism, and fallacious reasoning

    摘要盡管《經典的黃昏與庶民的戲謔》中也有一些正確的說法，但從總的情況看，卻存在著諸多背離學理的地方或以偏概全，或自相矛盾，或不符事實，或證據不足，或任性發揮，或隨意指摘，或強詞奪理。
  7. But the entire range of studies, taken as a whole, has convinced most social scientists that there is a link. " the evidence is overwhelming, " said jeffrey mcintyre, legislative and federal affairs officer for the american psychological association

    美國心理學協會負責立法和聯邦事務的傑夫瑞麥因泰爾就表示證據太明顯了，反駁這種關聯，就好像反駁地心引力一樣。
  8. The next chapter gives detailed analysis and discussion on the legal status of consignee when bill of lading is issued or is not. there exist seven theories to explain the legal basis on which the consignee takes rights and responsibilities. by analysis and comparision, the author comes to the conclusion that when transferrable bill is issued, the theory of " security relationship " can better explain the origin of consignee ' s rights, while he takes the responsibilities according to direct stipulations of law

    接下來，分別對提單、電子提單和海運單項下的收貨人的法律地位進行了具體論述，著重分析了目前存在的各種學說的成功與不足之處，以及收貨人享有權利和承擔義務的法理依據，得出結論認為在簽發提單和電子提單的情況下，證券關系說可以作為收貨人享有權利的法律依據，法律規定說可以作為收貨人承擔義務的法理依據的結論。
  9. It was the first trial to employ the newly equipped migration data acquisition and analysis system for the scanning entomological radar and, a twin light - trap developed in china for, systematic long - term observations of migration of the beet armyworm spodoptera exigua, beet webworm loxostege sticticalis and cotton bollworm helicoverpa armigera in northern china the study provided direct evidence for the migration of 5 ". exigua in china, many parameters of migratory behaviour of the three species of insects, a better understanding of the relationship between migratory behaviour and wind or temperature field. the results enriched the theory of migration and provided new scientific knowledge for pest management in china

    本研究初步闡明了我國華北地區空中昆蟲群落結構，首次使用我國自行研製的掃描昆蟲雷達的數字化數據採集及分析系統，及價廉、高效的姊妹燈誘蟲法對華北地區甜菜夜蛾spodopteraexigua 、草地螟loxostegesticticalis和棉鈴蟲helicoverpaarmigera的遷飛進行了長期系統地觀測，得到了甜菜夜蛾在我國北方遷飛的直接證據，三種害蟲遷飛行為的若干參數，認識了昆蟲遷飛行為與風溫場的關系，豐富了昆蟲遷飛理論，為我國害蟲的治理提供了科學依據。
  10. On the basis of above - mentioned analysis, this article has studied the discovery system about its subject, liabilities and content in theory. meanwhile considering the actual situation of criminal litigation in our coun try, with reference to the scientific and reasonable elements of overseas adversary systems, the article has constituted and designed a complete discovery system, including the time, place, measures, methods of discovery, the limitation, exception, the examination of disputes and the legal effect of breach of discovery system

    同時，本文結合我國刑事訴訟的特點和司法現狀，在借鑒、吸收國外當事人主義證據展示制度中科學、合理的要素基礎上，對我國證據展示的程序，包括展示的時間、地點、方法、方式，限制、例外、爭議的審查及違反證據展示制度的法律後果等作了較為全面的構建和設計。
  11. It is not many scholars to clearly prove the opinion of shifting the burden of proof, on the contrary the contradictory scholars are more prominent, for example the vice professor of southwest politics and law university, chengang, wuyue who translates and introduces the burden of proof of germany, because them there are more and more people support the opposite opinion, while in the draft of " civil evidence code ", the traditional idea win, in this draft the legislator abides by the present justice and our country ' s native circumstance, they made an scientific choice, of course, the burden of proof will directly influence the party " s possibility of losing the lawsuit, while the regulation of shifting the burden of proof increases the plaintiff ' s opportunity to win a lawsuit. to explain what is the shifting of burden of proof, the paper use the civil law as the example to point out the " reverse " is not entirly relieve the plaintiff s obligation of producing evidence, but in certain extent and in certain range make the defendant bear the burden of producing those proofs from the reverse way, which are originally beard by the plaintiff. in the three proceeding law, shifting the burden of proof have some differences, but the interior spirits are coincident - for the values of social justice and the legal reason

    論證舉證責任倒置的學者觀點明確並且論證十分充分的不多，相反卻是對此著書立說予以反駁的學者較為突出，如西南政法大學的副教授陳則博士，翻譯並介紹德國證明責任學說的吳越先生均是目前國內對舉證責任倒置持否定態度的代表人物，由於他們的推動使得國內持此說的人越來越多，但在《民事證據法（草案） 》的擬定過程中，並未采責任倒置的地位，這樣的立法選擇是建立在對我國法律實現的本土環境客觀認識的基礎上的科學選擇，誠然，舉證責任的分配直接影響到當事人在訴訟中的敗訴風險，而「倒置」規則的設計，則在此問題上增加了原告勝訴的籌碼，在理解何為舉證責任倒置時，本文著重以民事法為主線，指出這種「倒置」並非全部免除原告的證明責任，而是在一定范圍與一定程度上將通常應由原告負擔的舉證責任轉由被告從反方面承擔，舉證責任倒置在三大訴訟法中所體現的具體情形有所差異，但它們的內在精神是一致的?法律的理性與社會公平價值，在民事訴訟中舉證責任倒置的情形，一般總是將其局限於特殊侵權情形，而忽略了民事合同違約責任的訴訟中的原告也無須對被告應承擔違約責任的所有要件，對被告主觀上的過錯實行推定，若被告予以否定則應對其無過錯的證據舉證，在設置舉證責任倒置的規則時，從各國的立法經驗與法的內在價值要求可以總結出以下幾個原則:程序法與實體法結合原則，公平原則，訴訟經濟原則，保護弱者原則等，基於此完善舉證責任倒置的規則時首先應肯定舉證責任倒置的概念，其次立法應避免求大求全，再次要配合實體法的發展，最後還可以在司法領域嘗試判例的指導意義。
  12. Though criminal standard of proof is hotly debated in the law of evidence, its viewpoint is diversified, especially in the standard of proof of present public prosecution and guilt decision

    雖然，刑事證明標準在當前證據法學研究中較為熱烈，但是，觀點紛紜，分歧明顯，尤其是在刑事訴訟過程中對提起公訴的證明標準應否與有罪判決的證明標準要求一致方面討論得尤為激烈。
  13. Electronic evidence is a new research issue of evidence law

    電子證據是我國證據法學研究中一個較新的課題。
  14. The definition and property of evidence is the basis and starting point of evidence theoretical research, and they are widely used in every kind of litigation activities

    證據的概念與屬性是證據法學的基本問題，對於何謂「證據」 ，我國訴訟法學者的認識不一。
  15. The issue what facts the litigants should produce evidence to prove is often studied from the perspective of object of proof

    在證據法學中，人們往往熱衷於從證明對象的角度來把握哪些事實應該由當事人承擔證明責任，而鮮有從司法認知的角度來把握證明責任的承擔。
  16. So, going into electronic evidence seriously not only gives theoretical assist, but also extends the new study field of the evidence, which shows great theoretical and practical values

    因而，我們對電子證據進行研究，不僅為立法機關、司法機關提供了理論支持，而且拓展了我國證據法學研究領域，具有重大的理論意義和實踐價值。
  17. The competence or admissibility of the evidence is the most important part in evidence law field. it is the criterion that must be satisfied before the evidence comes to the court and demonstrates the judicial nature of evidence in litigation, which makes it become the core of evidence law

    證據能力是證據法學領域的一個重要范疇，它是法律對訴訟外證據進入訴訟程序成為訴訟證據的一個最低限度的要求，體現了訴訟證據的法律特徵，是訴訟法對證據問題進行規范的核心內容。
  18. " the theory of legal facts " which has assimilated rationality of testimonology of western nations and their institutions, from the subjective process of lawsuit cognition, find a new research perspective and domain. however, it aggrandizes its relativity of cognition, neglect its absoluteness ; it emphasizes axiology and neglect the dialectical unification of axiology and epistemology

    「法律真實說」汲取西方國家訴訟證據法學理論和制度的合理性，從訴訟認識的主觀過程，為訴訟證明標準的研究洞開了新的視域，但誇大了認識的相對性，忽視了認識的絕對性；強調價值論，忽視了認識論與價值論的辯證統一。
  19. The article rests on the examples, precedents and written law via internet ; consults many essays about electronic evidence from domestic and overseas ; draws on the experience of the evidence and information subject ; compares the law, regulations and theory of most of the world ; analyses two important questions : the admissibility and the weight of electroniq evidence ; discusses the way of gathering and operating electronic evidence

    文章基於國內外有關電子證據的案例、通過因特網下載的相關立法、司法解釋；參考了國內外有關電子證據方面的論著資料；借鑒了證據法學、信息工程學等學科的理論和方法；比較了世界主要國家在電子證據方面的立法、判例、司法解釋和學說；分析了電子證據可采性和證明力兩個基本問題；探討了電子證據的收集和運用規則。
  20. Shifting the burden of proof of is the special provision and exception of the principle of burden of proof, during drafting " civil evidence code ", divergences about how to regulate the burden of proof appear, jurists have diffirent opinions on it, this paper set out from those divergences and disputes, discussing in detail with six sections : the disputes on the shifting the burden of proof, reasonable define the conception about shifting the burden of proof, the relation of shifting the burden of proof and deduction, shifting the burden of proof in present law and regulations, the function of shifting the burden of proof and the civil cases suitable for this regulation, legislative proposition. this artical elabrates the theoretical and realistic foundation of shifting the burden of proof. moreover, shifting the burden of proof is a phenomenon of proceeding and other regulations of solution to disputation, it is not confined to those laws and regulations of procedure, but also exist in substantial law

    舉證責任倒置是舉證責任分配規則中的特殊與例外，在民事證據法的草擬過程中對舉證責任倒置的存廢與否產生了分歧，法學界對此的觀點也呈現出百花齊放的態勢，本文從舉證責任倒置爭議與分歧的觀點出發，基於舉證責任倒置存在與否的爭議、舉證責任倒置概念的合理界定、舉證責任倒置與推定的關系、舉證責任倒置在我國現行法律中的體現、舉證責任倒置的功能及可適用民事案件的具體類型、舉證責任倒置立法完善的構想共六個部分具體闡述，從理論角度、司法實踐及立法構想三個不同的視角分析舉證責任倒置在我國的存在的理論意義、現實意義與立法前景，表明舉證責任倒置不僅在我國具有立法基礎而且有實踐環境，闡述舉證責任倒置雖然是出現于訴訟或是解決爭議的其他程序中的一個現象，但它又不局限於訴訟及其他解決爭議的程序規范，從現有的法律規范及法律實踐來看，舉證責任倒置與實體法是「同呼吸，共命運」的，用句老話說就是「皮之不存，毛將焉附? 」
分享友人
分享到 Line

分享到臉書