違反誠信原則 的英文怎麼說

中文拼音 [wéifǎnchéngxìnyuán]
違反誠信原則 英文
breach of good faith
  • : 動詞1. (不遵照; 不依從) disobey; defy; violate 2. (離別) part; leave; be separated
  • : Ⅰ名詞1 (方向相背) reverse side 2 (造反) rebellion 3 (指反革命、反動派) counterrevolutionari...
  • : Ⅰ形容詞(真心實意) sincere; honest Ⅱ名詞(誠意) sincerity; earnestness Ⅲ副詞[書面語] (實在; 的...
  • : Ⅰ形容詞1 (最初的; 原來的) primary; original; former 2 (沒有加工的) unprocessed; raw Ⅱ動詞(原...
  • : Ⅰ名詞1 (規范) standard; norm; criterion 2 (規則) regulation; rule; law 3 (姓氏) a surname Ⅱ...
  • 違反 : violate; run counter to; transgress; infringe
  • 誠信 : good faith
  1. At last, the thesis introduces the remedies to each party when the other party has breached the principle of utmost good faith

    文章第三部分著重論述的是最大的救濟方法,其中包括撤銷合同、損害賠償等。
  2. Legal purposes : we will not disclose any of your personal information unless we have your permission or in special cases where we fully believe in good faith that the disclosure of your information is necessary to identify, contact or bring legal action against those who may be violating the terms of service of the website or may be causing interference with the rights or property of the website

    合法目的:我們將不泄露您的個人資訊,除非我們有您的同意,或在特殊案件下,我們依,資訊的公開對于指認聯絡或控訴那些本網站服務條款或可能造成侵犯本網站權利或財產權的人士,是必要的。
  3. Article 12 terms and conditions set in a standard contract, which violate the principle of good faith and are conspicuously unfair to consumers, shall be null and void

    第12條(定型化契約無效之情形)定型化契約中之條款違反誠信原則,對消費者顯失公平者,無效。
  4. The trend of the legislation in many countries, the parties prosecute civil action must follow the principle of good faith and bear the obligation to find true fact

    而當事人實施訴訟行為應遵守及負有真實義務,者應承擔一定法律效果,已為近年來各國立法之所趨。
  5. Breach of good faith

    違反誠信原則
  6. Conclude a treaty error is to point to in conclude a treaty level, one party or bilateral existence violate sincere letter principle intended or error behavior, bring about a contract to cannot conclude, or concluded contract disables or by cancel, cause to the other side thereby damage

    締約過失是指在締約階段,一方或雙方存在違反誠信原則的故意或過失行為,並導致合同無法訂立,或訂立的合同無效或被撤銷,從而給對方造成損害。
  7. For a long time, the action mode of authority creed has been adopted in civil procedure, while the legislation and the theoretical circles do n ' t pay enough attention to the principle of good faith. compared to western countries, the existing system of civil procedure cannot effectively protect the right of action of the parties. although we do not have the tradition of the rule of law, our culture of

    訴訟法既保障當事人實質意義上的公正,也強調當事人人格尊嚴不受侵犯,實質公正和程序公正並重,因此,訴訟法上的歸責不以行為人給他人造成實際損害為要件,只要行為人實施了義務的行為,且主觀上存在過錯,即應承擔違反誠信原則的法律後果。
  8. But securities fraud in this thesis is limited in civil fraud, it means any misconducts in breach of the principle of fairness and good faith existing in the issuing, trading and other related activities of securities

    並對三者作了區分。而本文所指的證券欺詐僅限民事欺詐,指的是在證券發行、交易及相關活動中任何公平合理和的行為。
  9. In view of this, one party of the contract should undertake the anticipatory contract obligations by abiding by the principle of honest and credibi 1 i ty

    鑒於此,才使締約的當事人負有基於而產生的先契約義務,而這一義務並使相對方賴利益受損時,即應承擔締約過失責任。
  10. First, the author will introduce the well - known trademark rights infringement dispute in which “ the maple leaf sued the crocodile ”. it caused the legal scientific and practical fields ’ attention to the emergence of trademark reverse passing off in china. second, the author will define the profound term of trademark reverse passing off in simple language, namely : “ trademark reverse passing off ” refers to the illegal act of changing or removing others ’ registered trademarks without permission and putting in others ’ commodities to the market

    這種行為不僅影響了商標的本質功能,引起商品流通秩序的混亂,了對注冊商標專用權保護的法律艦定,侵犯了商標權人的合法權益,而且妨礙了商品生產者擴大其商標知名度和提高產品市場份額,背公平競爭、用的商業道德和法律
  11. The author, basing on the basic theories of principle of utmost good faith, researches some important theoretic questions of constructions, application and legal consequences in breach of the insurer " s duty of utmost good faith ; inquires into several representative types of the insurer " s duty of utmost good faith, including duty of the insurer " s disclose, duty of the insurer " s explanation, especially exclusive clause, duty of information, the insurer " s duty when the assured delays to pay premium and the insurer " s duty in compensation ; oppugns the relative provisions in insurance legislation

    為此,作者以最大基本理論為基礎,對保險人的最大義務內容、適用、的法律後果等一系列重要理論問題進行了研究;對幾種典型的保險人最大義務,包括保險人告知義務、保險人對格式合同尤其免責條款的說明義務、通知義務、投保人遲延繳納保險費時保險人的最大義務及保險人在理賠過程中的最大義務進行了探討;並對我國保險立法中上述相關規定提出了質疑。
  12. And this type of liability should character in the course of entering a contract, one party breaching the obligation with subjective fault, making the other party losses and the function of compensation. on the issues of liability basis, by criticizing tort doctrine, legal behavior doctrine, and regulatory doctrine, points out that the theoretical basis of the liability id good faith. the material foundation is subject to the liability basis, and the liability not only in the circumstances of contract coming into existence, be announced invalid and be cancelled, but possibly exists on occasion that contract is valid

    首先,文章指出締約過失責任的概念應包涵產生時間、主觀狀態、先合同義務的及損害的產生四個關鍵因素,具有產生於締約過程中、一方因主觀過錯先合同義務、給對方造成損害以及彌補功能等特徵;在責任基礎的問題上,通過對侵權行為說、法律行為說、法律規定說等對觀點的批駁,指出締約過失責任的理論基礎是,其賴以產生的事實基礎除了致合同不成立之締約過失、合同被確認無效或被撤銷之締約過失外,提出了合同有效情況下締約過失存在的可能性。
  13. The author points out that its constitutive requirements include the act of one party who breaches the pre - contract obligations, subjective fault of the party who breaches the pre - contract obligations, damages suffered by the aggrieved party, and the causation relation between the act in violation of the pre - contract obligations and the harmful consequence. the article further expounds the scope of application of the contracting fault liability, which includes the non - formation of the contract, invalidity of the contract, cancellation of the contract, the contract being formed but not coming into effect, the scope of compensation for the contracting fault liability should be confined to trust interest losses

    同時分析了締約過失責任的法理基礎? ?,並指出其構成要件應為:締約一方有先合同義務的行為,先合同義務方主觀上有過錯,對方受到損害,先合同義務行為與損害結果有因果關系;接著進一步詳細論述了締約過失責任適用的范圍:合同不成立、合同無效、合同被撤銷、合同已成立但未生效;然後明確了締約過失賠償范圍是賴利益損失。
分享友人