未另列明 的英文怎麼說

中文拼音 [wèilìnglièmíng]
未另列明 英文
article not otherwise provided for
  • 未 : Ⅰ副詞1 （沒） did not; have not 2 （不） not Ⅱ名詞1 （地支的第八位） the eighth of the twelve ear...
  • 另 : Ⅰ代詞（別的） another; other Ⅱ副詞（另外） in addition; moreover; separately
  • 列 : Ⅰ動1 （排列） arrange; form a line; line up 2 （安排到某類事物之中） list; enter in a list Ⅱ名詞1...
  • 明 : Ⅰ形容詞1 （明亮） bright; brilliant; light 2 （明白;清楚） clear; distinct 3 （公開;顯露在外;不隱...
  1. But the actual procedures for co - ordination have barely been spelt out, let alone rehearsed

    但因其並未將合作細節詳細列明，另其流於形式。
  2. Payment times are also necessary in order to move forward and, should the project not work out, through no fault of either party, how to make a graceful exit from the contract

    各階段付款時程亦應列出，以利工程進行；另外，若工程未能完成，但非任一方之過失，則順利解約之法也應明載。
  3. For taught postgraduate programmes, if students have to continue studies after the normative study period will be put on continuing status and will be required to pay tuition fees, unless otherwise specified by the programme concerned. those who have completed all course requirements but cannot pass the it proficiency test within the normative study period have to pay the late examination fee for it proficiency test as well

    修讀修課式課程的學生如於常規修業期滿后繼續修課，將會成為延期生，並須繳交學費（除非個別課程另有列明） ；如學生同時未能通過資訊科技能力測試，則須繳交額外的考試費用。
  4. Thus there are two areas of concern : firstly, although criminal prosecutions or administrative means have already been carried out, the infringement has occurred and the interests of the obligee has been violated. without setting definite areas of indemnification due to the infringement, the interests of the obligee cannot be assured and on the other hand, it can not prevent further torts. secondly, in evaluating the indemnification of the torts, there is no standard or scope which can cause difficulty in judicial judgment, especially in the evaluation of the intangible injury or the injury which cannot be enumerated, and in the evaluation of the evidence that causes injury

    在過去多年的司法實踐表明，單憑刑事和行政手段，未必能完全保護知識產權權利人之利益，這里有兩個方面思考：第一，即使作出了刑事和行政手段，有關的侵害行為可能已經作出，並導致權利人利益受損，在沒有規范侵權人需要為侵權行為所承擔的賠償范圍，一方面未能保障權利人之利益，另一方面也未能產生阻嚇作用，提升預防功能；第二，對侵權行為進行損害賠償計算時，並沒有統一標準和范圍，對于司法審判造成一定難度，尤其是對于非財產損害之計算、造成損失之舉證和無法列明之損失各個方面，也使法官在確定損害賠償金額時，需要考慮和注意的問題。
分享友人
分享到 Line

分享到臉書