訴訟辯護制度 的英文怎麼說
中文拼音 [sùsòngbànhùzhìdù]
訴訟辯護制度
英文
adversarial system- 訴 : 動詞1. (說給人) tell; relate; inform 2. (傾吐) complain; accuse 3. (控告) appeal to; resort to
- 訟 : 動詞1. (打官司) bring a case to court 2. (爭辯是非) dispute; argue
- 辯 : 動詞(辯解; 辯論) argue; debate; dispute
- 護 : 動詞1. (保護; 保衛) protect; guard; shield 2. (袒護;包庇) be partial to; shield from censure
- 制 : Ⅰ動詞1 (製造) make; manufacture 2 (擬訂; 規定) draw up; establish 3 (用強力約束; 限定; 管束...
- 度 : 度動詞[書面語] (推測; 估計) surmise; estimate
- 訴訟 : [法律] lawsuit; litigation; legal action; judicial action; action
- 辯護 : 1 (說明意見或行為正確) speak [come out] in defense of; argue in favour of; defend 2 [法律] (對...
-
Class action, orgnization action, relator action and mass action are concrete patterns of public interest action. public interest action ' s effective motion depends on some factors, such as the ideological trend of wellfare county, lawey ' s pleading for public interest, the private ' s active participation and relevant system " s coordination
集團訴訟、團體訴訟、民眾訴訟、檢舉人訴訟等都是公益訴訟的具體形態。公益訴訟的良好運行需要有福利國家的社會思想基礎、律師的公益辯護、私人的積極參與和相關制度的配臺等多種因素的共同作用。To balance the right to prosecute of the state to realize the procedural justice, c. to make the action more effective to guarantee the highly skillful and specialized criminal proceedings be smoothly carried out, e. to expressly and legislatively regulate the concrete system for lawyers to protect the legal interests of the suspects and accused and to highlight the concept on the protection of their legal interests
賦予並確保律師調查權具有以下幾個方面的價值:有助於查清案情,實現實體公正;平衡國家追訴權,實現程序公正;提高訴訟效率,保障高度技術化、專門化的刑事訴訟程序的順利進行;從立法上明文規定辯護律師維護犯罪嫌疑人、被告人合法權益的具體制度,可以從觀念上強化保護犯罪嫌疑人、被告人合法權益的思想意識。With the improvement of reform of criminal court trial system, the current criminal procedure law bestows equal rights on the accused and the defended to provide evidence and to question the witness in the procedure of trial
摘要隨著刑事庭審制度改革的不斷完善,我國現行《刑事訴訟法》賦予了控訴方和辯護方在刑事庭審過程中雙方權利對等的提出證據權和質證權。At the same time, as the legislation on this procedural system is too simple, and without any contents, ways and time limit of judicial review, especially without any right of defense of the accused during the proceedings for revision, which leads to the procedure similar to the administrative examination and approval system and without any lawsuit color, so as to interfere with the pursuit of the procedure to the value of justice during the
同時,由於立法在該程序制度規定上過于簡單,對復核內容、方法、期限均未做出規定,尤其是未規定被告人在復核程序中的辯護權,從而使這一程序近似行政審批制度而鮮有訴訟色彩,更加影響了該程序在死刑案件裁判中對公正價值的追求。當前,死刑復核程序中許多制度性變革被提上議事日程,人們開始重新思考這一程序的性質和存在價值等問題。Though we have not constituted the procedural defense system, the criminal procedure law and the related judicial interpretations do not ostracize it
我國目前尚未建立起程序性辯護制度,但我國刑事訴訟法以及相關司法解釋並不排斥程序性辯護。Therefore, how to set up the scientific system advocate by designation of our country, which is the system of criminal procedure modernization we must answer
因此,如何科學地構建我國的指定辯護制度,是我國刑事訴訟制度現代化過程中必須回答的問題。The mechanism comprises the interior structural factor and the exterior supporting system. the impartial judges, the due process and the fair distribution of the burden of proof are the main interior factors. as for the exterior system, since procedural defense exists in all the procedural stages and involves all the special organs and all the parties, almost every specific criminal procedure system has an impact on procedural defense
這一套運行機制包括程序性辯護制度的內部構造因素和外部配套制度,其內部構造因素主要包括符合司法公正基本要求的裁決者、符合程序正當性要求的訴訟程序以及合理的舉證責任分配製度等;就外部配套制度而言,因為程序性辯護在縱向上分佈於刑事訴訟各個階段、在橫向上牽涉到刑事訴訟各個機關和參與人,所以幾乎所有的刑事訴訟具體制度都可能對程序性辯護產生較大的影響。However, with the perfection of criminal law system and the revision of criminal procedure law by the standing committee of the tenth national people ' s congress, it is essential to improve and perfect the appointed defense system
但是,隨著我國刑事法制建設的不斷發展,以及《刑事訴訟法》的再修改納入第十屆全國人大常委會立法規劃,改革和完善指定辯護制度已經勢在必行。So this paper proposes that inversed burden of proof in civil litigation of domestic violence shall be adopted, and the expert testimony rule on “ battered woman syndrome ” used in common law countries be introduced into the legal practice of china in order to provide justifiable defense for domestic violence victims in the particular circumstance of “ resisting violence through violence ”
因此,本文認為應在家庭暴力民事訴訟中適用舉證責任倒置制度。並且主張應將英美法系一些國家實行的「受虐婦女綜合癥」專家證詞制度引入我國司法實踐,為那些在特殊情況下「以暴抗暴」的家庭暴力受害者做正當防衛辯護。The aim of this article is to develop some effective studying on this point through the analysis of internal value of the displaying system of criminal evidence, and describes the active functions of it both on justice and efficiency as well as protection of the defence right of accused party. furthermore, the article compared different displaying systems of criminal evidence of the usa, great britain, japan, and italy to discuss the development rules of this system combing with the chinese present mixing litigation mode of original authority lawsuit method and the oppositional court inquiring method by both parties, which comparing and analyzing the rules of evidence - displaying both of original and present modes to list the problems existed in the present criminal evidence - displaying system. finally, the article brings forward some conceives of configuration and perfecting of chinese criminal evidence - displaying system from the selection of mode, scope, and judge function of criminal evidence - displaying and penalty measures to the deregulation of displaying of evidence etc
首先從分析刑事證據展示制度的內在價值入手,充分闡述其在實現公正與效率兼顧和保護被告人辯護權方面的積極作用;其次通過對美國、英國、日本和義大利的刑事證據展示制度的比較,來探析該制度的發展規律;再次結合我國的刑事訴訟從原來的職權主義訴訟模式轉變為現在兼有當事人主義有關規定的混合式訴訟模式,對前後兩種模式中具有證據展示性質的規定進行比較分析,說明現在刑事證據展示方面存在的諸多問題;最後從刑事證據展示的模式選擇、刑事證據展示的范圍、法官在證據展示中的作用、以及違反證據展示規則的制裁措施等幾個主要方面,對構建和完善我國的刑事證據展示制度提出了設想。Second, discusses the imputation of the liability of trademark right, and points out : it is practicable to establish the system of " right of the real claim " or " right of intellectual property claim ", with succeeding and perfecting the system of liability for tort at the same time ; the compensation for damage of infringement of trademark right should take the principle liability for fault as the main liability principle and the principle liability for fault inferred as a complement. third, discusses the excuses which may be as a plea in the action of the infringement of trademark right, such as fair use, prior right, forfeiter of trademark right. at last, approach the subject that how to apply and perfect legal proceedings and alter ways to the remedies of trademark right
接著,探討了侵犯商標權責任的認定,指出:可在繼承與完善我國侵權民事責任制度的同時設立物上請求權或知識產權上請求權制度來保護商標權;侵犯商標權的損害賠償宜採用過錯責任為主、過錯推定責任為輔的歸責原則;隨后,探討了侵犯商標權訴訟中可以作為抗辯的事由,如合理使用、在先權、商標權無效等;最後,探討了運用和完善訴訟和訴訟外兩種方式救濟商標權的問題。In such a social structure, the right departmentalism should be established in the legal system and the constitutionalism should be practised so that the state power is restricted for safeguarding the citizen right, and at the same time, the relationship of the binary society structure should be maintained so as to keep the action bounds between civil society and political state, which is realized through the restriction that the lawyer ' s right is exercised to create to penal power
由於是市民社會決定和制約政治國家,這就決定了法律制度應確立權利本位,實行憲政來制約國家權力,以保障公民的權利。同時,為了使市民社會與政治國家各自在自己的利益界線內活動,還要求保持二元並立關系。在刑事訴訟領域,這些要求主要是通過辯護律師訴訟權利的行使所形成的對權力制約、抗衡來實現的。It mainly includes : consultations and negotiations that have been done for defendants in the problems of declaring guilty and reducing penalty between accusing party ( public procurator ) and defensive party. ( defendant, defense counsel ) before the court opens. when the defendant gives a certain satisfactory answers to the questions which the public procurators ask, according to the concrete conditions of the case. the public procurator will decide to reduce the quantity of charging, lower the quality of accusing guilty or put forward some suggestions for the court to reduce penalty
辯訴交易(或譯答辯交易)制度,是源自美國刑事訴訟審前程序中一項獨特的公訴制度,其主要內容為:控方(檢察官)同辯方(被告人或辯護律師)在法院開庭前對被告人的定罪和量刑問題進行協商、談判,被告人在滿足檢察官提出的一定條件(主要是認罪)后,檢察官根據案件具體情況作出減少指控數量,降低控罪性質,或者向法院提出減刑建議。This reform has significance of preventing the judge from preconceptions. but, because of the defects in the design of the systems, the system of discovery of evidence which is necessary to the new model of prosecution has n ' t been established at the same time. it led to the arising of new problems in practice, the most prominent one among them is the obstacle which obstructs the defense attorney to review files, and as a result, the reform in trial system has n ' t worked as expected
我國修改後的刑事訴訟法採用了部分案件材料移送式起訴方式,這一改革對于避免法官先入為主,產生預斷具有積極意義,但由於制度設計上的缺陷,與新起訴方式相配套的證據開示制度未能與之同步建立,導致在實踐中出現了新的問題,其中最為突出的就是辯護律師閱卷權的行使受到阻礙,使得與之相關的庭審程序改革難以取得人們所期望的效果。The main points and legal theory of evidence discovery procedure internationally 2. 1 the obligation of evidence discovery of mutual parties in a litigation the us emphasizes the principle of mutually equal treatment, in other words, the evidence discovery regime is mutual
二、國外證據展示程序的要點和法理(一)關于訴訟雙方證據展示的責任美國要求實行對等原則,即實行相互展示制度。英國基本趨向是強化辯護方的證據展示責任。分享友人