judicial difference 中文意思是什麼
judicial difference
解釋
法律上的差別- judicial : adj 1 司法的，審判上的。2 審判員的；法官的；法院的；法院判決的[規定的]。3 法官似的，符合法官身分...
- difference : n. 1. 差異，差別。2. 不和，爭論。3. 【數學】差，差額。4. 【邏輯學】特殊性。vt. 〈罕用語〉區別，使有差別。
-
The difference of litigation model between two families of law makes a distinction between expert witness and lay witness in the fields of service target, dispatch, impanel and nature standing in litigation ; the second chapter of article surveys the problems arising from expert system practice and actual application of expert witness in judicial practice, and demonstrates the existing condition and necessity of setting up expert witness in our country ; the third chapter of article builds up them in the regards of subject of expert witness, qualification, launch, impanel and adoption of expert ’ comments
而兩大法系訴訟模式的差異，使專家證人與鑒定人在服務對象、啟動和選任以及在訴訟中的性質地位上存在較大的區別;本文第二章考察我國鑒定製度在運行過程中產生的問題和專家證人在司法實踐中實際運用，論證我國確立專家證人存在的現實基礎和必要性;本文第三章，從專家證人的主體、資格、啟動和選任及專家意見的可采性等方面進行了構建。 -
According to domestic relevant essays and works on this crime, related discussions mainly concentrated on this crime ' s composition characteristic, the form of crime intention and its time of emerging, the asserting of the purpose of illegal possession, the distinction between contract swindling and civil disputation, etc. there is fewer discussions on the concept, the difference between swindling and fraud, the nature of the behavior that swindle intention produced while the effective contract is fulfilled, the evaluation and analysis of the clause of the crime, etc. the author studied related essays and works carefully, then combining the theory of the contract lav and criminal law, to discuss the concepts of this crime, the judicial confirmation of this crime, the evaluation and analysis of the clause of the crime, etc. aiming at casting a brick to attract a jade
從國內有關本罪研究的論文與專著來看，相關論述主要集中在本罪的構成特徵，犯罪故意的形式與產生時間，非法佔有目的的認定，合同詐騙與民事糾紛的區別等方面，而對本罪的概念，欺詐與詐騙的區別，在有效合同履行過程中產生犯意進而詐騙之行為如何定性，本罪條文評析等方面，尚探討不多。筆者在較詳盡地研讀有關論文、專著的基礎上，結合合同法理論與刑法理論，就合同詐騙罪的概念與特徵、司法認定、條文評析等方面展開論述，旨在拋磚引玉。 -
Part three, some questions on judicial judgment of robbery : firstly, examines boundary between crime of robbery and non - crime in the following aspects : action purpose. action cause, action circumstance, action consequences ; secondly, analyses systematically difference between crime of robbery and. the concerned crime ; thirdly, discusses deep going the stipulation of 263 article of criminal code which is about transforming robbery ; at last, elaborates crime with aggravated circumstance as well as crime with aggravated consequences of robbery
第三部分，搶劫罪的司法認定的若干問題：首先從行為目的、行為起因、行為情節與危害程度等方面考察了搶劫罪與非罪的界限；其次系統分析了本罪與相關罪的區別；再次深入分析了刑法第269條關于轉化型搶劫罪的規定；最後詳細論述了搶劫罪的情節加重犯和結果加重犯問題。 -
In order to get a better understanding of the nature of arbitrators, this dissertation has then made a comparison in respect of the provisions on the qualification of arbitrations at home and abroad. targeting on the blind transplantation of judicial proceedings into arbitral proceedings by some arbitration institutions after the implementation of the arbitration law, this dissertation has compared and studied the difference between judges and arbitrators
為了準確地認識仲裁員的性質，本文就中外仲裁法律中關于仲裁員資格的規定作了制度比較，並從法理上對民商事訴訟主體即法官與仲裁員的主要區別作了比較分析，從而針對仲裁員的非職業性的特點和幾年來仲裁工作的實踐，就仲裁員應當具備什麼樣的資格條件作了探討。 -
On the other hand, due to their difference in system and practice of administration, news reporting and judicial act inevitably have certain degree of conflict, thus the questions of in what way media supervision interferes with judicial independence or promotes judicial justice and what judicial activities are not to be reported or supervised
然而，由於兩者各自所處的領域和各自特性的不同，在新聞與司法實踐中，又不可避免地產生了一定程度上的沖突和對立?什麼樣的新聞媒體監督干擾司法獨立，什麼樣的新聞媒體監督促進司法公正?什麼樣的司法活動又是新聞媒體所不能采訪報道與監督的呢 -
This new developing social phenomenon of fictitious property of the network, because there is difference in the academia and judicial circle understanding of its legal attribute, and then has caused the dispute applicable to law of the fictitious property case of the network
網路虛擬財產這一新興的社會現象，由於在學術界與司法界對其法律屬性的認識存在分歧，進而導致了針對網路虛擬財產個案的法律適用的爭議。 -
Though they have a lot in common such as user and function, thus they keep a very close relation in judicial practice, the judicial notice and inference also have many difference in connotation, method arid procedure and so on in their comparing horizon
在二者的比較視野中，它們雖然在使用主體、所發揮的功能方面有許多相同之處，而且在具體的司法實踐中也有較為密切的聯系，但在事實認定的具體內容、方法和程序等方面二者又有著顯著的區別。 -
Thirdly, the crime ' s determination judicial. it demonstrates the difference between crime and illegal act, and the difference between this and other crimes
就濫用職權罪的罪與非罪的界限，濫用職權罪與其它幾個易混淆的犯罪的區別進行了論述。 -
Secondly, it analyses the constitution of the crime of credit card fraud, as for the difference about culprit between legislation and judicial practice, we should take up amplified interpretation
其次，對信用卡詐騙罪構成理論作了具體分析。針對信用卡詐騙罪主體在立法與司法上的不統一。我們應從把握本質的角度出發，對其作出擴大解釋。 -
This article looks back the history overall of the government administration reform from our country ' s reform and open - door policy. it analyzes three challenges that our government faces after joining wto : challenge that government duty faces, challenge that government administration management faces, challenge that officialdom system faces. it has dig out the difference and conflict between wto rules ands our government duty, and further gives the corresponding countermeasure of our country ' s administrative management under the condition of joining wto : that is to change administration management notion, further change government duty, change government behavior method, perfect law, build a administration law system that is corresponded with the wto rules, create a new officialdom system, strengthen judicial investigation
本文簡要回顧了我國改革開放以來政府行政改革的歷史，分析了加入wto以後我國政府面臨的「三大挑戰」 ：政府職能面臨的挑戰，政府行政管理方式面臨的挑戰，公務員制度面臨的挑戰，探討了wto規則與我國政府職能的差異和沖突，進而提出了加入wto條件下我國行政改革的相應對策：即轉變行政管理觀念，進一步轉變政府職能，改革政府行為方式，完善立法、建立與wto規則相對應的行政法律體系，創新公務員制度，強化司法審查。 -
In fact, reconciliation during judicial proceedings in many foreign countries has no basic difference in comparison to our ' s
實際上，國外的訴訟和解和我國的法院調解並無本質上的區別。
分享友人