辯護方的權利 的英文怎麼說

中文拼音 [bànhùfāngdequánlì]
辯護方的權利 英文
rights of the defence
  • 辯 : 動詞（辯解; 辯論） argue; debate; dispute
  • 護 : 動詞1. （保護; 保衛） protect; guard; shield 2. （袒護;包庇） be partial to; shield from censure
  • 方 : Ⅰ名詞1 （方形; 方體） square 2 [數學] （乘方） involution; power 3 （方向） direction 4 （方面） ...
  • 的 : 4次方是 The fourth power of 2 is direction
  • 權 : Ⅰ名詞1 [書面語] （秤錘） counterpoise; weight （of a steelyard）2 （權力） power; authority 3 （...
  • 辯護 : 1 （說明意見或行為正確） speak [come out] in defense of; argue in favour of; defend 2 [法律] （對...
  • 方的 : austral
  • 權利 : rightinterest
  1. The third part gives relevant legislation suggestions and strategies in three aspects in the light of the shortages of demurring patent tort. these suggestions and strategies are : 1 ) constitute law of anti - monopolization imitating countries that have advanced legislation of intellectual property rights to prevent patentee from abusing his rights ; 2 ) smooth the way of administrative law execution of patent and delimit properly the bounds between administrative law execution and judicial review ; 3 ) strengthen imitational communication and academic discussion in demurring patent tort and increase the strength of being in line with the world

    第三大部分是針對目前我國在專利侵權抗辯問題上存在的不足之處提出了三個方面的立法建議及對策，一是效仿知識產權立法先進國家制定一部反壟斷法，防止專利權人對其權利濫用；二是理順專利行政執法途徑，正確界定專利行政執法與司法審查之間的界限；三是加強專利侵權抗辯方面的國際交流與理論探討，加大與國際接軌的力度，充分利用國際條約，最大限度地保護我國的國家利益。
  2. Lastly, we should revise and improve current legal provisions, make the criminal suspect enjoy silence right, knowing rights and right of complaint, etc. from entity and procedure, make the lawyer enjoy right to meet, right to present, investigating and collecting evidence rights, etc. only so, the criminal suspect s right of denfense can be realized

    最後，要修改與完善現行的法律規定，從實體和程序方面使犯罪嫌疑人享有沉默權、知悉權、控告權等權利，使律師享有會見權、在場權、調查取證權等權利。唯如此，犯罪嫌疑人的辯護權才能夠實現。
  3. To balance the right to prosecute of the state to realize the procedural justice, c. to make the action more effective to guarantee the highly skillful and specialized criminal proceedings be smoothly carried out, e. to expressly and legislatively regulate the concrete system for lawyers to protect the legal interests of the suspects and accused and to highlight the concept on the protection of their legal interests

    賦予並確保律師調查權具有以下幾個方面的價值：有助於查清案情，實現實體公正；平衡國家追訴權，實現程序公正；提高訴訟效率，保障高度技術化、專門化的刑事訴訟程序的順利進行；從立法上明文規定辯護律師維護犯罪嫌疑人、被告人合法權益的具體制度，可以從觀念上強化保護犯罪嫌疑人、被告人合法權益的思想意識。
  4. With the improvement of reform of criminal court trial system, the current criminal procedure law bestows equal rights on the accused and the defended to provide evidence and to question the witness in the procedure of trial

    摘要隨著刑事庭審制度改革的不斷完善，我國現行《刑事訴訟法》賦予了控訴方和辯護方在刑事庭審過程中雙方權利對等的提出證據權和質證權。
  5. Suppose someone wrongs us, accuses us of something that we have not done, or deprives us of something that we rightfully deserve, then we need a lawyer to defend for us because we do not know much about the law. he is an expert and can argue for us, then we need an attorney. they should be the ones who defend the weak and help ignorant or oppressed people

    比方說，有人誤會我們，或控告我們莫須有的罪名，或剝奪我們應有的權利，正因為我們對法律所知有限，所以才聘請律師為我們辯護，由於法律是律師的專長，他們可以幫我們辯護，所以才需要律師，而律師也應該替弱勢無知，或被壓迫的人打抱不平才是。
  6. The adversarial nature of the trial process is the immediate determinant of its structural elements : the different stages which structure the proceedings. these ensure that for each witness / defendant there will be an examination - in - chief, by his own supportive counsel and a cross - examination, by the adversarial counsel / prosecutor. as well, each counsel / prosecutor typically will open his case by an opening address, and will close the case by a closing address

    它的抗辯性質貫穿于構成庭審的各個階段：出庭的證人既享有被己方律師提問的權利，又承擔接受對方律師質證的義務；任何類型的庭審，律師公訴人都有權在庭審前申明代理、辯護意見，並在庭審結束時進行總結陳詞；陪審團出庭的案件中，法官還要向陪審團做出關於法律適用的指令。
  7. Take a broad view of the legislation and practices with the administration of justice in some western main countries governed by law for the guarantee measures of ciminal suspect s right of defense from the procedure of investigation, there are some differences in excluding rule of evidence, the lawyer ’ s right and the criminal suspect law aid, etc. however, the main countries governed by law above generally approve the criminal suspect enjoys the right of denfense during the course of investigation and has all stipulated the comparatively detailed guarantee measures to this kind of right

    綜觀一些西方主要法治國家的立法規定與司法實踐，英美法系國家和大陸法系國家對于偵查程序中犯罪嫌疑人辯護權的保障措施，分別在證據排除規則，辯護律師的權利以及犯罪嫌疑人的法律援助等方面呈現出一些區別。但是兩大法系主要法治國家普遍地認可犯罪嫌疑人在偵查階段享有辯護權，而且對這種權利都規定了較為詳細的保障措施。
  8. 10. you agree not to sue hksarg and agree to indemnify, defend and hold harmless hksarg, its officers and employees from any and all third party claims, liability, damages and or costs including, but not limited to, legal fees arising from your use of the software and document, your violation of the terms of use or infringement of any intellectual property or other right of any person or entity

    10 .你同意不會因你使用有關軟體及文件你違反本使用條款或對任何人或實體的知識產權或其他權利的侵犯所引致的任何第三方索償法律責任損害賠償及或費用包括但不限於法律費用，而就此起訴特區政府：你又同意在上述情況下為特區政府及其人員和雇員作出彌償辯護，和使其免受損害。
  9. The aim of this article is to develop some effective studying on this point through the analysis of internal value of the displaying system of criminal evidence, and describes the active functions of it both on justice and efficiency as well as protection of the defence right of accused party. furthermore, the article compared different displaying systems of criminal evidence of the usa, great britain, japan, and italy to discuss the development rules of this system combing with the chinese present mixing litigation mode of original authority lawsuit method and the oppositional court inquiring method by both parties, which comparing and analyzing the rules of evidence - displaying both of original and present modes to list the problems existed in the present criminal evidence - displaying system. finally, the article brings forward some conceives of configuration and perfecting of chinese criminal evidence - displaying system from the selection of mode, scope, and judge function of criminal evidence - displaying and penalty measures to the deregulation of displaying of evidence etc

    首先從分析刑事證據展示制度的內在價值入手，充分闡述其在實現公正與效率兼顧和保護被告人辯護權方面的積極作用；其次通過對美國、英國、日本和義大利的刑事證據展示制度的比較，來探析該制度的發展規律；再次結合我國的刑事訴訟從原來的職權主義訴訟模式轉變為現在兼有當事人主義有關規定的混合式訴訟模式，對前後兩種模式中具有證據展示性質的規定進行比較分析，說明現在刑事證據展示方面存在的諸多問題；最後從刑事證據展示的模式選擇、刑事證據展示的范圍、法官在證據展示中的作用、以及違反證據展示規則的制裁措施等幾個主要方面，對構建和完善我國的刑事證據展示制度提出了設想。
  10. Because our legal system belong to the common law, but anticipatory breach is the characteristic of english - american law, can anticipatory breach solve the problems in common law ? when the anticipatory breach is introduced, are there conflicts in the institution ? how to improve the anticipatory breach with these projblems with some faults and shortcomings ? this paper inquires these things in three parts. starting bread with the two outside forms of the auticipatory and the two outside forms of the auticipatory non - permermance, the first part of the passage inquires the value and the orcial base of the anticipatory breach by surveyingjit ' s origination and changing process under the origination and changing process under the special historical background. by comparing the anticipatory breach with counterargument right for security, the second part states a viewpoint that the former is superior is superior to the latter in protection parties " lawful rights though there are many similarities and differences between them. from this, we can come to a comclusion that the counterargument right for security is no substition for conticipetory breach and that the former should be part of the latter. the third party gives a detailed explanation of anticipatory breach in english ? american law systems in chinese system of anticipatory breach. finally, the anther makes some important suggestion : first, the subject of counterargument right for security should be attend to either party of the contract

    其價值在於使受害方能提前獲得法律上的救濟，防止其蒙受本來可以避免的損失。第二部分筆者通過對預期違約與不安抗辯權的比較研究，對我國《合同法》應如何處理、協調來自不同法系的這兩項並不完全相同的法律制度的關系提出了自己的觀點。筆者認為不安抗辯權是通過對合同利益期待權的保護，實現法律「公平」和「安全」的價值，而預期違約除標示上述價值目標外，更是法律對「效率違約」這一經濟理論的認可，顯示了法律對「效益」這一價值目標的追求，從而提出預期違約與不安杭辮權二者制度功能相似而制度構造不同，預期違約制度較之不安杭辮權更有利於保護當事人的合法權益，由此得出我國《合同法》中不安抗辮權不僅不能替代預期違約，而是預期違約應該吸納不安抗辮權的結論
  11. The shipyard shall indemnify the buyer from and against any patent liability or claim for infringement of any patent or commercial or intellectual property right of any kind or nature ( including costs and expenses ) made or used in the performance of this contract and also including costs and expenses of litigation if any, including all claims of third parties arising by reason of the production of, circulation or use of plans and of any document or information supplied to the shipyard or its subcontractors, in connection with the construction and the building of the vessel or the construction or installation of its machinery or equipment, provided that the buyer shall first have given the shipyard immediate notice of any claims for infringement and also have given the shipyard the opportunity to defend and take over the conduct of any claim subject to the shipyard providing an indemnity to the buyer for the costs of defending such a claim

    在執行本合約時，所用的任何專利、商業財產權、智慧財產權，若因此衍生任何專利責任或侵權索賠，賣方（造船廠）須使買方無事，並賠償買方一切相關費用，以及任何訴訟費用（若有支付） ；而且，興建本船舶或製造、安裝本船的機器或設備時，因製作、流通、及使用藍圖、文件、或數據，供賣方或承包商利用，因而造成第三方的索賠行為，賣方仍須如上述負起全責；唯一旦遇到任何侵權索賠情況，買方須立即告知賣方，並給予賣方餘裕接手辯護該案，同時依約賠償買方處理此案之費用。
  12. In the legislation, the law, on one hand, requires criminal suspects to state accurately and the criminal suspects does not enjoy silence right ; on the other hand, lawyer ’ s status is flur in the proceduce of investigation and the lawyer doesn ’ t have right to get involved in the procedure of investigation

    相比之下，我國偵查程序中犯罪嫌疑人的辯護權狀況是不令人滿意的。立法上，一方面法律要求犯罪嫌疑人應當如實供述，犯罪嫌疑人不享有沉默權;另一方面，律師在偵查程序中的地位模糊不清，沒有充分介入偵查程序的權利。
分享友人
分享到 Line

分享到臉書