量刑原則 的英文怎麼說

中文拼音 [liángxíngyuán]
量刑原則 英文
sentencing principle
  • : 量動1. (度量) measure 2. (估量) estimate; size up
  • : Ⅰ形容詞1 (最初的; 原來的) primary; original; former 2 (沒有加工的) unprocessed; raw Ⅱ動詞(原...
  • : Ⅰ名詞1 (規范) standard; norm; criterion 2 (規則) regulation; rule; law 3 (姓氏) a surname Ⅱ...
  • 量刑 : [法律] measurement of penalty; 光量刑 light quantum量刑標準 criterion for imposing penalty; crite...
  1. Under special relationships of lapping of legal provisions, the rule that special law is superior to common law shall be strictly followed. only under special circumstances shall the harsher or less harsh provision apply ; as to subsidy relationships, primary law shall be applied rather than additional law ; as to absorption relationships, the law as a whole is superior to a part of the law. the author does n ' t support the principle that the harsher law is superior to the less harsh law

    針對特別關系的法條競合的適用應該嚴格依照特別法優于普通法的,例外的情況是當一個行為觸犯同一法律時,在特殊情況下可以選擇較重或較輕的法條定罪,以防止的畸輕或畸重;針對補助法條關系的法條競合,其適用應遵循基本法優于補充法的;吸收關系的法條競合的處理,其適用是整體法優于部分法。
  2. First, the author thinks that the ci should not be negated completely because its exis - tance has reasonableness in theory and applicableness in practice ; second, the author thinks that the ci is neither a criminal fundamental principle, nor only a sentence principle, but a criminal application principle guiding the sentence and execution of penalty ; third, on the basis of clear answer to the preceding problems, the author makes a demonstration of the relation between the principle of ci and the principle of suiting punishment to crime. thinking that they two, on the level of criminal application, condition each other to get equilibrium and serve the judicial criminal application together

    首先,作者認為不應該對罰個別化全盤否定,它的存在有理論上的合理性及實踐上的可行性;其次,作者認為罰個別化既不是法的基本,也不只是量刑原則,而是指導和行罰適用;再次,在對前兩個問題進行明確回答的基礎上,作者對罰個別化與罪相適應的關系進行了論證,認為罰個別化與罪相適應在罰適用層面上相互制約、彼此平衡,共同服務于罰公正適用。
  3. Under the 1996 amendment of the criminal procedure act, principles of presumption of innocence and in dubio pro reo have been established

    隨著1996年訴法的修改,疑罪從無已經在我國法律中確立,而與此不相協調的是大的存疑判決案件不斷沖擊著人們的對司法的信任。
  4. In this paper, the writer explores to make it clear for people to understand the criminal offence in conspiracy by untypical underworld society in four aspects including the conception and basic features of the untypical underworld society, the component elements of the criminal offence in conspiracy by untypical underworld society, the affirmation of such criminal offence and the penalty upon it, in the light of theoretical research and positive analysis. the conception of the untypical underworld society in china is summarized in comparison with the notion of " society ", " untypical underworld society " and the " features " of the untypical underworld society in china. the writer elaborates, when describing the features of the untypical underworld society, such features as " highly - organized ", that " there exists a sphere of influence in a certain district, or in a certain trade or profession, and illegal control is executed within the sphere of influence ", " with actual economic strength in pursuit of economic benefits ", " political infiltration into governmental organs with antagonism ", " decaying culture " and " the compatibility in the measures of criminal offence "

    在論述黑社會性質組織的概念時,結合「社會" 、 「黑社會」的特點和我國黑社會性質組織中「性質」的來源,最後概括出我國黑社會性質組織的概念;在論述黑社會性質組織的特徵時,本文從黑社會性質組織所具有的「比較高的組織化程度」 、 「在某一地區或某些行業具有一定的勢力范圍,並在該范圍內形成非法控制」 、 「以追求經濟利益為主要目的,具有一定的經濟實力」 、 「對政府的滲透,政治上的對抗性」 、 「文化上的腐朽性」 、 「犯罪手段上的兼并性」等方面進行闡述,特別是在「對政府的滲透,政治上的對抗性」採用大篇幅論述,並提出國家工作人員的「保護傘」既包括「包庇」又包括「縱容」 ,特別是在「縱容」方面提出了一些新的觀點;在論述黑社會性質組織犯罪構成特徵時,從犯罪的主體、侵害的客體、犯罪的客觀方面、主觀方面進行了詳細敘述;在論述黑社會性質組織犯罪的認定時,主要從黑社會性質組織與相關范疇的界限、黑社會性質組織罪的司法認定兩個方面來進行的;在論述黑社會性質組織犯罪的事處罰時,提出了對各種組織、領導、參加黑社會性質組織行為的處罰,並對提高該罪的幅度及增設財產提出了立法建議。
  5. This paper is divided into four parts to discuss the central problem except for the foreword and conclusion : the first part is devoted to solving the basic problems of aggregated consequential liability in the joint crime, prescribing and describing it from both theory and practice, and illustrates the significance of the study

    據此,文中首先對共同犯罪及結果加重犯的性質特徵進行了論述,提出了結果加重犯的危險性本質決定了共同犯罪人應共同承擔加重結果責任,而各共同犯罪人作為擬制的共同意思主體,應依從屬性定罪,依獨立性
  6. It researches on the legislation pattern and principles of amount judgment in perfecting the system

    從罰金數額立法模式的完善和罰金數額裁的完善兩方面進行研究。
  7. Take legislation pattern, it analyses the legislations of different countries, and probes the flaws of current system in our country. explore from concrete chosen pattern, singular crime and company crime amount aspects, compare with legislation models, we should decide the amount according to the criminals circumstances and economic condition. chapter five has a comprehensive discussion of fine penalty implement

    就罰金數額立法模式,首先考察了各國的立法例,分析了我國現有的罰金數額立法模式的局限,針對罰金數額立法模式的具體選擇從對自然人犯罪的罰金數額立法模式、單位犯罪罰金數額以及對罰金並罰時的數額規定三個方面進行了分析;就罰金數額裁,從罰金立法例比較,認為判處罰金,應當根據犯罪情節和犯罪人經濟狀況綜合決定罰金數額。
  8. Research on chinese ancient principle of punishment

    中國古代量刑原則
  9. The scholars from mainland china said there is no difference between the concept of basic criterion for sentencing and the principle of sentencing in terms of the harm to society and the danger to human being

    我國大陸學者也有持這種觀點的,比如陳興良、張明楷先生就認為,基準與量刑原則的含義基本相同,是指社會危害性和人身危險性。
  10. Therefore there are two points of views on the basic criterion for sentencing. one is that judges should consider the principle and element of sentencing when they pass sentences. the other is the typical state of criminals should be considered when judges pass sentencing according to or consulting the criterion and scope of penalty

    可見,關于基準的內涵學者們主要有兩種意見,一種意見是,時應當考慮的量刑原則和要素,另一種意見是,時對犯罪的典型形態應當依照或者參照的罰中國政法人學博士學位論文基準論幅度標準。
  11. With regard to the punishment of infant criminal responsibilities, we should try our best to adopt some auxiliary methods of non - penalty and abatement and exemption from penalty. during the application of punishment on juvenile, death penalty and life imprisonment should be removed, and property punishment and qualification punishment should be avoided

    在未成年人犯罪的事責任實現方式上,應當盡採用非罰方法和免除事處罰的輔助性方式;在對未成年人適用罰時,應當排除適用死和無期徒,盡不適用財產和資格;在對未成年人適用管制、拘役和有期徒時,應當始終貫徹「以教育為主、懲罰為輔」的方針和「從寬處罰」的
  12. Studing on the form of quantity of crime is to distinct types of one crime and types of plural crimes, to illustrate the constituting elements and essential nature of various forms of quantity of crime, to determine the principles to deal with different forms of quantity of quantity of crime, and to correctly decide crime and measure punishment

    結果加重犯是法罪數理論的一個重要概念,研究罪數形態的目的是為了區分一罪與數罪,闡明各種罪數形態的構成要件和本質屬性,從而確定對于不同罪數形態的處理,正確定罪
  13. To summarize all ideas, i think the basic criterion for sentencing is the principle, element and weight of punishment, for the typical state of criminals, that judges should consider over when they try cases

    筆者綜合各種意見后認為,基準是法官時應當考慮的、要素和犯罪在典型形態下應當適用的一定的罰分
  14. I choose the basic criterion for sentencing as the topic of my dissertation for the following reasons. first of all, in chinese criminal law it is considered insufficiently for the rule and elements on the discretionary action of sentencing

    本文的題目為「基準論」 ,之所以選擇這個論題,首先是因為我國法中對時應考慮的、要素規定的不全面、不詳細。
  15. But in an american book the guidance for sentencing, in which the author related the hierarchy of criminal and its corresponding penalty are similar with the concept of the basic criterion for sentencing of application related in my dissertation

    關于制定基準的理論依據,對基準而言,筆者認為應當以行為責任為主、人格責任為輔。對適用性基準而言,有罪相適應罰個別化等。
  16. This concept contains two basic criterion - the basic criterion for sentencing of the principle and the one of the application. the former is the executive condition of the later one. there are no concept of basic criterion for sentencing both in british and america criminal law

    基準之所以包括兩個部分,是因為不對性的基準即應當考慮的、要素明確規定並確定它們影響的幅度,就不可能制定正確的適用性基準,也不可能正確執行適用性的基準。
  17. For legislation, there should be a fundamental, general rule about the principle of the ci, which is abs - cent in our criminal code. but the principle has been implemented in the specific clauses ; to realize the ci in sentence, the sentence circumstances should be coped with correctly, the system of personality investigation should be applied, and the relation should be coordinated between the principle of the sentence individualization and the principle of suiting punishment to crime ; criminal execution individualization is generally realized through execution readjustment and individual treatment

    在立法上,應當對罰個別化作一性、一般性規定,而我國缺少這樣的規定,但在具體條文中卻貫徹了這一;在上要實現罰個別化,須正確處理情節,適用人格調查制度,並且要協調好個別化與罪相適應的關系;行個別化一般通過行調控和個別處遇得以實現。
  18. It states the principles, the methods of application of fine penalty and tells how to decide the amount of the fine penalty correctly so as to measure punishment accurately. at the same time, it talks about the application of fine penalty in cumulative punishment. at last, it also discusses the necessity of making a limitation of fine penalty system in criminal law in china

    主要是論述罰金適用的、適用的方式及其在司法實踐中的應用,並結合司法實踐闡述如何確定罰金的數額,做到的準確;同時,論述了數罪並罰時罰金的適用問題;最後,對我國事立法設立罰金時效制度的必要性進行論證。
  19. To operate the discretionary circumstances of sentencing precisely, we should hold the following three principles : abide by statutory buctrine, pro defendente doctrine, principle of reasonable ambiguity

    要準確運用好酌定情節,必須把握好以下三項:遵循法定、有利被告以及合理模糊
  20. The article states on the above mentioned three principles, then on this base, it brings out several suggestions on how to operate the discretionary circumstances of sentencing, in order to provide some references to the practice of our legislation and justice

    文章對上述三進行了一定程度的闡述,在上述理論的基礎上,最後對如何具體運用好酌定情節提出了幾點建議,以期對我國的立法和司法實踐提供一定的參考。
分享友人