違法訴訟程序 的英文怎麼說

中文拼音 [wéifǎsùsòngchéngxù]
違法訴訟程序 英文
criminal proceeding
  • 違 : 動詞1. （不遵照; 不依從） disobey; defy; violate 2. （離別） part; leave; be separated
  • 法 : Ⅰ名詞1 （由國家制定或認可的行為規則的總稱） law 2 （方法; 方式） way; method; mode; means 3 （標...
  • 訴 : 動詞1. （說給人） tell; relate; inform 2. （傾吐） complain; accuse 3. （控告） appeal to; resort to
  • 訟 : 動詞1. （打官司） bring a case to court 2. （爭辯是非） dispute; argue
  • 程 : 名詞1 （規章; 法式） rule; regulation 2 （進度; 程序） order; procedure 3 （路途; 一段路） journe...
  • 違法 : break the law; be illegal
  • 訴訟 : [法律] lawsuit; litigation; legal action; judicial action; action
  • 程序 : 1 （進行次序） order; procedure; course; sequence; schedule; ground rule; routing process 2 [自動...
  1. In the civil actions, there exist two ways of retrials presented by she public right : decision of the court and the counterplea raised by the procuratorate, both of which are against she procedure value of the code of civil procedural law and therefore should be abolished

    摘要在民事訴訟中，法院決定再審和檢察院抗訴提起再審作為兩種運用公權力提起再審的方式與民事訴訟法的程序價值相違背，應當廢除。
  2. If the crime of unauthorized partition of state property is belonged to crimes committed by a unit, then, the arrangement for the criminal procedure ( whether the unit should be belonged to the defendant ) as well as how to resolve the filthy lucre and booty ( whether the retrieved filthy lucre and booty should be returned to the unit ) and so on, the operations for judicial practice are also puzzled

    如果將私分國有資產罪理解為單位犯罪，那麼，刑事訴訟程序的安排（是否將單位列作被告）以及贓款贓物的處理（是否將追繳的贓款贓物退還原國有單位）等司法實踐操作也將面臨困惑，這顯然與刑法規定單位犯罪的初衷即「方便有效地打擊單位的犯罪行為」相違背。
  3. Procedural defense is a new kind of modern defense. it does not refer to the substantial defense against the prosecution, nor does it refer to presenting evidence and reasons to prove the innocence of the accused, the pettiness of his crime and the need for a mitigated punishment or exemption from criminal responsibility. in fact, the procedural defense directly aims at the procedures of the special organs by pointing out and proving their procedural irregularities that may result in the exclusion of the prosecutive evidence, or even may result in the termination of the whole prosecution in the interests of the accused

    程序性辯護是現代刑事辯護的一種新的類型，它不是針對檢控方的控訴內容，也不是提出證據和理由證明被追訴人無罪、罪輕或者應當減輕、免除其刑事責任，它直接針對刑事訴訟專門機關的訴訟程序，希望通過指出和證明追訴機關程序違法而使對辯方不利的證據被排除，或者違法程序被宣告無效甚至整個追訴程序被依法終結，從而達到有利於被追訴人的目的。
  4. On the basis of above - mentioned analysis, this article has studied the discovery system about its subject, liabilities and content in theory. meanwhile considering the actual situation of criminal litigation in our coun try, with reference to the scientific and reasonable elements of overseas adversary systems, the article has constituted and designed a complete discovery system, including the time, place, measures, methods of discovery, the limitation, exception, the examination of disputes and the legal effect of breach of discovery system

    同時，本文結合我國刑事訴訟的特點和司法現狀，在借鑒、吸收國外當事人主義證據展示制度中科學、合理的要素基礎上，對我國證據展示的程序，包括展示的時間、地點、方法、方式，限制、例外、爭議的審查及違反證據展示制度的法律後果等作了較為全面的構建和設計。
  5. This part expounds the trial committee ' s : potential and shown defects in theory and practice from five aspects, the trial committee influences the judicial independence by main depriving judge ' s independent jurisdiction, to destruct the justice of the procedure, violate such as open trial, direct words, collegiate system, according etcs basic lawsuit principle, at the same time, as further deep demonstration, the author propose the trial committee cant ensured to realize justice too

    第五部分，審判委員會的缺陷，這一部分從五個方面詳細論述審判委員會制度潛在和表現出來的理論及實踐缺陷。作者認為，審判委員會以剝奪法官獨立審判權為核心影響了司法獨立，同時構成對程序正義的破壞，違背了諸如審判公開、直接言詞、合議制、迴避等基本訴訟原則。作為深一層的論證，作者也提出了審判委員會不能充分保障實質正義的實現。
  6. Article 169 if a people ' s procuratorate discovers that in handling a case a people ' s court has violated the litigation procedure prescribed by law, it shall have the power to suggest to the people ' s court that it should set it right

    第一百六十九條人民檢察院發現人民法院審理案件違反法律規定的訴訟程序，有權向人民法院提出糾正意見。
  7. Besides the object of the theory as an essential element to civil procedure, the theory is helpful to carry the procedure ideals through. the practical significance is the theory can establish a theoretical foundation for civil procedural lawmaking. invalidation of acts system in civil litigation system has been established in the civil countries to punish illegal acts, and in our country, it requires civil procedural law to explicitly prescribe the results of the invalidation on most occasions

    訴訟行為理論還有積極的實踐意義，它可以為訴訟立法提供深厚的理論基礎，訴訟行為的成立、有效要件完全可以為立法利用；訴訟行為無效制度是制裁程序違法最有效的措施，立法上明確劃定無效訴訟行為的范圍可以增強訴訟法的可操作性，遏製程序違法現象；研究訴訟行為還可以促進司法規范化和效率化。
  8. 4. retry takes place again and again. the principle of retry " respect facts and correct any mistakes " is seriously against the civil suit law

    4 、兩審終審制的外部救濟機制不協調一一『再審的無限擴張:我國再審程序「實事求是、有錯必糾」的指導思想嚴重違反了民事訴訟的司法規律
  9. There are provisions in other countrys that procuratorate can participate in civil procedural activitives that relate to public interests

    摘要我國《民事訴訟法》規定，檢察院可對法院認定事實錯誤、適用法律錯誤、違反法定程序以及審判人員的枉法裁判行為提出抗訴。
  10. Article 161 if any participant in the proceedings of a trial or bystander violates the order of the courtroom, the presiding judge shall warn him to desist

    第一百六十一條在法庭審判過程中，如果訴訟參與人或者旁聽人員違反法庭秩序，審判長應當警告制止。
  11. In the end of the article, i have studied the invalidation of acts, whose purpose is to punish illegal acts

    研究訴訟行為無效的目的，則是建立訴訟程序的違法制裁體系，從而增強訴訟法的可操作性。
  12. The administrative law circles of our country have made the following greater progress mainly in research of administering the state according to law : ( 1 ) have made several obvious achievements mainly in rules of organization of the administration and public servant law research, have offered t he theoretical foundation and practiced the scheme to the reform in government organization and formulation of civil servant ' s regulations of the eighties ; ( 2 ) break through pure management mode, propose administrative legal system principle, administrative supervision and supervise the administrative theory ; ( 3 ) strengthening the research of theory to supervision administrative theory, administrative legal liability and administration relieves the theory, to relevant administration ' s controlling, administrative reconsideration and administrative litigation system basic principle principle way, etc, have launched the deep discussion ; ( 4 ) research about the administrative liability for tort, encroach right and belonging to the responsibility principle, responsibility form, responsibility subject, bear responsibility way and as main administrative liability for tort administrative compensation research of issue of form, having made more achievements, " state compensation law " was just made out on this kind of sturdy and fruitful research foundation of the administrative law circles ; ( 5 ) the research field has expansion to a great extent

    我國行政法學界在依法行政的研究方面主要取得了如下較大進展： （ 1 ）在行政組織法和公務員法研究方面取得了若干明顯的成果，為80年代政府機構改革和公務員條例的制定提供了理論依據和實踐方案； （ 2 ）突破了純管理模式，提出了行政法制原則，行政監督和監督行政的理論； （ 3 ）加強了對監督行政理論、行政法律責任和行政救濟理論的研究，對有關行政監察、行政復議和行政訴訟制度的基本原理、原則、方式等，展開了深入的探討； （ 4 ）關於行政侵權責任的研究，在侵權歸責原則、責任構成、責任主體、承擔責任方式以及作為主要行政侵權責任形式的行政賠償問題的研究上，取得了較多成果， 《國家賠償法》正是在行政法學界的這種扎實且富有成效的研究基礎上制定出來的； （ 5 ）研究領域有了很大程度的拓展。主要研究領域包括行政法的基本理論，政府組織法、廉政建設、公務員法、行政立法、行政執法、行政司法、行政違法與行政責任、國家賠償、行政法制保障部門、行政管理法、行政救濟法、行政程序法等。
  13. It is not many scholars to clearly prove the opinion of shifting the burden of proof, on the contrary the contradictory scholars are more prominent, for example the vice professor of southwest politics and law university, chengang, wuyue who translates and introduces the burden of proof of germany, because them there are more and more people support the opposite opinion, while in the draft of " civil evidence code ", the traditional idea win, in this draft the legislator abides by the present justice and our country ' s native circumstance, they made an scientific choice, of course, the burden of proof will directly influence the party " s possibility of losing the lawsuit, while the regulation of shifting the burden of proof increases the plaintiff ' s opportunity to win a lawsuit. to explain what is the shifting of burden of proof, the paper use the civil law as the example to point out the " reverse " is not entirly relieve the plaintiff s obligation of producing evidence, but in certain extent and in certain range make the defendant bear the burden of producing those proofs from the reverse way, which are originally beard by the plaintiff. in the three proceeding law, shifting the burden of proof have some differences, but the interior spirits are coincident - for the values of social justice and the legal reason

    論證舉證責任倒置的學者觀點明確並且論證十分充分的不多，相反卻是對此著書立說予以反駁的學者較為突出，如西南政法大學的副教授陳則博士，翻譯並介紹德國證明責任學說的吳越先生均是目前國內對舉證責任倒置持否定態度的代表人物，由於他們的推動使得國內持此說的人越來越多，但在《民事證據法（草案） 》的擬定過程中，並未采責任倒置的地位，這樣的立法選擇是建立在對我國法律實現的本土環境客觀認識的基礎上的科學選擇，誠然，舉證責任的分配直接影響到當事人在訴訟中的敗訴風險，而「倒置」規則的設計，則在此問題上增加了原告勝訴的籌碼，在理解何為舉證責任倒置時，本文著重以民事法為主線，指出這種「倒置」並非全部免除原告的證明責任，而是在一定范圍與一定程度上將通常應由原告負擔的舉證責任轉由被告從反方面承擔，舉證責任倒置在三大訴訟法中所體現的具體情形有所差異，但它們的內在精神是一致的?法律的理性與社會公平價值，在民事訴訟中舉證責任倒置的情形，一般總是將其局限於特殊侵權情形，而忽略了民事合同違約責任的訴訟中的原告也無須對被告應承擔違約責任的所有要件，對被告主觀上的過錯實行推定，若被告予以否定則應對其無過錯的證據舉證，在設置舉證責任倒置的規則時，從各國的立法經驗與法的內在價值要求可以總結出以下幾個原則:程序法與實體法結合原則，公平原則，訴訟經濟原則，保護弱者原則等，基於此完善舉證責任倒置的規則時首先應肯定舉證責任倒置的概念，其次立法應避免求大求全，再次要配合實體法的發展，最後還可以在司法領域嘗試判例的指導意義。
  14. The illegal obtained evidence of civil cases is the evidence material that the civil cases party, agent, litem or some person who receives party to entrust or engages or instigates with the program breaks the law is gained

    民事訴訟非法證據是民事訴訟當事人、訴訟代理人或者受當事人委託、聘請、指使的人以程序違法的方式取得的證據材料。
  15. For a long time, the action mode of authority creed has been adopted in civil procedure, while the legislation and the theoretical circles do n ' t pay enough attention to the principle of good faith. compared to western countries, the existing system of civil procedure cannot effectively protect the right of action of the parties. although we do not have the tradition of the rule of law, our culture of

    訴訟法既保障當事人實質意義上的公正，也強調當事人人格尊嚴不受侵犯，實質公正和程序公正並重，因此，訴訟法上的歸責不以行為人給他人造成實際損害為要件，只要行為人實施了違反誠信義務的行為，且主觀上存在過錯，即應承擔違反誠信原則的法律後果。
  16. Otherwise it only has demonstrative political function ; a considerable number of those basic civil rights confirmed by the constitution cannot be actually fulfilled because they are not specified by the branch laws. as to the reason of this phenomenon, it is mainly due to the fact that there is no corresponding system of constitutional actions in our country so that those laws and behaviors which are against the constitution cannot be corrected and punished in time and the citizens " constitutional rights cannot be protected as a practical procedure

    長期以來，我國憲法的根本法地位，只是體現在作為制定法律的依據方面，除此之外，主要發揮的是宣示性的政治功能，憲法所確認的公民基本權利，相當一部分因未被部門法具體化而無法真正實現，究其原因，主要是由於我國缺乏相應的憲法訴訟制度，以至於違憲的法律和行為得不到及時的糾正和制裁，公民的憲法權利缺乏實現的程序性保障。
  17. The theory of negation insists that it is only a moral duty for the subjectivities of lawsuits to be in good faith, because the principle will seriously damage the debate principle and disposition principle of the civil procedural law. on the contrary, the theory of admitting regards the principle as a basic principle of private law, so that it shall dominate all jurisdictions and cannot be infringed by the parties for their own interests

    否定說認為訴訟主體遵守誠信應只是道德上的義務，該原則將會對民事訴訟法的辯論和處分原則產生極大破壞；肯定說則認為誠實信用原則作為私法領域的基本原則，應當支配一切法域，訴訟程序應不允許當事人為了自己的利益違背誠信原則。
  18. For the maintenance of the justice of procedure in the criminal reconnaissance, when criminal law is amended, procedural illegal actions should be checked by perfecting the legal system

    為了維護刑事偵查階段的程序正義，我國將來在修改刑事訴訟法時應當從完善法制的角度來遏制偵查階段的程序性違法行為。
  19. The theoretical basis of the establishment of the rules of investigative supervision is the need to guarantee the positive operation of the right of criminal investigation and realize the righteousness of judicature and the inherent value of criminal procedure

    確立偵查監督制度的理論依據是確保刑事偵查權的良性運作、實現司法公正和刑事訴訟程序內在價值的需要，而刑事偵查過程中違法行為的普遍存在則構成了確立偵查監督制度的實踐依據。
  20. Such circumstances show : it violates procedural justice of proceedings, it is not beneficial to the protection for substantive rights of parties, it violates the principle of equity of parties in civil proceedings, the parties " right of choice for procedures has been improperly limited, procedural efficiency is rather low due to the bad operability of legislative techniques

    具體表現在：既有違訴訟程序正義又不利於當事人實體權利的保護，違背了民事訴訟當事人地位平等的原則，當事人的程序選擇權受到不當限制，立法的可操作性差導致訴訟效率低下等。
分享友人
分享到 Line

分享到臉書