海事求償權 的英文怎麼說

中文拼音 [hǎishìqiúchángquán]
海事求償權 英文
maritime claim
  • 事 : 名1 （事情） matter; affair thing; business 2 （事故） trouble; accident 3 （職業;工作） job; wor...
  • 求 : Ⅰ動詞1 （請求; 要求） ask; beg; request; entreat; beseech : 求人幫忙 ask sb a favour; ask a favou...
  • 償 : 動詞1. （歸還; 抵補） repay; compensate for 2. （滿足） meet; fulfil
  • 權 : Ⅰ名詞1 [書面語] （秤錘） counterpoise; weight （of a steelyard）2 （權力） power; authority 3 （...
  • 海事 : 1 （有關海上的事情） maritime affairs2 （船舶在海上發生的事故） accident on the sea海事保險 marit...
  1. Article 21 a maritime lien is the right of the claimant, subject to the provisions of article 22 of this code, to take priority in compensation against shipowners, bareboat charterers or ship operators with respect to the ship which gave rise to the said claim

    第二十一條船舶優先權，是指海事請求人依照本法第二十二條的規定，向船舶所有人、光船承租人、船舶經營人提出海事請求，對產生該海事請求的船具有優先受償的權利。
  2. The grounds based on which the insurance subrogation right is established are : torteous acts, breaches of contract, acquiring profits improperly and without legal basis and general averages

    保險代位求償權形成的事由有：侵權行為、違約行為行為、不當得利和共同海損。
  3. Starting from the regulations on marine insurance in china ' s laws and international laws, the treatise studies the legal regulations on the right of subrogation of marine insurance both domestically and abroad ; furthermore, the treatise explains the relationships between the right of subrogation and the " letter of subrogation in terms of civil laws, as well as insurable interest, litigants, objects of litigation, and extinctive prescription ; at last, the treatise discusses the application of law concerning the right of subrogation of marine insurance after china ' s entry into wto

    論文從中國法與國際法關于海上保險求償權的規定的比較入手，研討國內關于海上保險代位求償權的法律規定，進而從民法的角度說明代位求償權與「權益轉讓書」的關系，以及訴訟中的保險利益、訴訟當事人、訴訟標的、訴訟時效問題，最後淺談我國加入wto后海上保險代位求償權的法律適用。
  4. According to our country " maritime law " regulation, marine insurance contract asks to the underwriter the request of insurance compensation counterpoises, 2 years are during effectiveness for a given period of time, from insurance the sun of accident happening rises consideration

    根據我國《海商法》規定，海上保險合同向保險人要求保險賠償的請求權，時效期間為二年，自保險事故發生之日起計算。
  5. However, according to the regulations in our country ' s " special procedural law of maritime proceedings ", the insurer shall file a suit against the right of subrogation in his own name

    根據我國《海事訴訟特別程序法》第94條的規定，保險人應當以自己的名義提起代位求償權訴訟。
  6. Writer ' s view of point is that delivery of cargo without original bills of lading has the character of breaching of the contract, because releasing cargo against original bills of lading is carrier ' s legal liability in carrying out the carriage of goods by sea. also it has the character of action in tort, as if the actions violate the civil law of liability in tort, the doer shall take on the liability of compensation. however when actions are both of breach and in tort, the chinese law gives the victim the rights to choose to sue in tort or of breach, but some limitations in applying substantive law

    第二章論述無單放貨的法律性質，筆者認為，無單放貨具有違約性，因為保證憑正本提單交付貨物是承運人在履行海上貨物運輸合同中的一項法定義務；無單放貨具有侵權性，只要無單放貨行為構成承擔侵權行為民事責任的要件，無單放貨行為人就必須承擔賠償責任；同時，無單放貨的違約性和侵權性可能構成責任競合時，我國法律允許受害人可以選擇一個訴因行使其請求權，但對實體法請求權的選擇，法律作出了一定范圍的限制；最後，無單放貨在某種程度上促進了航運業的發展，我們不能一概加以否定，無單放貨在特定情況下具有一定的合理性。
  7. It compared discrepancies between relevant provisions of the roc law and international conventions, namely, the convention on liability for maritime claims 1976, the international convention relating to the limitation of the liability of owners of sea - going ships 1957 and the international convention for the unification of certain rules relating to the limitation of the liability of owners of sea - going vessels 1924

    海商法對船舶所有人責任限制規定與1976年海事索賠責任限制公約、 1957年海船所有人責任限制國際公約及1924年海船所有人責任限制統一國際公約仍有相當程度的差異，此等差異亦為此次我國對移除希臘籍阿瑪斯輪殘骸及其船上貨物之債權的求償困難原因之一。
  8. In the last part, author studies four problems in china present law, and brings forward with the probable suggestion of settlement in view of making china law perfect. first is about the anti - security provided for maybe wrongful arrest. author verifies that it is unfair to carry out most rigid request for anti - security causes esp

    第五部分從完善我國扣船制度的角度，對我國扣船制度中存在的四個問題:放寬反擔保的限制，明確錯誤扣船的法律認定和賠償范圍，建立保護船方利益的救濟程序，確定申請扣船的海事請求人與其他債權人
分享友人
分享到 Line

分享到臉書