違反具結 的英文怎麼說
中文拼音 [wéifǎnjùjiē]
違反具結
英文
breach of recognizance-
This paper makes study on the problem, constructs a modal based on load offset, and then analyzes it, concludes that the modal has the limitary solutions, finally gives an example to show that it is effective and feasible
本文對此作了初步的探討，包括提出了一種基於違反量的模型，並對其進行了理論分析，得出該模型具有有界解的結論，最後利用浙江省電網的具體算例來說明該預測方法的可行性和有效性。It is not many scholars to clearly prove the opinion of shifting the burden of proof, on the contrary the contradictory scholars are more prominent, for example the vice professor of southwest politics and law university, chengang, wuyue who translates and introduces the burden of proof of germany, because them there are more and more people support the opposite opinion, while in the draft of " civil evidence code ", the traditional idea win, in this draft the legislator abides by the present justice and our country ' s native circumstance, they made an scientific choice, of course, the burden of proof will directly influence the party " s possibility of losing the lawsuit, while the regulation of shifting the burden of proof increases the plaintiff ' s opportunity to win a lawsuit. to explain what is the shifting of burden of proof, the paper use the civil law as the example to point out the " reverse " is not entirly relieve the plaintiff s obligation of producing evidence, but in certain extent and in certain range make the defendant bear the burden of producing those proofs from the reverse way, which are originally beard by the plaintiff. in the three proceeding law, shifting the burden of proof have some differences, but the interior spirits are coincident - for the values of social justice and the legal reason
論證舉證責任倒置的學者觀點明確並且論證十分充分的不多，相反卻是對此著書立說予以反駁的學者較為突出，如西南政法大學的副教授陳則博士，翻譯並介紹德國證明責任學說的吳越先生均是目前國內對舉證責任倒置持否定態度的代表人物，由於他們的推動使得國內持此說的人越來越多，但在《民事證據法（草案） 》的擬定過程中，並未采責任倒置的地位，這樣的立法選擇是建立在對我國法律實現的本土環境客觀認識的基礎上的科學選擇，誠然，舉證責任的分配直接影響到當事人在訴訟中的敗訴風險，而「倒置」規則的設計，則在此問題上增加了原告勝訴的籌碼，在理解何為舉證責任倒置時，本文著重以民事法為主線，指出這種「倒置」並非全部免除原告的證明責任，而是在一定范圍與一定程度上將通常應由原告負擔的舉證責任轉由被告從反方面承擔，舉證責任倒置在三大訴訟法中所體現的具體情形有所差異，但它們的內在精神是一致的?法律的理性與社會公平價值，在民事訴訟中舉證責任倒置的情形，一般總是將其局限於特殊侵權情形，而忽略了民事合同違約責任的訴訟中的原告也無須對被告應承擔違約責任的所有要件，對被告主觀上的過錯實行推定，若被告予以否定則應對其無過錯的證據舉證，在設置舉證責任倒置的規則時，從各國的立法經驗與法的內在價值要求可以總結出以下幾個原則:程序法與實體法結合原則，公平原則，訴訟經濟原則，保護弱者原則等，基於此完善舉證責任倒置的規則時首先應肯定舉證責任倒置的概念，其次立法應避免求大求全，再次要配合實體法的發展，最後還可以在司法領域嘗試判例的指導意義。Surveying the theories and practice all over the world, the countries such as german insist on contract responsibility according to providing contract by silent information and protecting the third party. however, america and england tend to infringement responsibility, because they think there is n ' t strict contract relations between accounting and the third party, and cpa against the liability stipulated in advance. the third party can be devided to the direct third party, the predicted third party and the third party which can be predicted reasonably
縱觀世界各國學說與實踐，德國等大陸法系國家一般主張為契約責任，這主要是以默示的信息提供契約，具保護第三人效力的契約，契約締結上的過失等理由為依據；而英美法系國家，判例和學說趨向降旗認定為一種侵權責任，因為會計師與第三人之間並無嚴格意義上的契約關系，雖然對注冊會計師而言，第三人具有合理的可被預見性，但第三人畢竟是不確定的多數人，因而會計師違反的是法律事先規定的義務，侵犯的是一般公民的權利，是絕對權，只能依侵權行為的責任構成追究責任。The aim of this article is to develop some effective studying on this point through the analysis of internal value of the displaying system of criminal evidence, and describes the active functions of it both on justice and efficiency as well as protection of the defence right of accused party. furthermore, the article compared different displaying systems of criminal evidence of the usa, great britain, japan, and italy to discuss the development rules of this system combing with the chinese present mixing litigation mode of original authority lawsuit method and the oppositional court inquiring method by both parties, which comparing and analyzing the rules of evidence - displaying both of original and present modes to list the problems existed in the present criminal evidence - displaying system. finally, the article brings forward some conceives of configuration and perfecting of chinese criminal evidence - displaying system from the selection of mode, scope, and judge function of criminal evidence - displaying and penalty measures to the deregulation of displaying of evidence etc
首先從分析刑事證據展示制度的內在價值入手，充分闡述其在實現公正與效率兼顧和保護被告人辯護權方面的積極作用；其次通過對美國、英國、日本和義大利的刑事證據展示制度的比較，來探析該制度的發展規律；再次結合我國的刑事訴訟從原來的職權主義訴訟模式轉變為現在兼有當事人主義有關規定的混合式訴訟模式，對前後兩種模式中具有證據展示性質的規定進行比較分析，說明現在刑事證據展示方面存在的諸多問題；最後從刑事證據展示的模式選擇、刑事證據展示的范圍、法官在證據展示中的作用、以及違反證據展示規則的制裁措施等幾個主要方面，對構建和完善我國的刑事證據展示制度提出了設想。In chapter three, 5 main classifications of language and 6 typical subjects of nqtmda are analyzed systematically and respectively from integer and item of the tests, which analyzes the results of english test result in emphasis and reflects the quality of tests from the point of view of quantification. also we analyze the status of candidate crowd and violating the exam discipline. chapter four constructs the statistic and analysis system of nqtmda, and demonstrates the integral architecture of the system, and the features of this application software are introduced
第三章通過實驗分析，以實際應用為目的，對2001 、 2002年度同等學力申請碩士學位全國統一考試中報考人數較多，涉及范圍較廣、較具典型性的五個外國語語種和六個一級學科分別進行了系統的抽樣統計分析，包括試卷整體分析和項目分析，重點對英語考試結果進行完整的統計分析，從量化的角度反映了試卷和浙江工業大學碩士學位論文試題的質量，並對考生的人群狀況，以及違紀情況作了統計與分析。分享友人